The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013–2017

The main characteristics of the 50 most highly cited reviews based on Scopus data, published in 2013–2017, have been studied. A detailed analysis of these reviews is given in terms of topic relevance, authors’ team authority, and sources rating. The majority of reviews were for medicine, chemistry,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagirova, A. V., Kosyakov, D. V., Guskov, A. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pleiades Publishing 2021
Materias:
Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551947/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/S0147688221030035
_version_ 1784591276626149376
author Bagirova, A. V.
Kosyakov, D. V.
Guskov, A. E.
author_facet Bagirova, A. V.
Kosyakov, D. V.
Guskov, A. E.
author_sort Bagirova, A. V.
collection PubMed
description The main characteristics of the 50 most highly cited reviews based on Scopus data, published in 2013–2017, have been studied. A detailed analysis of these reviews is given in terms of topic relevance, authors’ team authority, and sources rating. The majority of reviews were for medicine, chemistry, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Many of them were written with the participation of an authoritative expert group from the world’s leading scientific institutions as a regularly updated result review. The largest numbers of authors belonged to the G7 countries, China, and Switzerland. In comparison with these reviews, the Russian practice of preparing review publications has been considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8551947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Pleiades Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85519472021-10-28 The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013–2017 Bagirova, A. V. Kosyakov, D. V. Guskov, A. E. Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. Article The main characteristics of the 50 most highly cited reviews based on Scopus data, published in 2013–2017, have been studied. A detailed analysis of these reviews is given in terms of topic relevance, authors’ team authority, and sources rating. The majority of reviews were for medicine, chemistry, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Many of them were written with the participation of an authoritative expert group from the world’s leading scientific institutions as a regularly updated result review. The largest numbers of authors belonged to the G7 countries, China, and Switzerland. In comparison with these reviews, the Russian practice of preparing review publications has been considered. Pleiades Publishing 2021-10-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8551947/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/S0147688221030035 Text en © Allerton Press, Inc. 2021, ISSN 0147-6882, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 2021, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 168–184. © Allerton Press, Inc., 2021.Russian Text © The Author(s), 2021, published in Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i Metodika Informatsionnoi Raboty, 2021, No. 7, pp. 22–36. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Bagirova, A. V.
Kosyakov, D. V.
Guskov, A. E.
The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013–2017
title The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013–2017
title_full The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013–2017
title_fullStr The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013–2017
title_full_unstemmed The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013–2017
title_short The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013–2017
title_sort 50 most highly cited reviews of 2013–2017
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551947/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/S0147688221030035
work_keys_str_mv AT bagirovaav the50mosthighlycitedreviewsof20132017
AT kosyakovdv the50mosthighlycitedreviewsof20132017
AT guskovae the50mosthighlycitedreviewsof20132017
AT bagirovaav 50mosthighlycitedreviewsof20132017
AT kosyakovdv 50mosthighlycitedreviewsof20132017
AT guskovae 50mosthighlycitedreviewsof20132017

Ejemplares similares