Cargando…

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy combining aspirin with a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor is a therapeutic mainstay for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the optimal choice of P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor in elderly (aged ≥65 years) patients remains contro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xiangkai, Zhang, Jian, Guo, Jialin, Wang, Jinxin, Pan, Yuhui, Zhao, Xue, Sang, Wentao, Yang, Kehui, Xu, Fengyang, Xu, Feng, Chen, Yuguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721032
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.743259
_version_ 1784591370855383040
author Zhao, Xiangkai
Zhang, Jian
Guo, Jialin
Wang, Jinxin
Pan, Yuhui
Zhao, Xue
Sang, Wentao
Yang, Kehui
Xu, Fengyang
Xu, Feng
Chen, Yuguo
author_facet Zhao, Xiangkai
Zhang, Jian
Guo, Jialin
Wang, Jinxin
Pan, Yuhui
Zhao, Xue
Sang, Wentao
Yang, Kehui
Xu, Fengyang
Xu, Feng
Chen, Yuguo
author_sort Zhao, Xiangkai
collection PubMed
description Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy combining aspirin with a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor is a therapeutic mainstay for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the optimal choice of P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor in elderly (aged ≥65 years) patients remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients with ACS. Methods: We comprehensively searched in Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases through 29(th) March, 2021 for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor or clopidogrel plus aspirin in elderly patients with ACS. Four studies were included in the final analysis. A fixed effects model or random effects model was applied to analyze risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) across studies, and I(2) to assess heterogeneity. Results: A total number of 4429 elderly patients with ACS were included in this analysis, of whom 2170 (49.0%) patients received aspirin plus ticagrelor and 2259 (51.0%) received aspirin plus clopidogrel. The ticagrelor group showed a significant advantage over the clopidogrel group concerning all-cause mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63–0.96, I(2) = 0%; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.95, I(2) = 0%) and cardiovascular death (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.91, I(2) = 0%; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.94, I(2) = 5%) but owned a higher risk of PLATO major or minor bleeding (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.13–1.89, I(2) = 0%; RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.11–1.76, I(2) = 0%). Both the groups showed no significant difference regarding major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.68–1.65, I(2) = 77%; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69–1.58, I(2) = 77%). Conclusion: For elderly ACS patients, aspirin plus ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality but increases the risk of bleeding. Herein, aspirin plus ticagrelor may extend lifetime for elderly ACS patients compared with aspirin plus clopidogrel. The optimal DAPT for elderly ACS patients may be a valuable direction for future research studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8552409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85524092021-10-29 Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhao, Xiangkai Zhang, Jian Guo, Jialin Wang, Jinxin Pan, Yuhui Zhao, Xue Sang, Wentao Yang, Kehui Xu, Fengyang Xu, Feng Chen, Yuguo Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy combining aspirin with a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor is a therapeutic mainstay for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the optimal choice of P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor in elderly (aged ≥65 years) patients remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients with ACS. Methods: We comprehensively searched in Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases through 29(th) March, 2021 for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor or clopidogrel plus aspirin in elderly patients with ACS. Four studies were included in the final analysis. A fixed effects model or random effects model was applied to analyze risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) across studies, and I(2) to assess heterogeneity. Results: A total number of 4429 elderly patients with ACS were included in this analysis, of whom 2170 (49.0%) patients received aspirin plus ticagrelor and 2259 (51.0%) received aspirin plus clopidogrel. The ticagrelor group showed a significant advantage over the clopidogrel group concerning all-cause mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63–0.96, I(2) = 0%; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.95, I(2) = 0%) and cardiovascular death (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.91, I(2) = 0%; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.94, I(2) = 5%) but owned a higher risk of PLATO major or minor bleeding (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.13–1.89, I(2) = 0%; RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.11–1.76, I(2) = 0%). Both the groups showed no significant difference regarding major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.68–1.65, I(2) = 77%; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69–1.58, I(2) = 77%). Conclusion: For elderly ACS patients, aspirin plus ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality but increases the risk of bleeding. Herein, aspirin plus ticagrelor may extend lifetime for elderly ACS patients compared with aspirin plus clopidogrel. The optimal DAPT for elderly ACS patients may be a valuable direction for future research studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8552409/ /pubmed/34721032 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.743259 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhao, Zhang, Guo, Wang, Pan, Zhao, Sang, Yang, Xu, Xu and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Zhao, Xiangkai
Zhang, Jian
Guo, Jialin
Wang, Jinxin
Pan, Yuhui
Zhao, Xue
Sang, Wentao
Yang, Kehui
Xu, Fengyang
Xu, Feng
Chen, Yuguo
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of safety and efficacy between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721032
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.743259
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxiangkai comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjian comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guojialin comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangjinxin comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT panyuhui comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoxue comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sangwentao comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangkehui comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xufengyang comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xufeng comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyuguo comparisonofsafetyandefficacybetweenclopidogrelandticagrelorinelderlypatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis