Cargando…

Validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic cough experience considerable burden. The cough severity visual analog scale (VAS) records patients’ assessment of cough severity on a 100-mm linear scale ranging from “no cough” (0 mm) to “worst cough” (100 mm). Although cough severity scales are widely used in c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin Nguyen, Allison, Bacci, Elizabeth D., Vernon, Margaret, Birring, Surinder S., Rosa, Carmen La, Muccino, David, Schelfhout, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17534666211049743
_version_ 1784591364576509952
author Martin Nguyen, Allison
Bacci, Elizabeth D.
Vernon, Margaret
Birring, Surinder S.
Rosa, Carmen La
Muccino, David
Schelfhout, Jonathan
author_facet Martin Nguyen, Allison
Bacci, Elizabeth D.
Vernon, Margaret
Birring, Surinder S.
Rosa, Carmen La
Muccino, David
Schelfhout, Jonathan
author_sort Martin Nguyen, Allison
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic cough experience considerable burden. The cough severity visual analog scale (VAS) records patients’ assessment of cough severity on a 100-mm linear scale ranging from “no cough” (0 mm) to “worst cough” (100 mm). Although cough severity scales are widely used in clinical practice and research, their use in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough has not been formally validated. METHODS: This analysis includes data from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial of the P2X3-receptor antagonist gefapixant for treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough (NCT02612610). Cough severity VAS scores were assessed at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The cough severity VAS was validated using several outcomes, including the Cough Severity Diary (CSD), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale, and objective cough frequency. Validation metrics included test–retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity, responsiveness, and score interpretation (i.e., clinically meaningful change threshold). RESULTS: The analysis included 253 patients (median age, 61.0 years; females, 76%). Test–retest reliability of the cough severity VAS was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.51). The cough severity VAS had acceptable convergent validity with other related measures (Pearson r of 0.53 and -0.41 for CSD and LCQ total scores, respectively; p < 0.0001 for each). Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences in mean cough severity VAS scores across severity groups defined using CSD, LCQ, and cough frequency tertiles. A large effect size was observed in patients with the greatest improvements in PGIC (Cohen d = -1.8). A ⩾ 30-mm reduction in the cough severity VAS was estimated as a clinically meaningful change threshold for clinical trials in chronic cough. CONCLUSIONS: The cough severity VAS is a valid and responsive measure. A cough severity VAS reduction of ⩾ 30 mm can discriminate clinically meaningful changes in chronic cough severity in clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8552382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85523822021-10-29 Validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough Martin Nguyen, Allison Bacci, Elizabeth D. Vernon, Margaret Birring, Surinder S. Rosa, Carmen La Muccino, David Schelfhout, Jonathan Ther Adv Respir Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic cough experience considerable burden. The cough severity visual analog scale (VAS) records patients’ assessment of cough severity on a 100-mm linear scale ranging from “no cough” (0 mm) to “worst cough” (100 mm). Although cough severity scales are widely used in clinical practice and research, their use in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough has not been formally validated. METHODS: This analysis includes data from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial of the P2X3-receptor antagonist gefapixant for treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough (NCT02612610). Cough severity VAS scores were assessed at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The cough severity VAS was validated using several outcomes, including the Cough Severity Diary (CSD), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale, and objective cough frequency. Validation metrics included test–retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity, responsiveness, and score interpretation (i.e., clinically meaningful change threshold). RESULTS: The analysis included 253 patients (median age, 61.0 years; females, 76%). Test–retest reliability of the cough severity VAS was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.51). The cough severity VAS had acceptable convergent validity with other related measures (Pearson r of 0.53 and -0.41 for CSD and LCQ total scores, respectively; p < 0.0001 for each). Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences in mean cough severity VAS scores across severity groups defined using CSD, LCQ, and cough frequency tertiles. A large effect size was observed in patients with the greatest improvements in PGIC (Cohen d = -1.8). A ⩾ 30-mm reduction in the cough severity VAS was estimated as a clinically meaningful change threshold for clinical trials in chronic cough. CONCLUSIONS: The cough severity VAS is a valid and responsive measure. A cough severity VAS reduction of ⩾ 30 mm can discriminate clinically meaningful changes in chronic cough severity in clinical studies. SAGE Publications 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8552382/ /pubmed/34697975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17534666211049743 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Martin Nguyen, Allison
Bacci, Elizabeth D.
Vernon, Margaret
Birring, Surinder S.
Rosa, Carmen La
Muccino, David
Schelfhout, Jonathan
Validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough
title Validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough
title_full Validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough
title_fullStr Validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough
title_short Validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough
title_sort validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17534666211049743
work_keys_str_mv AT martinnguyenallison validationofavisualanalogscaleforassessingcoughseverityinpatientswithchroniccough
AT baccielizabethd validationofavisualanalogscaleforassessingcoughseverityinpatientswithchroniccough
AT vernonmargaret validationofavisualanalogscaleforassessingcoughseverityinpatientswithchroniccough
AT birringsurinders validationofavisualanalogscaleforassessingcoughseverityinpatientswithchroniccough
AT rosacarmenla validationofavisualanalogscaleforassessingcoughseverityinpatientswithchroniccough
AT muccinodavid validationofavisualanalogscaleforassessingcoughseverityinpatientswithchroniccough
AT schelfhoutjonathan validationofavisualanalogscaleforassessingcoughseverityinpatientswithchroniccough