Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay (Abbott; Chicago, IL, USA) in the detection of COVID-19 infection compared to the reference standard of PCR testing. METHODS: We evaluated the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okoye, Ginette A., Kamara, Haja I., Strobeck, Michelle, Mellman, Thomas Alan, Kwagyan, John, Sullivan, Ava, Byrd, Angel S., Shokrani, Babak, Mighty, Hugh E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35121489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105023
_version_ 1784591457670135808
author Okoye, Ginette A.
Kamara, Haja I.
Strobeck, Michelle
Mellman, Thomas Alan
Kwagyan, John
Sullivan, Ava
Byrd, Angel S.
Shokrani, Babak
Mighty, Hugh E.
author_facet Okoye, Ginette A.
Kamara, Haja I.
Strobeck, Michelle
Mellman, Thomas Alan
Kwagyan, John
Sullivan, Ava
Byrd, Angel S.
Shokrani, Babak
Mighty, Hugh E.
author_sort Okoye, Ginette A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay (Abbott; Chicago, IL, USA) in the detection of COVID-19 infection compared to the reference standard of PCR testing. METHODS: We evaluated the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay relative to a standard reference PCR test. We tested 3810 nasal swabs from symptomatic and asymptomatic adults undergoing surveillance COVID-19 testing at Howard University using one swab for each nostril. One swab was tested using the rapid antigen assay and the other using the PCR test. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay was 91.84% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.40–97.73%) and the specificity was 99.95% (95% CI: 99.81–99.99%). The range of Ct values for the N gene was 10.74–34.90 (M = 26.88, SD=4.86). Fourteen (28.6%) samples had an N gene Ct value > 30. The average N gene Ct value for rapid test negative (i.e. false negative) samples was 31.92. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the test in our symptomatic and asymptomatic cohort was lower than the manufacturer's reported sensitivity in a symptomatic cohort (97.1%). Despite their relatively lower sensitivity (especially in asymptomatic individuals), rapid tests have undeniable benefits (i.e., ease of use and rapid results) that make them a helpful tool in the control of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Given the diagnostic accuracy of these tests as evidenced by this study, rapid tests can be thoughtfully employed in situations where swift results are critical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8552805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85528052021-10-29 Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19 Okoye, Ginette A. Kamara, Haja I. Strobeck, Michelle Mellman, Thomas Alan Kwagyan, John Sullivan, Ava Byrd, Angel S. Shokrani, Babak Mighty, Hugh E. J Clin Virol Article OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay (Abbott; Chicago, IL, USA) in the detection of COVID-19 infection compared to the reference standard of PCR testing. METHODS: We evaluated the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay relative to a standard reference PCR test. We tested 3810 nasal swabs from symptomatic and asymptomatic adults undergoing surveillance COVID-19 testing at Howard University using one swab for each nostril. One swab was tested using the rapid antigen assay and the other using the PCR test. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay was 91.84% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.40–97.73%) and the specificity was 99.95% (95% CI: 99.81–99.99%). The range of Ct values for the N gene was 10.74–34.90 (M = 26.88, SD=4.86). Fourteen (28.6%) samples had an N gene Ct value > 30. The average N gene Ct value for rapid test negative (i.e. false negative) samples was 31.92. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the test in our symptomatic and asymptomatic cohort was lower than the manufacturer's reported sensitivity in a symptomatic cohort (97.1%). Despite their relatively lower sensitivity (especially in asymptomatic individuals), rapid tests have undeniable benefits (i.e., ease of use and rapid results) that make them a helpful tool in the control of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Given the diagnostic accuracy of these tests as evidenced by this study, rapid tests can be thoughtfully employed in situations where swift results are critical. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-02 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8552805/ /pubmed/35121489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105023 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Okoye, Ginette A.
Kamara, Haja I.
Strobeck, Michelle
Mellman, Thomas Alan
Kwagyan, John
Sullivan, Ava
Byrd, Angel S.
Shokrani, Babak
Mighty, Hugh E.
Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19
title Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35121489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105023
work_keys_str_mv AT okoyeginettea diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19
AT kamarahajai diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19
AT strobeckmichelle diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19
AT mellmanthomasalan diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19
AT kwagyanjohn diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19
AT sullivanava diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19
AT byrdangels diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19
AT shokranibabak diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19
AT mightyhughe diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19