Cargando…

Postpartum women’s experiences of social and healthcare professional support during the COVID-19 pandemic: A recurrent cross-sectional thematic analysis

PROBLEM: Disrupted access to social and healthcare professional support during the COVID-19 pandemic have had an adverse effect on maternal mental health. BACKGROUND: Motherhood is a key life transition which increases vulnerability to experience negative affect. AIM: Explore UK women’s postnatal ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Leanne, De Pascalis, Leonardo, Harrold, Joanne A., Fallon, Victoria, Silverio, Sergio A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34756734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.10.002
Descripción
Sumario:PROBLEM: Disrupted access to social and healthcare professional support during the COVID-19 pandemic have had an adverse effect on maternal mental health. BACKGROUND: Motherhood is a key life transition which increases vulnerability to experience negative affect. AIM: Explore UK women’s postnatal experiences of social and healthcare professional support during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 women, approximately 30 days after initial social distancing guidelines were imposed (T1), and a separate 12 women were interviewed approximately 30 days after the initial easing of social distancing restrictions (T2). Recurrent cross-sectional thematic analysis was conducted in NVivo 12. FINDINGS: T1 themes were, ‘Motherhood has been an isolating experience’ (exacerbated loneliness due to diminished support accessibility) and ‘Everything is under lock and key’ (confusion, alienation, and anxiety regarding disrupted face-to-face healthcare checks). T2 themes were, ‘Disrupted healthcare professional support’ (feeling burdensome, abandoned, and frustrated by virtual healthcare) and ‘Easing restrictions are bittersweet’ (conflict between enhanced emotional wellbeing, and sadness regarding lost postnatal time). DISCUSSION: Respondents at both timepoints were adversely affected by restricted access to informal (family and friends) and formal (healthcare professional) support, which were not sufficiently bridged virtually. Additionally, the prospect of attending face-to-face appointments was anxiety-provoking and perceived as being contradictory to social distancing guidance. Prohibition of family from maternity wards was also salient and distressing for T2, but not T1 respondents. CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals should encourage maternal help-seeking and provide timely access to mental health services. Improving access to informal and formal face-to-face support are essential in protecting maternal and infant wellbeing.