Cargando…
Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab
BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune blistering diseases, potentially life-threatening. Rituximab received FDA approval in June 2018 for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with pemphigus, resistan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2021.100142 |
_version_ | 1784591205221269504 |
---|---|
author | Perifani, Vagiani Dalamaga, Maria Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos Theotokoglou, Sofia Syrmali, Anna Loumou, Panagiota Papadavid, Evangelia |
author_facet | Perifani, Vagiani Dalamaga, Maria Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos Theotokoglou, Sofia Syrmali, Anna Loumou, Panagiota Papadavid, Evangelia |
author_sort | Perifani, Vagiani |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune blistering diseases, potentially life-threatening. Rituximab received FDA approval in June 2018 for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with pemphigus, resistant to previous therapies or unable to receive classic immunosuppressive treatment due to serious adverse events or comorbidities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients (9 men, 16 women), mean age 49.4 ± 15.9 years (range 21–74 years), mean disease duration 4 ± 2.7 years (range 0.25–10 years) were included in the study: 19 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 6 with pemphigus foliaceous. The efficacy of rituximab was evaluated according to the control of disease, retention of remission, disease severity, previous treatments and adverse reactions. During COVID-19 pandemic patients are monitored closely through tele-dermatology. RESULTS: Twenty-three out of 25 patients had great improvement, 2 out of 25 ceased therapy due to adverse events (arthralgias and dyspnea). Sixteen out of 23 received additional course after 8 months (range 5–60 months). More aged patients presented more frequently adverse events and underwent additional courses (p = 0.002). Rituximab was found superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment in terms of efficacy and safety, with larger periods of remission and lower doses of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. No major adverse events were noticed. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is a very effective treatment of pemphigus and, remarkably, superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8551647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85516472021-11-04 Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab Perifani, Vagiani Dalamaga, Maria Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos Theotokoglou, Sofia Syrmali, Anna Loumou, Panagiota Papadavid, Evangelia Metabol Open Original Research Paper BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune blistering diseases, potentially life-threatening. Rituximab received FDA approval in June 2018 for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with pemphigus, resistant to previous therapies or unable to receive classic immunosuppressive treatment due to serious adverse events or comorbidities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients (9 men, 16 women), mean age 49.4 ± 15.9 years (range 21–74 years), mean disease duration 4 ± 2.7 years (range 0.25–10 years) were included in the study: 19 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 6 with pemphigus foliaceous. The efficacy of rituximab was evaluated according to the control of disease, retention of remission, disease severity, previous treatments and adverse reactions. During COVID-19 pandemic patients are monitored closely through tele-dermatology. RESULTS: Twenty-three out of 25 patients had great improvement, 2 out of 25 ceased therapy due to adverse events (arthralgias and dyspnea). Sixteen out of 23 received additional course after 8 months (range 5–60 months). More aged patients presented more frequently adverse events and underwent additional courses (p = 0.002). Rituximab was found superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment in terms of efficacy and safety, with larger periods of remission and lower doses of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. No major adverse events were noticed. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is a very effective treatment of pemphigus and, remarkably, superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment. Elsevier 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8551647/ /pubmed/34746731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2021.100142 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Paper Perifani, Vagiani Dalamaga, Maria Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos Theotokoglou, Sofia Syrmali, Anna Loumou, Panagiota Papadavid, Evangelia Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab |
title | Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab |
title_full | Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab |
title_fullStr | Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab |
title_full_unstemmed | Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab |
title_short | Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab |
title_sort | real world evidence: patients with refractory pemphigus treated with rituximab |
topic | Original Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2021.100142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perifanivagiani realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab AT dalamagamaria realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab AT theodoropouloskonstantinos realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab AT theotokoglousofia realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab AT syrmalianna realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab AT loumoupanagiota realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab AT papadavidevangelia realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab |