Cargando…
Correlation between WHO and Modified WHO Classification Systems in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Oral Lichen Planus Using Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability
BACKGROUND: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a relatively common chronic autoimmune disease. In the present study, we tried to correlate the histopathological criteria of WHO and modified WHO (mod.WHO) classification systems using two methods, namely, intraobserver and interobserver observations in these...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760137 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_566_18 |
_version_ | 1784591241996926976 |
---|---|
author | Jolehar, Maryam Mohseni, Roghieh Farhadi, Sareh |
author_facet | Jolehar, Maryam Mohseni, Roghieh Farhadi, Sareh |
author_sort | Jolehar, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a relatively common chronic autoimmune disease. In the present study, we tried to correlate the histopathological criteria of WHO and modified WHO (mod.WHO) classification systems using two methods, namely, intraobserver and interobserver observations in these samples. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 64 microscopic slides with the diagnosis of the OLP lesions, based on both clinical and histopathological features. At first, each pathologist individually (as intraobserver) examined microscopic slides based on both histopathologic diagnostic criteria. Later, three pathologists in a group (as interobserver) reevaluated microscopic slides 2 months later in the second phase of the study, based on both systems. Eventually, the findings were statistically analyzed with Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) and reported. RESULTS: According to the results, the lichen planus was detected in 8 cases using the WHO method, and in 41 cases using the Mod.WHO method. Intrarater Kappa coefficients were κ = 0.114, P = 0.299; κ = 0.181, P = 0.012; and κ = 0.062, P = 0.424 for three pathologists, respectively. The findings showed no reproducibility (κ = 0.148, P = 0.024) and there was no correlation between the two systems. Statistical analysis revealed that the histopathological criteria of the WHO classification for detecting the lichen planus microscopy were more sensitive but the Mod.WHO classification criteria were more specific for detecting the lichen planus. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the higher specificity of the histopathological criteria of Mod.WHO classification rather than WHO classification, it seems that Mod.WHO classification has more important and useful criteria for histopathological diagnosis. Finally, we can conclude that the use histopathologic criteria of the Mod.WHO classification is more useful in the diagnosis of lichen planus, although it should be in combination with clinical information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8551796 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85517962021-11-09 Correlation between WHO and Modified WHO Classification Systems in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Oral Lichen Planus Using Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability Jolehar, Maryam Mohseni, Roghieh Farhadi, Sareh Int J Prev Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a relatively common chronic autoimmune disease. In the present study, we tried to correlate the histopathological criteria of WHO and modified WHO (mod.WHO) classification systems using two methods, namely, intraobserver and interobserver observations in these samples. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 64 microscopic slides with the diagnosis of the OLP lesions, based on both clinical and histopathological features. At first, each pathologist individually (as intraobserver) examined microscopic slides based on both histopathologic diagnostic criteria. Later, three pathologists in a group (as interobserver) reevaluated microscopic slides 2 months later in the second phase of the study, based on both systems. Eventually, the findings were statistically analyzed with Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) and reported. RESULTS: According to the results, the lichen planus was detected in 8 cases using the WHO method, and in 41 cases using the Mod.WHO method. Intrarater Kappa coefficients were κ = 0.114, P = 0.299; κ = 0.181, P = 0.012; and κ = 0.062, P = 0.424 for three pathologists, respectively. The findings showed no reproducibility (κ = 0.148, P = 0.024) and there was no correlation between the two systems. Statistical analysis revealed that the histopathological criteria of the WHO classification for detecting the lichen planus microscopy were more sensitive but the Mod.WHO classification criteria were more specific for detecting the lichen planus. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the higher specificity of the histopathological criteria of Mod.WHO classification rather than WHO classification, it seems that Mod.WHO classification has more important and useful criteria for histopathological diagnosis. Finally, we can conclude that the use histopathologic criteria of the Mod.WHO classification is more useful in the diagnosis of lichen planus, although it should be in combination with clinical information. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8551796/ /pubmed/34760137 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_566_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 International Journal of Preventive Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jolehar, Maryam Mohseni, Roghieh Farhadi, Sareh Correlation between WHO and Modified WHO Classification Systems in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Oral Lichen Planus Using Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability |
title | Correlation between WHO and Modified WHO Classification Systems in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Oral Lichen Planus Using Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability |
title_full | Correlation between WHO and Modified WHO Classification Systems in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Oral Lichen Planus Using Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability |
title_fullStr | Correlation between WHO and Modified WHO Classification Systems in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Oral Lichen Planus Using Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation between WHO and Modified WHO Classification Systems in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Oral Lichen Planus Using Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability |
title_short | Correlation between WHO and Modified WHO Classification Systems in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Oral Lichen Planus Using Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability |
title_sort | correlation between who and modified who classification systems in the histopathologic diagnosis of oral lichen planus using intraobserver and interobserver variability |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760137 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_566_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joleharmaryam correlationbetweenwhoandmodifiedwhoclassificationsystemsinthehistopathologicdiagnosisoforallichenplanususingintraobserverandinterobservervariability AT mohseniroghieh correlationbetweenwhoandmodifiedwhoclassificationsystemsinthehistopathologicdiagnosisoforallichenplanususingintraobserverandinterobservervariability AT farhadisareh correlationbetweenwhoandmodifiedwhoclassificationsystemsinthehistopathologicdiagnosisoforallichenplanususingintraobserverandinterobservervariability |