Cargando…
Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia)
The emergence of pottery in Europe is associated with two distinct traditions: hunter-gatherers in the east of the continent during the early 6th millennium BC and early agricultural communities in the south-west in the late 7th millennium BC. Here we investigate the function of pottery from the sit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2 |
_version_ | 1784590992478830592 |
---|---|
author | Bondetti, Manon González Carretero, Lara Dolbunova, Ekaterina McGrath, Krista Presslee, Sam Lucquin, Alexandre Tsybriy, Viktor Mazurkevich, Andrey Tsybriy, Andrey Jordan, Peter Heron, Carl Meadows, John Craig, Oliver E. |
author_facet | Bondetti, Manon González Carretero, Lara Dolbunova, Ekaterina McGrath, Krista Presslee, Sam Lucquin, Alexandre Tsybriy, Viktor Mazurkevich, Andrey Tsybriy, Andrey Jordan, Peter Heron, Carl Meadows, John Craig, Oliver E. |
author_sort | Bondetti, Manon |
collection | PubMed |
description | The emergence of pottery in Europe is associated with two distinct traditions: hunter-gatherers in the east of the continent during the early 6th millennium BC and early agricultural communities in the south-west in the late 7th millennium BC. Here we investigate the function of pottery from the site of Rakushechny Yar, located at the Southern fringe of Eastern Europe, in this putative contact zone between these two economic ‘worlds’. To investigate, organic residue analysis was conducted on 120 samples from the Early Neolithic phase (ca. mid-6(th) millennium BC) along with microscopic and SEM analysis of associated foodcrusts. The results showed that the earliest phase of pottery use was predominantly used to process riverine resources. Many of the vessels have molecular and isotopic characteristics consistent with migratory fish, such as sturgeon, confirmed by the identification of sturgeon bony structures embedded in the charred surface deposits. There was no evidence of dairy products in any of the vessels, despite the fact these have been routinely identified in coeval sites to the south. Further analysis of some of the mammalian bones using ZooMS failed to demonstrate that domesticated animals were present in the Early Neolithic. Nevertheless, we argue that intensive exploitation of seasonally migratory fish, accompanied by large-scale pottery production, created storable surpluses that led to similar socio-economic outcomes as documented in early agricultural societies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8550616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85506162021-11-10 Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia) Bondetti, Manon González Carretero, Lara Dolbunova, Ekaterina McGrath, Krista Presslee, Sam Lucquin, Alexandre Tsybriy, Viktor Mazurkevich, Andrey Tsybriy, Andrey Jordan, Peter Heron, Carl Meadows, John Craig, Oliver E. Archaeol Anthropol Sci Original Paper The emergence of pottery in Europe is associated with two distinct traditions: hunter-gatherers in the east of the continent during the early 6th millennium BC and early agricultural communities in the south-west in the late 7th millennium BC. Here we investigate the function of pottery from the site of Rakushechny Yar, located at the Southern fringe of Eastern Europe, in this putative contact zone between these two economic ‘worlds’. To investigate, organic residue analysis was conducted on 120 samples from the Early Neolithic phase (ca. mid-6(th) millennium BC) along with microscopic and SEM analysis of associated foodcrusts. The results showed that the earliest phase of pottery use was predominantly used to process riverine resources. Many of the vessels have molecular and isotopic characteristics consistent with migratory fish, such as sturgeon, confirmed by the identification of sturgeon bony structures embedded in the charred surface deposits. There was no evidence of dairy products in any of the vessels, despite the fact these have been routinely identified in coeval sites to the south. Further analysis of some of the mammalian bones using ZooMS failed to demonstrate that domesticated animals were present in the Early Neolithic. Nevertheless, we argue that intensive exploitation of seasonally migratory fish, accompanied by large-scale pottery production, created storable surpluses that led to similar socio-economic outcomes as documented in early agricultural societies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550616/ /pubmed/34777611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2 Text en © Crown 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Bondetti, Manon González Carretero, Lara Dolbunova, Ekaterina McGrath, Krista Presslee, Sam Lucquin, Alexandre Tsybriy, Viktor Mazurkevich, Andrey Tsybriy, Andrey Jordan, Peter Heron, Carl Meadows, John Craig, Oliver E. Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia) |
title | Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia) |
title_full | Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia) |
title_fullStr | Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia) |
title_full_unstemmed | Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia) |
title_short | Neolithic farmers or Neolithic foragers? Organic residue analysis of early pottery from Rakushechny Yar on the Lower Don (Russia) |
title_sort | neolithic farmers or neolithic foragers? organic residue analysis of early pottery from rakushechny yar on the lower don (russia) |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01412-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bondettimanon neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT gonzalezcarreterolara neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT dolbunovaekaterina neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT mcgrathkrista neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT pressleesam neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT lucquinalexandre neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT tsybriyviktor neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT mazurkevichandrey neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT tsybriyandrey neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT jordanpeter neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT heroncarl neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT meadowsjohn neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia AT craigolivere neolithicfarmersorneolithicforagersorganicresidueanalysisofearlypotteryfromrakushechnyyaronthelowerdonrussia |