Cargando…

Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune blistering diseases, potentially life-threatening. Rituximab received FDA approval in June 2018 for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with pemphigus, resistan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perifani, Vagiani, Dalamaga, Maria, Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos, Theotokoglou, Sofia, Syrmali, Anna, Loumou, Panagiota, Papadavid, Evangelia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2021.100142
_version_ 1784591205221269504
author Perifani, Vagiani
Dalamaga, Maria
Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos
Theotokoglou, Sofia
Syrmali, Anna
Loumou, Panagiota
Papadavid, Evangelia
author_facet Perifani, Vagiani
Dalamaga, Maria
Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos
Theotokoglou, Sofia
Syrmali, Anna
Loumou, Panagiota
Papadavid, Evangelia
author_sort Perifani, Vagiani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune blistering diseases, potentially life-threatening. Rituximab received FDA approval in June 2018 for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with pemphigus, resistant to previous therapies or unable to receive classic immunosuppressive treatment due to serious adverse events or comorbidities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients (9 men, 16 women), mean age 49.4 ± 15.9 years (range 21–74 years), mean disease duration 4 ± 2.7 years (range 0.25–10 years) were included in the study: 19 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 6 with pemphigus foliaceous. The efficacy of rituximab was evaluated according to the control of disease, retention of remission, disease severity, previous treatments and adverse reactions. During COVID-19 pandemic patients are monitored closely through tele-dermatology. RESULTS: Twenty-three out of 25 patients had great improvement, 2 out of 25 ceased therapy due to adverse events (arthralgias and dyspnea). Sixteen out of 23 received additional course after 8 months (range 5–60 months). More aged patients presented more frequently adverse events and underwent additional courses (p = 0.002). Rituximab was found superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment in terms of efficacy and safety, with larger periods of remission and lower doses of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. No major adverse events were noticed. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is a very effective treatment of pemphigus and, remarkably, superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8551647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85516472021-11-04 Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab Perifani, Vagiani Dalamaga, Maria Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos Theotokoglou, Sofia Syrmali, Anna Loumou, Panagiota Papadavid, Evangelia Metabol Open Original Research Paper BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune blistering diseases, potentially life-threatening. Rituximab received FDA approval in June 2018 for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with pemphigus, resistant to previous therapies or unable to receive classic immunosuppressive treatment due to serious adverse events or comorbidities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients (9 men, 16 women), mean age 49.4 ± 15.9 years (range 21–74 years), mean disease duration 4 ± 2.7 years (range 0.25–10 years) were included in the study: 19 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 6 with pemphigus foliaceous. The efficacy of rituximab was evaluated according to the control of disease, retention of remission, disease severity, previous treatments and adverse reactions. During COVID-19 pandemic patients are monitored closely through tele-dermatology. RESULTS: Twenty-three out of 25 patients had great improvement, 2 out of 25 ceased therapy due to adverse events (arthralgias and dyspnea). Sixteen out of 23 received additional course after 8 months (range 5–60 months). More aged patients presented more frequently adverse events and underwent additional courses (p = 0.002). Rituximab was found superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment in terms of efficacy and safety, with larger periods of remission and lower doses of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. No major adverse events were noticed. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is a very effective treatment of pemphigus and, remarkably, superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment. Elsevier 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8551647/ /pubmed/34746731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2021.100142 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Paper
Perifani, Vagiani
Dalamaga, Maria
Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos
Theotokoglou, Sofia
Syrmali, Anna
Loumou, Panagiota
Papadavid, Evangelia
Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab
title Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab
title_full Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab
title_fullStr Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab
title_full_unstemmed Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab
title_short Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab
title_sort real world evidence: patients with refractory pemphigus treated with rituximab
topic Original Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2021.100142
work_keys_str_mv AT perifanivagiani realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab
AT dalamagamaria realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab
AT theodoropouloskonstantinos realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab
AT theotokoglousofia realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab
AT syrmalianna realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab
AT loumoupanagiota realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab
AT papadavidevangelia realworldevidencepatientswithrefractorypemphigustreatedwithrituximab