Cargando…

Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia)

The emergence of pottery in Europe is associated with two distinct traditions: hunter-gatherers in the east of the continent during the early 6th millennium BC and early agricultural communities in the south-west in the late 7th millennium BC. Here we investigate the function of pottery from the sit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bondetti, Manon, González Carretero, Lara, Dolbunova, Ekaterina, McGrath, Krista, Presslee, Sam, Lucquin, Alexandre, Tsybriy, Viktor, Mazurkevich, Andrey, Tsybriy, Andrey, Jordan, Peter, Heron, Carl, Meadows, John, Craig, Oliver E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2
_version_ 1784590992478830592
author Bondetti, Manon
González Carretero, Lara
Dolbunova, Ekaterina
McGrath, Krista
Presslee, Sam
Lucquin, Alexandre
Tsybriy, Viktor
Mazurkevich, Andrey
Tsybriy, Andrey
Jordan, Peter
Heron, Carl
Meadows, John
Craig, Oliver E.
author_facet Bondetti, Manon
González Carretero, Lara
Dolbunova, Ekaterina
McGrath, Krista
Presslee, Sam
Lucquin, Alexandre
Tsybriy, Viktor
Mazurkevich, Andrey
Tsybriy, Andrey
Jordan, Peter
Heron, Carl
Meadows, John
Craig, Oliver E.
author_sort Bondetti, Manon
collection PubMed
description The emergence of pottery in Europe is associated with two distinct traditions: hunter-gatherers in the east of the continent during the early 6th millennium BC and early agricultural communities in the south-west in the late 7th millennium BC. Here we investigate the function of pottery from the site of Rakushechny Yar, located at the Southern fringe of Eastern Europe, in this putative contact zone between these two economic ‘worlds’. To investigate, organic residue analysis was conducted on 120 samples from the Early Neolithic phase (ca. mid-6(th) millennium BC) along with microscopic and SEM analysis of associated foodcrusts. The results showed that the earliest phase of pottery use was predominantly used to process riverine resources. Many of the vessels have molecular and isotopic characteristics consistent with migratory fish, such as sturgeon, confirmed by the identification of sturgeon bony structures embedded in the charred surface deposits. There was no evidence of dairy products in any of the vessels, despite the fact these have been routinely identified in coeval sites to the south. Further analysis of some of the mammalian bones using ZooMS failed to demonstrate that domesticated animals were present in the Early Neolithic. Nevertheless, we argue that intensive exploitation of seasonally migratory fish, accompanied by large-scale pottery production, created storable surpluses that led to similar socio-economic outcomes as documented in early agricultural societies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8550616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85506162021-11-10 Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia) Bondetti, Manon González Carretero, Lara Dolbunova, Ekaterina McGrath, Krista Presslee, Sam Lucquin, Alexandre Tsybriy, Viktor Mazurkevich, Andrey Tsybriy, Andrey Jordan, Peter Heron, Carl Meadows, John Craig, Oliver E. Archaeol Anthropol Sci Original Paper The emergence of pottery in Europe is associated with two distinct traditions: hunter-gatherers in the east of the continent during the early 6th millennium BC and early agricultural communities in the south-west in the late 7th millennium BC. Here we investigate the function of pottery from the site of Rakushechny Yar, located at the Southern fringe of Eastern Europe, in this putative contact zone between these two economic ‘worlds’. To investigate, organic residue analysis was conducted on 120 samples from the Early Neolithic phase (ca. mid-6(th) millennium BC) along with microscopic and SEM analysis of associated foodcrusts. The results showed that the earliest phase of pottery use was predominantly used to process riverine resources. Many of the vessels have molecular and isotopic characteristics consistent with migratory fish, such as sturgeon, confirmed by the identification of sturgeon bony structures embedded in the charred surface deposits. There was no evidence of dairy products in any of the vessels, despite the fact these have been routinely identified in coeval sites to the south. Further analysis of some of the mammalian bones using ZooMS failed to demonstrate that domesticated animals were present in the Early Neolithic. Nevertheless, we argue that intensive exploitation of seasonally migratory fish, accompanied by large-scale pottery production, created storable surpluses that led to similar socio-economic outcomes as documented in early agricultural societies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550616/ /pubmed/34777611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2 Text en © Crown 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bondetti, Manon
González Carretero, Lara
Dolbunova, Ekaterina
McGrath, Krista
Presslee, Sam
Lucquin, Alexandre
Tsybriy, Viktor
Mazurkevich, Andrey
Tsybriy, Andrey
Jordan, Peter
Heron, Carl
Meadows, John
Craig, Oliver E.
Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia)
title Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia)
title_full Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia)
title_fullStr Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia)
title_full_unstemmed Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia)
title_short Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia)
title_sort neolithic farmers or neolithic foragers? organic residue analysis of early pottery from rakushechny yar on the lower don (russia)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bondettimanon neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT gonzalezcarreterolara neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT dolbunovaekaterina neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT mcgrathkrista neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT pressleesam neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT lucquinalexandre neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT tsybriyviktor neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT mazurkevichandrey neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT tsybriyandrey neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT jordanpeter neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT heroncarl neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT meadowsjohn neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia
AT craigolivere neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia