Graded epistemic justification

The adjective ‘is justified’ has all the hallmarks of a gradable adjective. But the relationship between gradable uses and straightforward predications of the form ‘x is justified’ has been underexplored by epistemologists. In this paper we undertake to do some ground clearing as a prelude to better...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawthorne, John, Logins, Artūrs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01512-0
_version_ 1784590979437690880
author Hawthorne, John
Logins, Artūrs
author_facet Hawthorne, John
Logins, Artūrs
author_sort Hawthorne, John
collection PubMed
description The adjective ‘is justified’ has all the hallmarks of a gradable adjective. But the relationship between gradable uses and straightforward predications of the form ‘x is justified’ has been underexplored by epistemologists. In this paper we undertake to do some ground clearing as a prelude to better understanding this relationship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8550551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85505512021-11-10 Graded epistemic justification Hawthorne, John Logins, Artūrs Philos Stud Article The adjective ‘is justified’ has all the hallmarks of a gradable adjective. But the relationship between gradable uses and straightforward predications of the form ‘x is justified’ has been underexplored by epistemologists. In this paper we undertake to do some ground clearing as a prelude to better understanding this relationship. Springer Netherlands 2020-08-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550551/ /pubmed/34776540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01512-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hawthorne, John
Logins, Artūrs
Graded epistemic justification
title Graded epistemic justification
title_full Graded epistemic justification
title_fullStr Graded epistemic justification
title_full_unstemmed Graded epistemic justification
title_short Graded epistemic justification
title_sort graded epistemic justification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01512-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hawthornejohn gradedepistemicjustification
AT loginsarturs gradedepistemicjustification

Ejemplares similares