Cargando…

Harmonisation and Between-Country Differences of the Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire in Older Adults

Background: The Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire (LEQ) assesses complex mental activity across the life-course and has been associated with brain and cognitive health. The different education systems and occupation classifications across countries represent a challenge for international compari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ourry, Valentin, Marchant, Natalie L., Schild, Ann-Katrin, Coll-Padros, Nina, Klimecki, Olga M., Krolak-Salmon, Pierre, Goldet, Karine, Reyrolle, Leslie, Bachelet, Romain, Sannemann, Lena, Meiberth, Dix, Demnitz-King, Harriet, Whitfield, Tim, Botton, Maëlle, Lebahar, Julie, Gonneaud, Julie, de Flores, Robin, Molinuevo, José Luis, Jessen, Frank, Vivien, Denis, de la Sayette, Vincent, Valenzuela, Michael J., Rauchs, Géraldine, Wirth, Miranka, Chételat, Gaël, Arenaza-Urquijo, Eider M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.740005
Descripción
Sumario:Background: The Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire (LEQ) assesses complex mental activity across the life-course and has been associated with brain and cognitive health. The different education systems and occupation classifications across countries represent a challenge for international comparisons. The objectives of this study were four-fold: to adapt and harmonise the LEQ across four European countries, assess its validity across countries, explore its association with brain and cognition and begin to investigate between-country differences in life-course mental activities. Method: The LEQ was administered to 359 cognitively unimpaired older adults (mean age and education: 71.2, 13.2 years) from IMAP and EU-funded Medit-Ageing projects. Education systems, classification of occupations and scoring guidelines were adapted to allow comparisons between France, Germany, Spain and United Kingdom. We assessed the LEQ's (i) concurrent validity with a similar instrument (cognitive activities questionnaire - CAQ) and its structural validity by testing the factors' structure across countries, (ii) we investigated its association with cognition and neuroimaging, and (iii) compared its scores between countries. Results: The LEQ showed moderate to strong positive associations with the CAQ and revealed a stable multidimensional structure across countries that was similar to the original LEQ. The LEQ was positively associated with global cognition. Between-country differences were observed in leisure activities across the life-course. Conclusions: The LEQ is a promising tool for assessing the multidimensional construct of cognitive reserve and can be used to measure socio-behavioural determinants of cognitive reserve in older adults across countries. Longitudinal studies are warranted to test further its clinical utility.