Cargando…
Poor awareness of stroke educational tools among older adults in China
BACKGROUND: Stroke 1‐2‐0 and FAST (Face, Arm, Speech, Time) are two popular stroke educational tools that have been used in many stroke promotion campaigns. However, few researchers have investigated awareness of these tools among older adults in communities. METHODS: This study was a cross‐sectiona...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34520639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2357 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Stroke 1‐2‐0 and FAST (Face, Arm, Speech, Time) are two popular stroke educational tools that have been used in many stroke promotion campaigns. However, few researchers have investigated awareness of these tools among older adults in communities. METHODS: This study was a cross‐sectional survey of community‐living older adults. Two family physicians conducted face‐to‐face interviews with older adults living in Minhang district, Shanghai, between October 1, 2020 and November 31, 2020. The survey comprised three parts: basic information, prior medical history, and stroke awareness knowledge. We focused on the awareness of FAST and Stroke 1‐2‐0 and investigated factors associated with awareness of these stroke educational tools. RESULTS: The sample of this study was 466 older adults. Their mean age was 73.45 years. Male respondents accounted for 46.14% of the total sample. More than half of the older adults surveyed had an educational background of less than 6 years. Over 90% of the older adults surveyed had never heard about Stroke 1‐2‐0 or FAST. The awareness rate of Stroke 1‐2‐0 and FAST was 7.94%, with awareness of Stroke 1‐2‐0 being higher than that of FAST (6.01% vs. 0.43%, p < .05). None of the respondents who had heard about the two stroke educational tools could explain the utility of either tool fully. Having a background in higher education was associated with awareness of stroke educational tools independently, with an odds ratio (OR) of 10.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.7–27.4, p < .001. In addition, Wechat (OR 6.57, 95%CI 2.65–16.27, p < .001) and the community bulletin board (OR 2.95, 95%CI 1.37–6.33, p = .005) were found to be important sources for acquiring knowledge of stroke awareness tools. CONCLUSION: The limited awareness of Stroke 1‐2‐0 and FAST displayed among older adults in the community indicates that we must take action to improve education on stroke among the elderly. |
---|