Cargando…

Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study

OBJECTIVE: The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is based on weight related health complications among individuals with overweight and obesity requiring clinical intervention. We aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of a new screening tool based on the EOSS for activating weight management d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atlantis, Evan, John, James Rufus, Fahey, Paul Patrick, Hocking, Samantha, Peters, Kath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259220
_version_ 1784591507996540928
author Atlantis, Evan
John, James Rufus
Fahey, Paul Patrick
Hocking, Samantha
Peters, Kath
author_facet Atlantis, Evan
John, James Rufus
Fahey, Paul Patrick
Hocking, Samantha
Peters, Kath
author_sort Atlantis, Evan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is based on weight related health complications among individuals with overweight and obesity requiring clinical intervention. We aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of a new screening tool based on the EOSS for activating weight management discussions in general practice. METHODS: We enrolled five General Practitioners (GPs) and 25 of their patients located nationwide in metropolitan areas of Australia to test the feasibility, acceptability, and accuracy of the new ‘EOSS-2 Risk Tool’, using cross-sectional and qualitative study designs. Diagnostic accuracy of the tool for the presence of EOSS ≥2 criteria was based on clinical information collected prospectively. To assess feasibility and applicability, we explored the views of GP and patient participants by thematic analysis of transcribed verbatim and de-identified data collected by semi-structured telephone interviews. RESULTS: Nineteen (76%) patients were aged ≥45 years, five (20%) were male, and 20 (80%) were classified with obesity. All 25 patients screened positive for EOSS ≥2 criteria by the tool. Interviews with patients continued until data saturation was reached resulting in a total of 23 interviews. Our thematic analysis revealed five themes: GP recognition of obesity as a health priority (GPs expressed strong interest in and understanding of its importance as a health priority); obesity stigma (GPs reported the tool helped them initiate health based and non-judgmental conversations with their patients); patient health literacy (GPs and patients reported increased awareness and understanding of weight related health risks), patient motivation for self-management (GPs and patients reported the tool helped focus on self-management of weight related complications), and applicability and scalability (GPs stated it was easy to use, relevant to a range of their patient groups, and scalable if integrated into existing patient management systems). CONCLUSION: The EOSS-2 Risk Tool is potentially clinically useful for activating weight management discussions in general practice. Further research is required to assess feasibility and applicability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8553075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85530752021-10-29 Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study Atlantis, Evan John, James Rufus Fahey, Paul Patrick Hocking, Samantha Peters, Kath PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is based on weight related health complications among individuals with overweight and obesity requiring clinical intervention. We aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of a new screening tool based on the EOSS for activating weight management discussions in general practice. METHODS: We enrolled five General Practitioners (GPs) and 25 of their patients located nationwide in metropolitan areas of Australia to test the feasibility, acceptability, and accuracy of the new ‘EOSS-2 Risk Tool’, using cross-sectional and qualitative study designs. Diagnostic accuracy of the tool for the presence of EOSS ≥2 criteria was based on clinical information collected prospectively. To assess feasibility and applicability, we explored the views of GP and patient participants by thematic analysis of transcribed verbatim and de-identified data collected by semi-structured telephone interviews. RESULTS: Nineteen (76%) patients were aged ≥45 years, five (20%) were male, and 20 (80%) were classified with obesity. All 25 patients screened positive for EOSS ≥2 criteria by the tool. Interviews with patients continued until data saturation was reached resulting in a total of 23 interviews. Our thematic analysis revealed five themes: GP recognition of obesity as a health priority (GPs expressed strong interest in and understanding of its importance as a health priority); obesity stigma (GPs reported the tool helped them initiate health based and non-judgmental conversations with their patients); patient health literacy (GPs and patients reported increased awareness and understanding of weight related health risks), patient motivation for self-management (GPs and patients reported the tool helped focus on self-management of weight related complications), and applicability and scalability (GPs stated it was easy to use, relevant to a range of their patient groups, and scalable if integrated into existing patient management systems). CONCLUSION: The EOSS-2 Risk Tool is potentially clinically useful for activating weight management discussions in general practice. Further research is required to assess feasibility and applicability. Public Library of Science 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8553075/ /pubmed/34710172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259220 Text en © 2021 Atlantis et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Atlantis, Evan
John, James Rufus
Fahey, Paul Patrick
Hocking, Samantha
Peters, Kath
Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study
title Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study
title_full Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study
title_fullStr Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study
title_short Clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary cARE (AWARE): A nationwide mixed methods pilot study
title_sort clinical usefulness of brief screening tool for activating weight management discussions in primary care (aware): a nationwide mixed methods pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259220
work_keys_str_mv AT atlantisevan clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy
AT johnjamesrufus clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy
AT faheypaulpatrick clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy
AT hockingsamantha clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy
AT peterskath clinicalusefulnessofbriefscreeningtoolforactivatingweightmanagementdiscussionsinprimarycareawareanationwidemixedmethodspilotstudy