Cargando…
How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals
Despite the calls for change, there is significant consensus that when it comes to evaluating publications, review, promotion, and tenure processes should aim to reward research that is of high "quality," is published in "prestigious" journals, and has an "impact." Neve...
Autores principales: | Morales, Esteban, McKiernan, Erin C., Niles, Meredith T., Schimanski, Lesley, Alperin, Juan Pablo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257340 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations
por: Niles, Meredith T., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
por: McKiernan, Erin C, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure
por: Dawson, Diane (DeDe), et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?
por: Alperin, Juan P, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future
por: Schimanski, Lesley A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)