Cargando…
Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study tested the performance of a pooled testing strategy for RT-PCR and its cost-effectiveness. In total, 1280 leftover respiratory samples coll...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.038 |
_version_ | 1784591565999570944 |
---|---|
author | Bogere, Naghib Bongomin, Felix Katende, Andrew Ssebambulidde, Kenneth Ssengooba, Willy Ssenfuka, Henry Kigozi, Edgar Biraro, Samuel Kateete, David P. Andia-Biraro, Irene |
author_facet | Bogere, Naghib Bongomin, Felix Katende, Andrew Ssebambulidde, Kenneth Ssengooba, Willy Ssenfuka, Henry Kigozi, Edgar Biraro, Samuel Kateete, David P. Andia-Biraro, Irene |
author_sort | Bogere, Naghib |
collection | PubMed |
description | Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study tested the performance of a pooled testing strategy for RT-PCR and its cost-effectiveness. In total, 1280 leftover respiratory samples collected between 19 April and 6 May 2021 were tested in 128 pools of 10 samples each, out of which 16 pools were positive. The positivity rate of the unpooled samples was 1.9% (24/1280). After parallel testing using the individual and pooled testing strategies, positive agreement was 100% and negative agreement was 99.8%. The overall median cycle threshold (Ct) value of the unpooled samples was 29.8 (interquartile range 22.3–34.3). Pools that remained positive when compared with the results of individual samples had lower median Ct values compared with those that turned out to be negative (28.8 versus 34.8; P=0.0.035). Pooled testing reduced the cost >4-fold. Pooled testing may be a more cost-effective approach to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings without compromising diagnostic performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8553367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85533672021-10-29 Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda Bogere, Naghib Bongomin, Felix Katende, Andrew Ssebambulidde, Kenneth Ssengooba, Willy Ssenfuka, Henry Kigozi, Edgar Biraro, Samuel Kateete, David P. Andia-Biraro, Irene Int J Infect Dis Article Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study tested the performance of a pooled testing strategy for RT-PCR and its cost-effectiveness. In total, 1280 leftover respiratory samples collected between 19 April and 6 May 2021 were tested in 128 pools of 10 samples each, out of which 16 pools were positive. The positivity rate of the unpooled samples was 1.9% (24/1280). After parallel testing using the individual and pooled testing strategies, positive agreement was 100% and negative agreement was 99.8%. The overall median cycle threshold (Ct) value of the unpooled samples was 29.8 (interquartile range 22.3–34.3). Pools that remained positive when compared with the results of individual samples had lower median Ct values compared with those that turned out to be negative (28.8 versus 34.8; P=0.0.035). Pooled testing reduced the cost >4-fold. Pooled testing may be a more cost-effective approach to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings without compromising diagnostic performance. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021-12 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8553367/ /pubmed/34757007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.038 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Bogere, Naghib Bongomin, Felix Katende, Andrew Ssebambulidde, Kenneth Ssengooba, Willy Ssenfuka, Henry Kigozi, Edgar Biraro, Samuel Kateete, David P. Andia-Biraro, Irene Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda |
title | Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda |
title_full | Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda |
title_fullStr | Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda |
title_short | Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda |
title_sort | performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for sars-cov-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in uganda |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bogerenaghib performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda AT bongominfelix performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda AT katendeandrew performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda AT ssebambuliddekenneth performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda AT ssengoobawilly performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda AT ssenfukahenry performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda AT kigoziedgar performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda AT birarosamuel performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda AT kateetedavidp performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda AT andiabiraroirene performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda |