Cargando…

Is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain?

RATIONALE: Implicit racial bias affects many human interactions including patient-physician encounters. Its impact, however, varies between studies. We assessed the effects of physician implicit, racial bias on their management of cancer-related pain using a randomized field experiment. METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiscella, Kevin, Epstein, Ronald M., Griggs, Jennifer J., Marshall, Mary M., Shields, Cleveland G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257794
_version_ 1784590942448123904
author Fiscella, Kevin
Epstein, Ronald M.
Griggs, Jennifer J.
Marshall, Mary M.
Shields, Cleveland G.
author_facet Fiscella, Kevin
Epstein, Ronald M.
Griggs, Jennifer J.
Marshall, Mary M.
Shields, Cleveland G.
author_sort Fiscella, Kevin
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Implicit racial bias affects many human interactions including patient-physician encounters. Its impact, however, varies between studies. We assessed the effects of physician implicit, racial bias on their management of cancer-related pain using a randomized field experiment. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of a randomized field experiment between 2012 and 2016 with 96 primary care physicians and oncologists using unannounced, Black and White standardized patients (SPs)who reported uncontrolled bone pain from metastatic lung cancer. We assessed implicit bias using a pain-adaptation of the race Implicit Association Test. We assessed clinical care by reviewing medical records and prescriptions, and we assessed communication from coded transcripts and covert audiotapes of the unannounced standardized patient office visits. We assessed effects of interactions of physicians’ implicit bias and SP race with clinical care and communication outcomes. We conducted a slopes analysis to examine the nature of significant interactions. RESULTS: As hypothesized, physicians with greater implicit bias provided lower quality care to Black SPs, including fewer renewals for an indicated opioid prescription and less patient-centered pain communication, but similar routine pain assessment. In contrast to our other hypotheses, physician implicit bias did not interact with SP race for prognostic communication or verbal dominance. Analysis of the slopes for the cross-over interactions showed that greater physician bias was manifested by more frequent opioid prescribing and greater discussion of pain for White SPs and slightly less frequent prescribing and pain talk for Black SPs with the opposite effect among physicians with lower implicit bias. Findings are limited by use of an unvalidated, pain-adapted IAT. CONCLUSION: Using SP methodology, physicians’ implicit bias was associated with clinically meaningful, racial differences in management of uncontrolled pain related to metastatic lung cancer. There is favorable treatment of White or Black SPs, depending on the level of implicit bias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8550362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85503622021-10-28 Is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain? Fiscella, Kevin Epstein, Ronald M. Griggs, Jennifer J. Marshall, Mary M. Shields, Cleveland G. PLoS One Research Article RATIONALE: Implicit racial bias affects many human interactions including patient-physician encounters. Its impact, however, varies between studies. We assessed the effects of physician implicit, racial bias on their management of cancer-related pain using a randomized field experiment. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of a randomized field experiment between 2012 and 2016 with 96 primary care physicians and oncologists using unannounced, Black and White standardized patients (SPs)who reported uncontrolled bone pain from metastatic lung cancer. We assessed implicit bias using a pain-adaptation of the race Implicit Association Test. We assessed clinical care by reviewing medical records and prescriptions, and we assessed communication from coded transcripts and covert audiotapes of the unannounced standardized patient office visits. We assessed effects of interactions of physicians’ implicit bias and SP race with clinical care and communication outcomes. We conducted a slopes analysis to examine the nature of significant interactions. RESULTS: As hypothesized, physicians with greater implicit bias provided lower quality care to Black SPs, including fewer renewals for an indicated opioid prescription and less patient-centered pain communication, but similar routine pain assessment. In contrast to our other hypotheses, physician implicit bias did not interact with SP race for prognostic communication or verbal dominance. Analysis of the slopes for the cross-over interactions showed that greater physician bias was manifested by more frequent opioid prescribing and greater discussion of pain for White SPs and slightly less frequent prescribing and pain talk for Black SPs with the opposite effect among physicians with lower implicit bias. Findings are limited by use of an unvalidated, pain-adapted IAT. CONCLUSION: Using SP methodology, physicians’ implicit bias was associated with clinically meaningful, racial differences in management of uncontrolled pain related to metastatic lung cancer. There is favorable treatment of White or Black SPs, depending on the level of implicit bias. Public Library of Science 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8550362/ /pubmed/34705826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257794 Text en © 2021 Fiscella et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fiscella, Kevin
Epstein, Ronald M.
Griggs, Jennifer J.
Marshall, Mary M.
Shields, Cleveland G.
Is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain?
title Is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain?
title_full Is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain?
title_fullStr Is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain?
title_full_unstemmed Is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain?
title_short Is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain?
title_sort is physician implicit bias associated with differences in care by patient race for metastatic cancer-related pain?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257794
work_keys_str_mv AT fiscellakevin isphysicianimplicitbiasassociatedwithdifferencesincarebypatientraceformetastaticcancerrelatedpain
AT epsteinronaldm isphysicianimplicitbiasassociatedwithdifferencesincarebypatientraceformetastaticcancerrelatedpain
AT griggsjenniferj isphysicianimplicitbiasassociatedwithdifferencesincarebypatientraceformetastaticcancerrelatedpain
AT marshallmarym isphysicianimplicitbiasassociatedwithdifferencesincarebypatientraceformetastaticcancerrelatedpain
AT shieldsclevelandg isphysicianimplicitbiasassociatedwithdifferencesincarebypatientraceformetastaticcancerrelatedpain