Cargando…

Comparison of Design, Eligibility, and Outcomes of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Trials Initiated From 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020

IMPORTANCE: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have historically been grouped homogenously in clinical trials, despite their heterogeneity. Given the adoption of a more advanced pathologic classification system and drug licensure of several targeted therapies over the last decade, information is needed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Satya, Du, Liping, Lee, Cody L., Arhin, Nina D., Chan, Jennifer A., Kohn, Elise C., Halperin, Daniel M., Berlin, Jordan, LaFerriere, Heather, Singh, Simron, Kunz, Pamela L., Dasari, Arvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31744
_version_ 1784591302388613120
author Das, Satya
Du, Liping
Lee, Cody L.
Arhin, Nina D.
Chan, Jennifer A.
Kohn, Elise C.
Halperin, Daniel M.
Berlin, Jordan
LaFerriere, Heather
Singh, Simron
Kunz, Pamela L.
Dasari, Arvind
author_facet Das, Satya
Du, Liping
Lee, Cody L.
Arhin, Nina D.
Chan, Jennifer A.
Kohn, Elise C.
Halperin, Daniel M.
Berlin, Jordan
LaFerriere, Heather
Singh, Simron
Kunz, Pamela L.
Dasari, Arvind
author_sort Das, Satya
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have historically been grouped homogenously in clinical trials, despite their heterogeneity. Given the adoption of a more advanced pathologic classification system and drug licensure of several targeted therapies over the last decade, information is needed on whether study characteristics of NEN studies have evolved. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in study design, eligibility, accrual, sponsorship, and outcomes between phase II or III NEN clinical trials that began enrollment from 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study used a systematic survey of completed studies published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2020. Therapeutic phase II and III NEN studies were identified through a database search of Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE (OvidSP), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCOhost), Web of Science (Clarivate), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley), ClinicalTrials.gov (National Institutes of Health), EU Clinical Trials Register, and National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials. Data were analyzed between March and June 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Study characteristic proportions between the 2 enrollment periods. RESULTS: Of 3243 identified studies, 119 studies met criteria for inclusion, of which 117 studies (54 studies that began enrollment between 2000-2009 and 63 studies that began enrollment between 2010-2020) included exact dates of enrollment and were compared. Studies that began enrollment after 2010, compared with studies that began enrollment from 2000 to 2009, were less likely to include all NENs (13 studies [21%] vs 34 studies [63%]; P < .001) and more likely to include select NENs (eg, gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, 25 studies [40%] vs 11 studies [20%]; P = .02; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, 32 studies [51%] vs 16 studies [30%]; P = .02). Studies that began enrollment after 2010, compared with studies that began enrollment from 2000 to 2009, were more likely to specify tumor differentiation (59 studies [98%] vs 34 studies [63%]; P < .001) or Ki-67 index (23 studies [38%] vs 5 studies [9%]; P < .001) in inclusion criteria. Studies that began enrollment after 2010, compared with studies that began enrollment from 2000 to 2009, were more likely to use progression-free survival (22 studies [35%] vs 9 studies [18%]; P = .04) rather than objective response rate (19 studies [30%] vs 27 studies [53%]; P = .01) as a primary or coprimary end point. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that NEN trials enrolling over the last decade were more focused on select tumor populations, compared with studies that began enrollment before 2010. Despite this shift, more than 20% of studies still included all NENs. Studying novel agents in specific disease populations may enhance drug development in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8552059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85520592021-11-10 Comparison of Design, Eligibility, and Outcomes of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Trials Initiated From 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020 Das, Satya Du, Liping Lee, Cody L. Arhin, Nina D. Chan, Jennifer A. Kohn, Elise C. Halperin, Daniel M. Berlin, Jordan LaFerriere, Heather Singh, Simron Kunz, Pamela L. Dasari, Arvind JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have historically been grouped homogenously in clinical trials, despite their heterogeneity. Given the adoption of a more advanced pathologic classification system and drug licensure of several targeted therapies over the last decade, information is needed on whether study characteristics of NEN studies have evolved. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in study design, eligibility, accrual, sponsorship, and outcomes between phase II or III NEN clinical trials that began enrollment from 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study used a systematic survey of completed studies published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2020. Therapeutic phase II and III NEN studies were identified through a database search of Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE (OvidSP), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCOhost), Web of Science (Clarivate), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley), ClinicalTrials.gov (National Institutes of Health), EU Clinical Trials Register, and National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials. Data were analyzed between March and June 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Study characteristic proportions between the 2 enrollment periods. RESULTS: Of 3243 identified studies, 119 studies met criteria for inclusion, of which 117 studies (54 studies that began enrollment between 2000-2009 and 63 studies that began enrollment between 2010-2020) included exact dates of enrollment and were compared. Studies that began enrollment after 2010, compared with studies that began enrollment from 2000 to 2009, were less likely to include all NENs (13 studies [21%] vs 34 studies [63%]; P < .001) and more likely to include select NENs (eg, gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, 25 studies [40%] vs 11 studies [20%]; P = .02; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, 32 studies [51%] vs 16 studies [30%]; P = .02). Studies that began enrollment after 2010, compared with studies that began enrollment from 2000 to 2009, were more likely to specify tumor differentiation (59 studies [98%] vs 34 studies [63%]; P < .001) or Ki-67 index (23 studies [38%] vs 5 studies [9%]; P < .001) in inclusion criteria. Studies that began enrollment after 2010, compared with studies that began enrollment from 2000 to 2009, were more likely to use progression-free survival (22 studies [35%] vs 9 studies [18%]; P = .04) rather than objective response rate (19 studies [30%] vs 27 studies [53%]; P = .01) as a primary or coprimary end point. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that NEN trials enrolling over the last decade were more focused on select tumor populations, compared with studies that began enrollment before 2010. Despite this shift, more than 20% of studies still included all NENs. Studying novel agents in specific disease populations may enhance drug development in the field. American Medical Association 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8552059/ /pubmed/34705010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31744 Text en Copyright 2021 Das S et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Das, Satya
Du, Liping
Lee, Cody L.
Arhin, Nina D.
Chan, Jennifer A.
Kohn, Elise C.
Halperin, Daniel M.
Berlin, Jordan
LaFerriere, Heather
Singh, Simron
Kunz, Pamela L.
Dasari, Arvind
Comparison of Design, Eligibility, and Outcomes of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Trials Initiated From 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020
title Comparison of Design, Eligibility, and Outcomes of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Trials Initiated From 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020
title_full Comparison of Design, Eligibility, and Outcomes of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Trials Initiated From 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020
title_fullStr Comparison of Design, Eligibility, and Outcomes of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Trials Initiated From 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Design, Eligibility, and Outcomes of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Trials Initiated From 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020
title_short Comparison of Design, Eligibility, and Outcomes of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Trials Initiated From 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020
title_sort comparison of design, eligibility, and outcomes of neuroendocrine neoplasm trials initiated from 2000 to 2009 vs 2010 to 2020
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31744
work_keys_str_mv AT dassatya comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT duliping comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT leecodyl comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT arhinninad comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT chanjennifera comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT kohnelisec comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT halperindanielm comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT berlinjordan comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT laferriereheather comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT singhsimron comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT kunzpamelal comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020
AT dasariarvind comparisonofdesigneligibilityandoutcomesofneuroendocrineneoplasmtrialsinitiatedfrom2000to2009vs2010to2020