Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19
OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay (Abbott; Chicago, IL, USA) in the detection of COVID-19 infection compared to the reference standard of PCR testing. METHODS: We evaluated the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35121489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105023 |
_version_ | 1784591457670135808 |
---|---|
author | Okoye, Ginette A. Kamara, Haja I. Strobeck, Michelle Mellman, Thomas Alan Kwagyan, John Sullivan, Ava Byrd, Angel S. Shokrani, Babak Mighty, Hugh E. |
author_facet | Okoye, Ginette A. Kamara, Haja I. Strobeck, Michelle Mellman, Thomas Alan Kwagyan, John Sullivan, Ava Byrd, Angel S. Shokrani, Babak Mighty, Hugh E. |
author_sort | Okoye, Ginette A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay (Abbott; Chicago, IL, USA) in the detection of COVID-19 infection compared to the reference standard of PCR testing. METHODS: We evaluated the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay relative to a standard reference PCR test. We tested 3810 nasal swabs from symptomatic and asymptomatic adults undergoing surveillance COVID-19 testing at Howard University using one swab for each nostril. One swab was tested using the rapid antigen assay and the other using the PCR test. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay was 91.84% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.40–97.73%) and the specificity was 99.95% (95% CI: 99.81–99.99%). The range of Ct values for the N gene was 10.74–34.90 (M = 26.88, SD=4.86). Fourteen (28.6%) samples had an N gene Ct value > 30. The average N gene Ct value for rapid test negative (i.e. false negative) samples was 31.92. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the test in our symptomatic and asymptomatic cohort was lower than the manufacturer's reported sensitivity in a symptomatic cohort (97.1%). Despite their relatively lower sensitivity (especially in asymptomatic individuals), rapid tests have undeniable benefits (i.e., ease of use and rapid results) that make them a helpful tool in the control of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Given the diagnostic accuracy of these tests as evidenced by this study, rapid tests can be thoughtfully employed in situations where swift results are critical. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8552805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85528052021-10-29 Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19 Okoye, Ginette A. Kamara, Haja I. Strobeck, Michelle Mellman, Thomas Alan Kwagyan, John Sullivan, Ava Byrd, Angel S. Shokrani, Babak Mighty, Hugh E. J Clin Virol Article OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay (Abbott; Chicago, IL, USA) in the detection of COVID-19 infection compared to the reference standard of PCR testing. METHODS: We evaluated the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay relative to a standard reference PCR test. We tested 3810 nasal swabs from symptomatic and asymptomatic adults undergoing surveillance COVID-19 testing at Howard University using one swab for each nostril. One swab was tested using the rapid antigen assay and the other using the PCR test. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card rapid antigen assay was 91.84% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.40–97.73%) and the specificity was 99.95% (95% CI: 99.81–99.99%). The range of Ct values for the N gene was 10.74–34.90 (M = 26.88, SD=4.86). Fourteen (28.6%) samples had an N gene Ct value > 30. The average N gene Ct value for rapid test negative (i.e. false negative) samples was 31.92. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the test in our symptomatic and asymptomatic cohort was lower than the manufacturer's reported sensitivity in a symptomatic cohort (97.1%). Despite their relatively lower sensitivity (especially in asymptomatic individuals), rapid tests have undeniable benefits (i.e., ease of use and rapid results) that make them a helpful tool in the control of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Given the diagnostic accuracy of these tests as evidenced by this study, rapid tests can be thoughtfully employed in situations where swift results are critical. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-02 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8552805/ /pubmed/35121489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105023 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Okoye, Ginette A. Kamara, Haja I. Strobeck, Michelle Mellman, Thomas Alan Kwagyan, John Sullivan, Ava Byrd, Angel S. Shokrani, Babak Mighty, Hugh E. Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19 |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19 |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19 |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of COVID-19 |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test for the early detection of covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35121489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okoyeginettea diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19 AT kamarahajai diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19 AT strobeckmichelle diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19 AT mellmanthomasalan diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19 AT kwagyanjohn diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19 AT sullivanava diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19 AT byrdangels diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19 AT shokranibabak diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19 AT mightyhughe diagnosticaccuracyofarapiddiagnostictestfortheearlydetectionofcovid19 |