Cargando…

Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates Not Identified by a Rapid Microarray Diagnostic System

The use of molecular-based diagnostic testing, such as the Luminex Verigene system, to rapidly identify the most common bacterial isolates from blood cultures is an important tool that reduces the duration of inappropriate antibiotics and decreases mortality. However, 5 to 15% of microorganisms reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freiberg, Jeffrey A., Deri, Connor R., Nesbitt, Whitney J., Humphries, Romney M., Nelson, George E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00175-21
_version_ 1784591447308107776
author Freiberg, Jeffrey A.
Deri, Connor R.
Nesbitt, Whitney J.
Humphries, Romney M.
Nelson, George E.
author_facet Freiberg, Jeffrey A.
Deri, Connor R.
Nesbitt, Whitney J.
Humphries, Romney M.
Nelson, George E.
author_sort Freiberg, Jeffrey A.
collection PubMed
description The use of molecular-based diagnostic testing, such as the Luminex Verigene system, to rapidly identify the most common bacterial isolates from blood cultures is an important tool that reduces the duration of inappropriate antibiotics and decreases mortality. However, 5 to 15% of microorganisms recovered from blood culture are unable to be identified by the Verigene Gram-negative (BC-GN) or Gram-positive (BC-GP) assays. In this retrospective, observational study, we evaluate the identities and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of 229 isolates that were not identified by either the Verigene BC-GN or BC-GP assay. The results presented here suggest that important, clinically relevant information about antimicrobial susceptibility patterns can still be inferred even when isolates are not identified by Verigene. We also examined changes in antibiotic use for patients with “unidentified” Verigene results at our institution and found that this subgroup represents an opportunity to optimize empirical antibiotic therapy. IMPORTANCE Rapid diagnostic testing to identify bloodstream pathogens has arisen as an important tool both to ensure adequate antimicrobial therapy is given early and to aid in antimicrobial stewardship by allowing for more rapid deescalation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the significance of isolates that are not able to be identified by rapid diagnostic testing. In this study, we report the identification to the species level and antimicrobial susceptibilities among isolates that were not identified by one such rapid diagnostic platform, the Verigene system. This study provides important insight into how a strong understanding of the strengths and limitations of a given rapid diagnostic platform, coupled with insight into local antibiotic susceptibility patterns, can allow for more nuanced and thoughtful empirical antibiotic selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8552754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85527542021-11-08 Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates Not Identified by a Rapid Microarray Diagnostic System Freiberg, Jeffrey A. Deri, Connor R. Nesbitt, Whitney J. Humphries, Romney M. Nelson, George E. Microbiol Spectr Research Article The use of molecular-based diagnostic testing, such as the Luminex Verigene system, to rapidly identify the most common bacterial isolates from blood cultures is an important tool that reduces the duration of inappropriate antibiotics and decreases mortality. However, 5 to 15% of microorganisms recovered from blood culture are unable to be identified by the Verigene Gram-negative (BC-GN) or Gram-positive (BC-GP) assays. In this retrospective, observational study, we evaluate the identities and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of 229 isolates that were not identified by either the Verigene BC-GN or BC-GP assay. The results presented here suggest that important, clinically relevant information about antimicrobial susceptibility patterns can still be inferred even when isolates are not identified by Verigene. We also examined changes in antibiotic use for patients with “unidentified” Verigene results at our institution and found that this subgroup represents an opportunity to optimize empirical antibiotic therapy. IMPORTANCE Rapid diagnostic testing to identify bloodstream pathogens has arisen as an important tool both to ensure adequate antimicrobial therapy is given early and to aid in antimicrobial stewardship by allowing for more rapid deescalation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the significance of isolates that are not able to be identified by rapid diagnostic testing. In this study, we report the identification to the species level and antimicrobial susceptibilities among isolates that were not identified by one such rapid diagnostic platform, the Verigene system. This study provides important insight into how a strong understanding of the strengths and limitations of a given rapid diagnostic platform, coupled with insight into local antibiotic susceptibility patterns, can allow for more nuanced and thoughtful empirical antibiotic selection. American Society for Microbiology 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8552754/ /pubmed/34190590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00175-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Freiberg et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Freiberg, Jeffrey A.
Deri, Connor R.
Nesbitt, Whitney J.
Humphries, Romney M.
Nelson, George E.
Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates Not Identified by a Rapid Microarray Diagnostic System
title Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates Not Identified by a Rapid Microarray Diagnostic System
title_full Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates Not Identified by a Rapid Microarray Diagnostic System
title_fullStr Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates Not Identified by a Rapid Microarray Diagnostic System
title_full_unstemmed Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates Not Identified by a Rapid Microarray Diagnostic System
title_short Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates Not Identified by a Rapid Microarray Diagnostic System
title_sort identification and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of clinical blood culture isolates not identified by a rapid microarray diagnostic system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00175-21
work_keys_str_mv AT freibergjeffreya identificationandantibioticsusceptibilitypatternsofclinicalbloodcultureisolatesnotidentifiedbyarapidmicroarraydiagnosticsystem
AT dericonnorr identificationandantibioticsusceptibilitypatternsofclinicalbloodcultureisolatesnotidentifiedbyarapidmicroarraydiagnosticsystem
AT nesbittwhitneyj identificationandantibioticsusceptibilitypatternsofclinicalbloodcultureisolatesnotidentifiedbyarapidmicroarraydiagnosticsystem
AT humphriesromneym identificationandantibioticsusceptibilitypatternsofclinicalbloodcultureisolatesnotidentifiedbyarapidmicroarraydiagnosticsystem
AT nelsongeorgee identificationandantibioticsusceptibilitypatternsofclinicalbloodcultureisolatesnotidentifiedbyarapidmicroarraydiagnosticsystem