Cargando…

Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?

PURPOSE: The rates of hysterectomy are falling worldwide, and the surgical approach is undergoing a major change. To avoid abdominal hysterectomy, a minimally invasive approach has been implemented. Due to the increasing rates of subtotal hysterectomy, we are faced with the following questions: how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neis, Felix, Reisenauer, Christl, Kraemer, Bernhard, Wagner, Philipp, Brucker, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06193-6
_version_ 1784591627833049088
author Neis, Felix
Reisenauer, Christl
Kraemer, Bernhard
Wagner, Philipp
Brucker, Sara
author_facet Neis, Felix
Reisenauer, Christl
Kraemer, Bernhard
Wagner, Philipp
Brucker, Sara
author_sort Neis, Felix
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The rates of hysterectomy are falling worldwide, and the surgical approach is undergoing a major change. To avoid abdominal hysterectomy, a minimally invasive approach has been implemented. Due to the increasing rates of subtotal hysterectomy, we are faced with the following questions: how often does the cervical stump have to be removed secondarily, and what are the indications? METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-centre analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump conducted from 2004 to 2018. RESULTS: Secondary resection of the cervical stump was performed in 137 women. Seventy-four percent of the previous subtotal hysterectomy procedures were performed in our hospital, and 26% were performed in an external hospital. During the study period, 5209 subtotal hysterectomy procedures were performed at our hospital. The three main indications for secondary resection of the cervical stump were prolapse (31.4%), spotting (19.0%) and cervical dysplasia (18.2%). Unexpected histological findings (premalignant and malignant) after subtotal hysterectomy resulted in immediate (median time, 1 month) secondary resection of the cervical stump in 11 cases. In four patients, the indication was a secondary malignant gynaecological disease that occurred more than 5 years after subtotal hysterectomy. The median time between subtotal hysterectomy and secondary resection of the cervical stump was 40 months. Secondary resection of the cervical stump was performed vaginally in 75.2% of cases, laparoscopically in 20.4% of cases and abdominally in 4.4% of cases. The overall complication rate was 5%. CONCLUSION: Secondary resection of the cervical stump is a rare surgery with a low complication rate and can be performed via the vaginal or laparoscopic approach in most cases. The most common indications are prolapse, spotting and cervical dysplasia. If a secondary resection of the cervical stump is necessary due to symptoms, 66.6% will be performed within the first 6 years after subtotal hysterectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8553675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85536752021-11-04 Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when? Neis, Felix Reisenauer, Christl Kraemer, Bernhard Wagner, Philipp Brucker, Sara Arch Gynecol Obstet General Gynecology PURPOSE: The rates of hysterectomy are falling worldwide, and the surgical approach is undergoing a major change. To avoid abdominal hysterectomy, a minimally invasive approach has been implemented. Due to the increasing rates of subtotal hysterectomy, we are faced with the following questions: how often does the cervical stump have to be removed secondarily, and what are the indications? METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-centre analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump conducted from 2004 to 2018. RESULTS: Secondary resection of the cervical stump was performed in 137 women. Seventy-four percent of the previous subtotal hysterectomy procedures were performed in our hospital, and 26% were performed in an external hospital. During the study period, 5209 subtotal hysterectomy procedures were performed at our hospital. The three main indications for secondary resection of the cervical stump were prolapse (31.4%), spotting (19.0%) and cervical dysplasia (18.2%). Unexpected histological findings (premalignant and malignant) after subtotal hysterectomy resulted in immediate (median time, 1 month) secondary resection of the cervical stump in 11 cases. In four patients, the indication was a secondary malignant gynaecological disease that occurred more than 5 years after subtotal hysterectomy. The median time between subtotal hysterectomy and secondary resection of the cervical stump was 40 months. Secondary resection of the cervical stump was performed vaginally in 75.2% of cases, laparoscopically in 20.4% of cases and abdominally in 4.4% of cases. The overall complication rate was 5%. CONCLUSION: Secondary resection of the cervical stump is a rare surgery with a low complication rate and can be performed via the vaginal or laparoscopic approach in most cases. The most common indications are prolapse, spotting and cervical dysplasia. If a secondary resection of the cervical stump is necessary due to symptoms, 66.6% will be performed within the first 6 years after subtotal hysterectomy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8553675/ /pubmed/34453213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06193-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General Gynecology
Neis, Felix
Reisenauer, Christl
Kraemer, Bernhard
Wagner, Philipp
Brucker, Sara
Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?
title Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?
title_full Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?
title_fullStr Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?
title_short Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?
title_sort retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?
topic General Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06193-6
work_keys_str_mv AT neisfelix retrospectiveanalysisofsecondaryresectionofthecervicalstumpaftersubtotalhysterectomywhyandwhen
AT reisenauerchristl retrospectiveanalysisofsecondaryresectionofthecervicalstumpaftersubtotalhysterectomywhyandwhen
AT kraemerbernhard retrospectiveanalysisofsecondaryresectionofthecervicalstumpaftersubtotalhysterectomywhyandwhen
AT wagnerphilipp retrospectiveanalysisofsecondaryresectionofthecervicalstumpaftersubtotalhysterectomywhyandwhen
AT bruckersara retrospectiveanalysisofsecondaryresectionofthecervicalstumpaftersubtotalhysterectomywhyandwhen