Cargando…

Social relationships, living arrangements and loneliness

BACKGROUND: Oldest-old people are expected to be particularly likely to experience loneliness due to the loss of their intimate partner or of same-aged social network members. It is assumed that individuals in different living arrangements maintain different kinds of social networks because they adj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitz, W., Mauritz, S., Wagner, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34415385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-021-01960-1
_version_ 1784591080219475968
author Schmitz, W.
Mauritz, S.
Wagner, M.
author_facet Schmitz, W.
Mauritz, S.
Wagner, M.
author_sort Schmitz, W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oldest-old people are expected to be particularly likely to experience loneliness due to the loss of their intimate partner or of same-aged social network members. It is assumed that individuals in different living arrangements maintain different kinds of social networks because they adjust their networks to their specific needs. However, not much is known about the variation in the social networks of the oldest-old depending on their living arrangements and how this variation is related to loneliness. This is the first study that seeks to fill this research gap by examining how the composition and the size of a social network varies among the oldest-old depending on their living arrangements with a partner (coresidential partnership, living apart together (LAT) partnership, no partnership), and how this variation contributes to explain loneliness among the oldest-old. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from the representative survey NRW80+ (Quality of Life and Well-Being of the Very Old in North-Rhine Westphalia). The sample of analysis used in this study consists of 1860 respondents from the German state of North-Rhine Westphalia aged 80 years and older. Associations between social network characteristics and living arrangements were tested using χ(2)-tests and one-way ANOVA. Ordered logit models were used to explain loneliness. RESULTS: Respondents in a coresidential partnership maintained larger social networks than those in an LAT partnership and those with no intimate partner. Furthermore, the respondents with no partner maintained more diverse social networks. Compared to those in the other living arrangements, the respondents in an LAT partnership maintained the smallest and least diverse social networks. Being in a coresidential partnership and the social network size were found to be negatively associated with loneliness. CONCLUSION: First, the results indicate that respondents who do not have a partner adjusted their social networks to meet their needs in the absence of this relationship. Second, we conclude that being in a coresidential partnership and having a large social network protects the oldest-old against loneliness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00391-021-01960-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8551096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85510962021-10-29 Social relationships, living arrangements and loneliness Schmitz, W. Mauritz, S. Wagner, M. Z Gerontol Geriatr Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Oldest-old people are expected to be particularly likely to experience loneliness due to the loss of their intimate partner or of same-aged social network members. It is assumed that individuals in different living arrangements maintain different kinds of social networks because they adjust their networks to their specific needs. However, not much is known about the variation in the social networks of the oldest-old depending on their living arrangements and how this variation is related to loneliness. This is the first study that seeks to fill this research gap by examining how the composition and the size of a social network varies among the oldest-old depending on their living arrangements with a partner (coresidential partnership, living apart together (LAT) partnership, no partnership), and how this variation contributes to explain loneliness among the oldest-old. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from the representative survey NRW80+ (Quality of Life and Well-Being of the Very Old in North-Rhine Westphalia). The sample of analysis used in this study consists of 1860 respondents from the German state of North-Rhine Westphalia aged 80 years and older. Associations between social network characteristics and living arrangements were tested using χ(2)-tests and one-way ANOVA. Ordered logit models were used to explain loneliness. RESULTS: Respondents in a coresidential partnership maintained larger social networks than those in an LAT partnership and those with no intimate partner. Furthermore, the respondents with no partner maintained more diverse social networks. Compared to those in the other living arrangements, the respondents in an LAT partnership maintained the smallest and least diverse social networks. Being in a coresidential partnership and the social network size were found to be negatively associated with loneliness. CONCLUSION: First, the results indicate that respondents who do not have a partner adjusted their social networks to meet their needs in the absence of this relationship. Second, we conclude that being in a coresidential partnership and having a large social network protects the oldest-old against loneliness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00391-021-01960-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Medizin 2021-08-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8551096/ /pubmed/34415385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-021-01960-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Schmitz, W.
Mauritz, S.
Wagner, M.
Social relationships, living arrangements and loneliness
title Social relationships, living arrangements and loneliness
title_full Social relationships, living arrangements and loneliness
title_fullStr Social relationships, living arrangements and loneliness
title_full_unstemmed Social relationships, living arrangements and loneliness
title_short Social relationships, living arrangements and loneliness
title_sort social relationships, living arrangements and loneliness
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34415385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-021-01960-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schmitzw socialrelationshipslivingarrangementsandloneliness
AT mauritzs socialrelationshipslivingarrangementsandloneliness
AT wagnerm socialrelationshipslivingarrangementsandloneliness