Cargando…

3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study

OBJECTIVES: 3D-printed (3DP) customized temporary cranial protection solutions following decompressive craniectomy (DC) are currently not widely practiced. A pilot trial of a 3DP customized head protection prototype device (HPPD) on 10 subjects was conducted during the subacute rehabilitation phase....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chua, Karen Sui Geok, Krishnan, Rathi Ratha, Yen, Jia Min, Plunkett, Tegan Kate, Soh, Yan Ming, Lim, Chien Joo, Chia, Catherine M., Looi, Jun Cong, Ng, Suan Gek, Rao, Jai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258296
_version_ 1784591529069772800
author Chua, Karen Sui Geok
Krishnan, Rathi Ratha
Yen, Jia Min
Plunkett, Tegan Kate
Soh, Yan Ming
Lim, Chien Joo
Chia, Catherine M.
Looi, Jun Cong
Ng, Suan Gek
Rao, Jai
author_facet Chua, Karen Sui Geok
Krishnan, Rathi Ratha
Yen, Jia Min
Plunkett, Tegan Kate
Soh, Yan Ming
Lim, Chien Joo
Chia, Catherine M.
Looi, Jun Cong
Ng, Suan Gek
Rao, Jai
author_sort Chua, Karen Sui Geok
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: 3D-printed (3DP) customized temporary cranial protection solutions following decompressive craniectomy (DC) are currently not widely practiced. A pilot trial of a 3DP customized head protection prototype device (HPPD) on 10 subjects was conducted during the subacute rehabilitation phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects > 30 days post-DC with stable cranial flaps and healed wounds were enrolled. HPPD were uniquely designed based on individuals’ CT scan, where the base conformed to the surface of the individual’s skin covering the cranial defect, and the lateral surface three-dimensionally mirrored, the contralateral healthy head. Each HPPD was fabricated using the fused deposition modeling method. These HPPD were then fitted on subjects using a progressive wearing schedule and monitored over 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 follow-up (FU) weeks. Outcomes during FU included; reported wearing time/day (hours), subjective pain, discomfort, pruritus, dislodgment, cosmesis ratings; and observed wound changes. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability without pain or wound changes within 30 minutes of HPPD fitting. RESULTS: In all, 10 enrolled subjects received 12 HPPDs [5/10 male, mean (SD) age 46 (14) years, mean (SD) duration post-DC 110 days (76)] and all subjects tolerated 30 minutes of initial HPPD fitting without wound changes. The mean (SD) HPPD mass was 61.2 g (SD 19.88). During 8 weeks of FU, no HPPD-related skin dehiscence was observed, while 20% (2/10) had transient skin imprints, and 80% (8/10) reported self-limiting pressure and pruritis. DISCUSSION: Findings from this exploratory study demonstrated preliminary feasibility and safety for a customized 3DP HPPD for temporary post-DC head protection over 8 weeks of follow-up. Monitoring and regular rest breaks during HPPD wear were important to prevent skin complications. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the potential for wider 3DP technology applications to provide cranial protection for this vulnerable population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8553164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85531642021-10-29 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study Chua, Karen Sui Geok Krishnan, Rathi Ratha Yen, Jia Min Plunkett, Tegan Kate Soh, Yan Ming Lim, Chien Joo Chia, Catherine M. Looi, Jun Cong Ng, Suan Gek Rao, Jai PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: 3D-printed (3DP) customized temporary cranial protection solutions following decompressive craniectomy (DC) are currently not widely practiced. A pilot trial of a 3DP customized head protection prototype device (HPPD) on 10 subjects was conducted during the subacute rehabilitation phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects > 30 days post-DC with stable cranial flaps and healed wounds were enrolled. HPPD were uniquely designed based on individuals’ CT scan, where the base conformed to the surface of the individual’s skin covering the cranial defect, and the lateral surface three-dimensionally mirrored, the contralateral healthy head. Each HPPD was fabricated using the fused deposition modeling method. These HPPD were then fitted on subjects using a progressive wearing schedule and monitored over 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 follow-up (FU) weeks. Outcomes during FU included; reported wearing time/day (hours), subjective pain, discomfort, pruritus, dislodgment, cosmesis ratings; and observed wound changes. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability without pain or wound changes within 30 minutes of HPPD fitting. RESULTS: In all, 10 enrolled subjects received 12 HPPDs [5/10 male, mean (SD) age 46 (14) years, mean (SD) duration post-DC 110 days (76)] and all subjects tolerated 30 minutes of initial HPPD fitting without wound changes. The mean (SD) HPPD mass was 61.2 g (SD 19.88). During 8 weeks of FU, no HPPD-related skin dehiscence was observed, while 20% (2/10) had transient skin imprints, and 80% (8/10) reported self-limiting pressure and pruritis. DISCUSSION: Findings from this exploratory study demonstrated preliminary feasibility and safety for a customized 3DP HPPD for temporary post-DC head protection over 8 weeks of follow-up. Monitoring and regular rest breaks during HPPD wear were important to prevent skin complications. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the potential for wider 3DP technology applications to provide cranial protection for this vulnerable population. Public Library of Science 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8553164/ /pubmed/34710123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258296 Text en © 2021 Chua et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chua, Karen Sui Geok
Krishnan, Rathi Ratha
Yen, Jia Min
Plunkett, Tegan Kate
Soh, Yan Ming
Lim, Chien Joo
Chia, Catherine M.
Looi, Jun Cong
Ng, Suan Gek
Rao, Jai
3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study
title 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study
title_full 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study
title_fullStr 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study
title_full_unstemmed 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study
title_short 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study
title_sort 3d-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: a pilot feasibility cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258296
work_keys_str_mv AT chuakarensuigeok 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy
AT krishnanrathiratha 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy
AT yenjiamin 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy
AT plunketttegankate 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy
AT sohyanming 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy
AT limchienjoo 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy
AT chiacatherinem 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy
AT looijuncong 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy
AT ngsuangek 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy
AT raojai 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy