Cargando…

Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study tested the performance of a pooled testing strategy for RT-PCR and its cost-effectiveness. In total, 1280 leftover respiratory samples coll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogere, Naghib, Bongomin, Felix, Katende, Andrew, Ssebambulidde, Kenneth, Ssengooba, Willy, Ssenfuka, Henry, Kigozi, Edgar, Biraro, Samuel, Kateete, David P., Andia-Biraro, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.038
_version_ 1784591565999570944
author Bogere, Naghib
Bongomin, Felix
Katende, Andrew
Ssebambulidde, Kenneth
Ssengooba, Willy
Ssenfuka, Henry
Kigozi, Edgar
Biraro, Samuel
Kateete, David P.
Andia-Biraro, Irene
author_facet Bogere, Naghib
Bongomin, Felix
Katende, Andrew
Ssebambulidde, Kenneth
Ssengooba, Willy
Ssenfuka, Henry
Kigozi, Edgar
Biraro, Samuel
Kateete, David P.
Andia-Biraro, Irene
author_sort Bogere, Naghib
collection PubMed
description Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study tested the performance of a pooled testing strategy for RT-PCR and its cost-effectiveness. In total, 1280 leftover respiratory samples collected between 19 April and 6 May 2021 were tested in 128 pools of 10 samples each, out of which 16 pools were positive. The positivity rate of the unpooled samples was 1.9% (24/1280). After parallel testing using the individual and pooled testing strategies, positive agreement was 100% and negative agreement was 99.8%. The overall median cycle threshold (Ct) value of the unpooled samples was 29.8 (interquartile range 22.3–34.3). Pools that remained positive when compared with the results of individual samples had lower median Ct values compared with those that turned out to be negative (28.8 versus 34.8; P=0.0.035). Pooled testing reduced the cost >4-fold. Pooled testing may be a more cost-effective approach to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings without compromising diagnostic performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8553367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85533672021-10-29 Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda Bogere, Naghib Bongomin, Felix Katende, Andrew Ssebambulidde, Kenneth Ssengooba, Willy Ssenfuka, Henry Kigozi, Edgar Biraro, Samuel Kateete, David P. Andia-Biraro, Irene Int J Infect Dis Article Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study tested the performance of a pooled testing strategy for RT-PCR and its cost-effectiveness. In total, 1280 leftover respiratory samples collected between 19 April and 6 May 2021 were tested in 128 pools of 10 samples each, out of which 16 pools were positive. The positivity rate of the unpooled samples was 1.9% (24/1280). After parallel testing using the individual and pooled testing strategies, positive agreement was 100% and negative agreement was 99.8%. The overall median cycle threshold (Ct) value of the unpooled samples was 29.8 (interquartile range 22.3–34.3). Pools that remained positive when compared with the results of individual samples had lower median Ct values compared with those that turned out to be negative (28.8 versus 34.8; P=0.0.035). Pooled testing reduced the cost >4-fold. Pooled testing may be a more cost-effective approach to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings without compromising diagnostic performance. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021-12 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8553367/ /pubmed/34757007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.038 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Bogere, Naghib
Bongomin, Felix
Katende, Andrew
Ssebambulidde, Kenneth
Ssengooba, Willy
Ssenfuka, Henry
Kigozi, Edgar
Biraro, Samuel
Kateete, David P.
Andia-Biraro, Irene
Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda
title Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda
title_full Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda
title_fullStr Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda
title_short Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda
title_sort performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for sars-cov-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in uganda
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.038
work_keys_str_mv AT bogerenaghib performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda
AT bongominfelix performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda
AT katendeandrew performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda
AT ssebambuliddekenneth performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda
AT ssengoobawilly performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda
AT ssenfukahenry performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda
AT kigoziedgar performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda
AT birarosamuel performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda
AT kateetedavidp performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda
AT andiabiraroirene performanceandcosteffectivenessofapooledtestingstrategyforsarscov2usingrealtimepolymerasechainreactioninuganda