Cargando…
3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study
OBJECTIVES: 3D-printed (3DP) customized temporary cranial protection solutions following decompressive craniectomy (DC) are currently not widely practiced. A pilot trial of a 3DP customized head protection prototype device (HPPD) on 10 subjects was conducted during the subacute rehabilitation phase....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258296 |
_version_ | 1784591529069772800 |
---|---|
author | Chua, Karen Sui Geok Krishnan, Rathi Ratha Yen, Jia Min Plunkett, Tegan Kate Soh, Yan Ming Lim, Chien Joo Chia, Catherine M. Looi, Jun Cong Ng, Suan Gek Rao, Jai |
author_facet | Chua, Karen Sui Geok Krishnan, Rathi Ratha Yen, Jia Min Plunkett, Tegan Kate Soh, Yan Ming Lim, Chien Joo Chia, Catherine M. Looi, Jun Cong Ng, Suan Gek Rao, Jai |
author_sort | Chua, Karen Sui Geok |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: 3D-printed (3DP) customized temporary cranial protection solutions following decompressive craniectomy (DC) are currently not widely practiced. A pilot trial of a 3DP customized head protection prototype device (HPPD) on 10 subjects was conducted during the subacute rehabilitation phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects > 30 days post-DC with stable cranial flaps and healed wounds were enrolled. HPPD were uniquely designed based on individuals’ CT scan, where the base conformed to the surface of the individual’s skin covering the cranial defect, and the lateral surface three-dimensionally mirrored, the contralateral healthy head. Each HPPD was fabricated using the fused deposition modeling method. These HPPD were then fitted on subjects using a progressive wearing schedule and monitored over 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 follow-up (FU) weeks. Outcomes during FU included; reported wearing time/day (hours), subjective pain, discomfort, pruritus, dislodgment, cosmesis ratings; and observed wound changes. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability without pain or wound changes within 30 minutes of HPPD fitting. RESULTS: In all, 10 enrolled subjects received 12 HPPDs [5/10 male, mean (SD) age 46 (14) years, mean (SD) duration post-DC 110 days (76)] and all subjects tolerated 30 minutes of initial HPPD fitting without wound changes. The mean (SD) HPPD mass was 61.2 g (SD 19.88). During 8 weeks of FU, no HPPD-related skin dehiscence was observed, while 20% (2/10) had transient skin imprints, and 80% (8/10) reported self-limiting pressure and pruritis. DISCUSSION: Findings from this exploratory study demonstrated preliminary feasibility and safety for a customized 3DP HPPD for temporary post-DC head protection over 8 weeks of follow-up. Monitoring and regular rest breaks during HPPD wear were important to prevent skin complications. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the potential for wider 3DP technology applications to provide cranial protection for this vulnerable population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8553164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85531642021-10-29 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study Chua, Karen Sui Geok Krishnan, Rathi Ratha Yen, Jia Min Plunkett, Tegan Kate Soh, Yan Ming Lim, Chien Joo Chia, Catherine M. Looi, Jun Cong Ng, Suan Gek Rao, Jai PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: 3D-printed (3DP) customized temporary cranial protection solutions following decompressive craniectomy (DC) are currently not widely practiced. A pilot trial of a 3DP customized head protection prototype device (HPPD) on 10 subjects was conducted during the subacute rehabilitation phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects > 30 days post-DC with stable cranial flaps and healed wounds were enrolled. HPPD were uniquely designed based on individuals’ CT scan, where the base conformed to the surface of the individual’s skin covering the cranial defect, and the lateral surface three-dimensionally mirrored, the contralateral healthy head. Each HPPD was fabricated using the fused deposition modeling method. These HPPD were then fitted on subjects using a progressive wearing schedule and monitored over 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 follow-up (FU) weeks. Outcomes during FU included; reported wearing time/day (hours), subjective pain, discomfort, pruritus, dislodgment, cosmesis ratings; and observed wound changes. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability without pain or wound changes within 30 minutes of HPPD fitting. RESULTS: In all, 10 enrolled subjects received 12 HPPDs [5/10 male, mean (SD) age 46 (14) years, mean (SD) duration post-DC 110 days (76)] and all subjects tolerated 30 minutes of initial HPPD fitting without wound changes. The mean (SD) HPPD mass was 61.2 g (SD 19.88). During 8 weeks of FU, no HPPD-related skin dehiscence was observed, while 20% (2/10) had transient skin imprints, and 80% (8/10) reported self-limiting pressure and pruritis. DISCUSSION: Findings from this exploratory study demonstrated preliminary feasibility and safety for a customized 3DP HPPD for temporary post-DC head protection over 8 weeks of follow-up. Monitoring and regular rest breaks during HPPD wear were important to prevent skin complications. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the potential for wider 3DP technology applications to provide cranial protection for this vulnerable population. Public Library of Science 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8553164/ /pubmed/34710123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258296 Text en © 2021 Chua et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chua, Karen Sui Geok Krishnan, Rathi Ratha Yen, Jia Min Plunkett, Tegan Kate Soh, Yan Ming Lim, Chien Joo Chia, Catherine M. Looi, Jun Cong Ng, Suan Gek Rao, Jai 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study |
title | 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study |
title_full | 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study |
title_fullStr | 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study |
title_short | 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study |
title_sort | 3d-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: a pilot feasibility cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chuakarensuigeok 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy AT krishnanrathiratha 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy AT yenjiamin 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy AT plunketttegankate 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy AT sohyanming 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy AT limchienjoo 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy AT chiacatherinem 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy AT looijuncong 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy AT ngsuangek 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy AT raojai 3dprintedexternalcranialprotectionfollowingdecompressivecraniectomyafterbraininjuryapilotfeasibilitycohortstudy |