Cargando…

A unifying view on extended phase graphs and Bloch simulations for quantitative MRI

Quantitative MRI methods and learning-based algorithms require exact forward simulations. One critical factor to correctly describe magnetization dynamics is the effect of slice-selective RF pulses. While contemporary simulation techniques correctly capture their influence, they only provide final m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guenthner, Christian, Amthor, Thomas, Doneva, Mariya, Kozerke, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00233-6
_version_ 1784591654609485824
author Guenthner, Christian
Amthor, Thomas
Doneva, Mariya
Kozerke, Sebastian
author_facet Guenthner, Christian
Amthor, Thomas
Doneva, Mariya
Kozerke, Sebastian
author_sort Guenthner, Christian
collection PubMed
description Quantitative MRI methods and learning-based algorithms require exact forward simulations. One critical factor to correctly describe magnetization dynamics is the effect of slice-selective RF pulses. While contemporary simulation techniques correctly capture their influence, they only provide final magnetization distributions, require to be run for each parameter set separately, and make it hard to derive general theoretical conclusions and to generate a fundamental understanding of echo formation in the presence of slice-profile effects. This work aims to provide a mathematically exact framework, which is equally intuitive as extended phase graphs (EPGs), but also considers slice-profiles through their natural spatial representation. We show, through an analytical, hybrid Bloch-EPG formalism, that the spatially-resolved EPG approach allows to exactly predict the signal dependency on off-resonance, spoiling moment, microscopic dephasing, and echo time. We also demonstrate that our formalism allows to use the same phase graph to simulate both gradient-spoiled and balanced SSFP-based MR sequences. We present a derivation of the formalism and identify the connection to existing methods, i.e. slice-selective Bloch, slice-selective EPG, and the partitioned EPG. As a use case, the proposed hybrid Bloch-EPG framework is applied to MR Fingerprinting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8553818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85538182021-11-01 A unifying view on extended phase graphs and Bloch simulations for quantitative MRI Guenthner, Christian Amthor, Thomas Doneva, Mariya Kozerke, Sebastian Sci Rep Article Quantitative MRI methods and learning-based algorithms require exact forward simulations. One critical factor to correctly describe magnetization dynamics is the effect of slice-selective RF pulses. While contemporary simulation techniques correctly capture their influence, they only provide final magnetization distributions, require to be run for each parameter set separately, and make it hard to derive general theoretical conclusions and to generate a fundamental understanding of echo formation in the presence of slice-profile effects. This work aims to provide a mathematically exact framework, which is equally intuitive as extended phase graphs (EPGs), but also considers slice-profiles through their natural spatial representation. We show, through an analytical, hybrid Bloch-EPG formalism, that the spatially-resolved EPG approach allows to exactly predict the signal dependency on off-resonance, spoiling moment, microscopic dephasing, and echo time. We also demonstrate that our formalism allows to use the same phase graph to simulate both gradient-spoiled and balanced SSFP-based MR sequences. We present a derivation of the formalism and identify the connection to existing methods, i.e. slice-selective Bloch, slice-selective EPG, and the partitioned EPG. As a use case, the proposed hybrid Bloch-EPG framework is applied to MR Fingerprinting. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8553818/ /pubmed/34711847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00233-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Guenthner, Christian
Amthor, Thomas
Doneva, Mariya
Kozerke, Sebastian
A unifying view on extended phase graphs and Bloch simulations for quantitative MRI
title A unifying view on extended phase graphs and Bloch simulations for quantitative MRI
title_full A unifying view on extended phase graphs and Bloch simulations for quantitative MRI
title_fullStr A unifying view on extended phase graphs and Bloch simulations for quantitative MRI
title_full_unstemmed A unifying view on extended phase graphs and Bloch simulations for quantitative MRI
title_short A unifying view on extended phase graphs and Bloch simulations for quantitative MRI
title_sort unifying view on extended phase graphs and bloch simulations for quantitative mri
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00233-6
work_keys_str_mv AT guenthnerchristian aunifyingviewonextendedphasegraphsandblochsimulationsforquantitativemri
AT amthorthomas aunifyingviewonextendedphasegraphsandblochsimulationsforquantitativemri
AT donevamariya aunifyingviewonextendedphasegraphsandblochsimulationsforquantitativemri
AT kozerkesebastian aunifyingviewonextendedphasegraphsandblochsimulationsforquantitativemri
AT guenthnerchristian unifyingviewonextendedphasegraphsandblochsimulationsforquantitativemri
AT amthorthomas unifyingviewonextendedphasegraphsandblochsimulationsforquantitativemri
AT donevamariya unifyingviewonextendedphasegraphsandblochsimulationsforquantitativemri
AT kozerkesebastian unifyingviewonextendedphasegraphsandblochsimulationsforquantitativemri