Cargando…
Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study
OBJECTIVE: The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is based on weight related health complications among individuals with overweight and obesity requiring clinical intervention. We aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of a new screening tool based on the EOSS for activating weight management d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259220 |
_version_ | 1784591507996540928 |
---|---|
author | Atlantis, Evan John, James Rufus Fahey, Paul Patrick Hocking, Samantha Peters, Kath |
author_facet | Atlantis, Evan John, James Rufus Fahey, Paul Patrick Hocking, Samantha Peters, Kath |
author_sort | Atlantis, Evan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is based on weight related health complications among individuals with overweight and obesity requiring clinical intervention. We aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of a new screening tool based on the EOSS for activating weight management discussions in general practice. METHODS: We enrolled five General Practitioners (GPs) and 25 of their patients located nationwide in metropolitan areas of Australia to test the feasibility, acceptability, and accuracy of the new ‘EOSS-2 Risk Tool’, using cross-sectional and qualitative study designs. Diagnostic accuracy of the tool for the presence of EOSS ≥2 criteria was based on clinical information collected prospectively. To assess feasibility and applicability, we explored the views of GP and patient participants by thematic analysis of transcribed verbatim and de-identified data collected by semi-structured telephone interviews. RESULTS: Nineteen (76%) patients were aged ≥45 years, five (20%) were male, and 20 (80%) were classified with obesity. All 25 patients screened positive for EOSS ≥2 criteria by the tool. Interviews with patients continued until data saturation was reached resulting in a total of 23 interviews. Our thematic analysis revealed five themes: GP recognition of obesity as a health priority (GPs expressed strong interest in and understanding of its importance as a health priority); obesity stigma (GPs reported the tool helped them initiate health based and non-judgmental conversations with their patients); patient health literacy (GPs and patients reported increased awareness and understanding of weight related health risks), patient motivation for self-management (GPs and patients reported the tool helped focus on self-management of weight related complications), and applicability and scalability (GPs stated it was easy to use, relevant to a range of their patient groups, and scalable if integrated into existing patient management systems). CONCLUSION: The EOSS-2 Risk Tool is potentially clinically useful for activating weight management discussions in general practice. Further research is required to assess feasibility and applicability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8553075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85530752021-10-29 Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study Atlantis, Evan John, James Rufus Fahey, Paul Patrick Hocking, Samantha Peters, Kath PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is based on weight related health complications among individuals with overweight and obesity requiring clinical intervention. We aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of a new screening tool based on the EOSS for activating weight management discussions in general practice. METHODS: We enrolled five General Practitioners (GPs) and 25 of their patients located nationwide in metropolitan areas of Australia to test the feasibility, acceptability, and accuracy of the new ‘EOSS-2 Risk Tool’, using cross-sectional and qualitative study designs. Diagnostic accuracy of the tool for the presence of EOSS ≥2 criteria was based on clinical information collected prospectively. To assess feasibility and applicability, we explored the views of GP and patient participants by thematic analysis of transcribed verbatim and de-identified data collected by semi-structured telephone interviews. RESULTS: Nineteen (76%) patients were aged ≥45 years, five (20%) were male, and 20 (80%) were classified with obesity. All 25 patients screened positive for EOSS ≥2 criteria by the tool. Interviews with patients continued until data saturation was reached resulting in a total of 23 interviews. Our thematic analysis revealed five themes: GP recognition of obesity as a health priority (GPs expressed strong interest in and understanding of its importance as a health priority); obesity stigma (GPs reported the tool helped them initiate health based and non-judgmental conversations with their patients); patient health literacy (GPs and patients reported increased awareness and understanding of weight related health risks), patient motivation for self-management (GPs and patients reported the tool helped focus on self-management of weight related complications), and applicability and scalability (GPs stated it was easy to use, relevant to a range of their patient groups, and scalable if integrated into existing patient management systems). CONCLUSION: The EOSS-2 Risk Tool is potentially clinically useful for activating weight management discussions in general practice. Further research is required to assess feasibility and applicability. Public Library of Science 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8553075/ /pubmed/34710172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259220 Text en © 2021 Atlantis et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Atlantis, Evan John, James Rufus Fahey, Paul Patrick Hocking, Samantha Peters, Kath Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study |
title | Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study |
title_full | Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study |
title_fullStr | Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study |
title_short | Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study |
title_sort | clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary care (aware): a nationwide mixed methods pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atlantisevan clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy AT johnjamesrufus clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy AT faheypaulpatrick clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy AT hockingsamantha clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy AT peterskath clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy |