Cargando…

On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic tau decays

In this article we review the results of our recent work on the difference between the Borel representations of [Formula: see text] hadronic spectral function moments obtained with the CIPT and FOPT methods. For the presentation of the theoretical results we focus on the large-[Formula: see text] ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoang, André H., Regner, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00257-z
_version_ 1784590999280943104
author Hoang, André H.
Regner, Christoph
author_facet Hoang, André H.
Regner, Christoph
author_sort Hoang, André H.
collection PubMed
description In this article we review the results of our recent work on the difference between the Borel representations of [Formula: see text] hadronic spectral function moments obtained with the CIPT and FOPT methods. For the presentation of the theoretical results we focus on the large-[Formula: see text] approximation, where all expressions can be written down in closed form, and we comment on the generalization to full QCD. The results may explain the discrepancy in the behavior of the FOPT and CIPT series that has been the topic of intense discussions in previous literature and which represents a major part of the theoretical uncertainties in current strong coupling determinations from hadronic [Formula: see text] decays. The findings also imply that the OPE corrections for FOPT and CIPT differ and that the OPE corrections for CIPT do not have standard form.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8550648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85506482021-11-10 On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic tau decays Hoang, André H. Regner, Christoph Eur Phys J Spec Top Review In this article we review the results of our recent work on the difference between the Borel representations of [Formula: see text] hadronic spectral function moments obtained with the CIPT and FOPT methods. For the presentation of the theoretical results we focus on the large-[Formula: see text] approximation, where all expressions can be written down in closed form, and we comment on the generalization to full QCD. The results may explain the discrepancy in the behavior of the FOPT and CIPT series that has been the topic of intense discussions in previous literature and which represents a major part of the theoretical uncertainties in current strong coupling determinations from hadronic [Formula: see text] decays. The findings also imply that the OPE corrections for FOPT and CIPT differ and that the OPE corrections for CIPT do not have standard form. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550648/ /pubmed/34777699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00257-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Hoang, André H.
Regner, Christoph
On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic tau decays
title On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic tau decays
title_full On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic tau decays
title_fullStr On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic tau decays
title_full_unstemmed On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic tau decays
title_short On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic tau decays
title_sort on the difference between fopt and cipt for hadronic tau decays
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00257-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hoangandreh onthedifferencebetweenfoptandciptforhadronictaudecays
AT regnerchristoph onthedifferencebetweenfoptandciptforhadronictaudecays