Cargando…

Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities

A paramount challenge in coral reef ecology is to estimate the abundance and composition of the communities residing in such complex ecosystems. Traditional 2D projected surface cover estimates neglect the 3D structure of reefs and reef organisms, overlook communities residing in cryptic reef habita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kornder, Niklas A., Cappelletto, Jose, Mueller, Benjamin, Zalm, Margaretha J. L., Martinez, Stephanie J., Vermeij, Mark J. A., Huisman, Jef, de Goeij, Jasper M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00338-021-02118-6
_version_ 1784591028970323968
author Kornder, Niklas A.
Cappelletto, Jose
Mueller, Benjamin
Zalm, Margaretha J. L.
Martinez, Stephanie J.
Vermeij, Mark J. A.
Huisman, Jef
de Goeij, Jasper M.
author_facet Kornder, Niklas A.
Cappelletto, Jose
Mueller, Benjamin
Zalm, Margaretha J. L.
Martinez, Stephanie J.
Vermeij, Mark J. A.
Huisman, Jef
de Goeij, Jasper M.
author_sort Kornder, Niklas A.
collection PubMed
description A paramount challenge in coral reef ecology is to estimate the abundance and composition of the communities residing in such complex ecosystems. Traditional 2D projected surface cover estimates neglect the 3D structure of reefs and reef organisms, overlook communities residing in cryptic reef habitats (e.g., overhangs, cavities), and thus may fail to represent biomass estimates needed to assess trophic ecology and reef function. Here, we surveyed the 3D surface cover, biovolume, and biomass (i.e., ash-free dry weight) of all major benthic taxa on 12 coral reef stations on the island of Curaçao (Southern Caribbean) using structure-from-motion photogrammetry, coral point counts, in situ measurements, and elemental analysis. We then compared our 3D benthic community estimates to corresponding estimates of traditional 2D projected surface cover to explore the differences in benthic community composition using different metrics. Overall, 2D cover was dominated (52 ± 2%, mean ± SE) by non-calcifying phototrophs (macroalgae, turf algae, benthic cyanobacterial mats), but their contribution to total reef biomass was minor (3.2 ± 0.6%). In contrast, coral cover (32 ± 2%) more closely resembled coral biomass (27 ± 6%). The relative contribution of erect organisms, such as gorgonians and massive sponges, to 2D cover was twofold and 11-fold lower, respectively, than their contribution to reef biomass. Cryptic surface area (3.3 ± 0.2 m(2) m(−2)(planar reef)) comprised half of the total reef substrate, rendering two thirds of coralline algae and almost all encrusting sponges (99.8%) undetected in traditional assessments. Yet, encrusting sponges dominated reef biomass (35 ± 18%). Based on our quantification of exposed and cryptic reef communities using different metrics, we suggest adjustments to current monitoring approaches and highlight ramifications for evaluating the ecological contributions of different taxa to overall reef function. To this end, our metric conversions can complement other benthic assessments to generate non-invasive estimates of the biovolume, biomass, and elemental composition (i.e., standing stocks of organic carbon and nitrogen) of Caribbean coral reef communities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00338-021-02118-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8550779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85507792021-10-29 Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities Kornder, Niklas A. Cappelletto, Jose Mueller, Benjamin Zalm, Margaretha J. L. Martinez, Stephanie J. Vermeij, Mark J. A. Huisman, Jef de Goeij, Jasper M. Coral Reefs Report A paramount challenge in coral reef ecology is to estimate the abundance and composition of the communities residing in such complex ecosystems. Traditional 2D projected surface cover estimates neglect the 3D structure of reefs and reef organisms, overlook communities residing in cryptic reef habitats (e.g., overhangs, cavities), and thus may fail to represent biomass estimates needed to assess trophic ecology and reef function. Here, we surveyed the 3D surface cover, biovolume, and biomass (i.e., ash-free dry weight) of all major benthic taxa on 12 coral reef stations on the island of Curaçao (Southern Caribbean) using structure-from-motion photogrammetry, coral point counts, in situ measurements, and elemental analysis. We then compared our 3D benthic community estimates to corresponding estimates of traditional 2D projected surface cover to explore the differences in benthic community composition using different metrics. Overall, 2D cover was dominated (52 ± 2%, mean ± SE) by non-calcifying phototrophs (macroalgae, turf algae, benthic cyanobacterial mats), but their contribution to total reef biomass was minor (3.2 ± 0.6%). In contrast, coral cover (32 ± 2%) more closely resembled coral biomass (27 ± 6%). The relative contribution of erect organisms, such as gorgonians and massive sponges, to 2D cover was twofold and 11-fold lower, respectively, than their contribution to reef biomass. Cryptic surface area (3.3 ± 0.2 m(2) m(−2)(planar reef)) comprised half of the total reef substrate, rendering two thirds of coralline algae and almost all encrusting sponges (99.8%) undetected in traditional assessments. Yet, encrusting sponges dominated reef biomass (35 ± 18%). Based on our quantification of exposed and cryptic reef communities using different metrics, we suggest adjustments to current monitoring approaches and highlight ramifications for evaluating the ecological contributions of different taxa to overall reef function. To this end, our metric conversions can complement other benthic assessments to generate non-invasive estimates of the biovolume, biomass, and elemental composition (i.e., standing stocks of organic carbon and nitrogen) of Caribbean coral reef communities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00338-021-02118-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550779/ /pubmed/34720372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00338-021-02118-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Report
Kornder, Niklas A.
Cappelletto, Jose
Mueller, Benjamin
Zalm, Margaretha J. L.
Martinez, Stephanie J.
Vermeij, Mark J. A.
Huisman, Jef
de Goeij, Jasper M.
Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities
title Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities
title_full Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities
title_fullStr Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities
title_full_unstemmed Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities
title_short Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities
title_sort implications of 2d versus 3d surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00338-021-02118-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kornderniklasa implicationsof2dversus3dsurveystomeasuretheabundanceandcompositionofbenthiccoralreefcommunities
AT cappellettojose implicationsof2dversus3dsurveystomeasuretheabundanceandcompositionofbenthiccoralreefcommunities
AT muellerbenjamin implicationsof2dversus3dsurveystomeasuretheabundanceandcompositionofbenthiccoralreefcommunities
AT zalmmargarethajl implicationsof2dversus3dsurveystomeasuretheabundanceandcompositionofbenthiccoralreefcommunities
AT martinezstephaniej implicationsof2dversus3dsurveystomeasuretheabundanceandcompositionofbenthiccoralreefcommunities
AT vermeijmarkja implicationsof2dversus3dsurveystomeasuretheabundanceandcompositionofbenthiccoralreefcommunities
AT huismanjef implicationsof2dversus3dsurveystomeasuretheabundanceandcompositionofbenthiccoralreefcommunities
AT degoeijjasperm implicationsof2dversus3dsurveystomeasuretheabundanceandcompositionofbenthiccoralreefcommunities