Cargando…
Protected areas are not effective for the conservation of freshwater insects in Brazil
Biodiversity conservation has faced many challenges, especially the conversion of natural areas that compete with use for agriculture, energy production and mineral extraction. This problem is further aggravated by lack of knowledge of the biodiversity that exists and the geographical distribution o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00700-0 |
_version_ | 1784591662082686976 |
---|---|
author | Dias-Silva, Karina Vieira, Thiago Bernardi Moreira, Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo Juen, Leandro Hamada, Neusa |
author_facet | Dias-Silva, Karina Vieira, Thiago Bernardi Moreira, Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo Juen, Leandro Hamada, Neusa |
author_sort | Dias-Silva, Karina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biodiversity conservation has faced many challenges, especially the conversion of natural areas that compete with use for agriculture, energy production and mineral extraction. This problem is further aggravated by lack of knowledge of the biodiversity that exists and the geographical distribution of different groups. The objectives of our study were to examine the distributional pattern of Gerromorpha diversity in Brazil, create a map of conservation priority areas, estimate the degree of protection that the current network of protected areas guarantees to this insect group, and identify the size thresholds in geographical distributions that would allow species to be protected. We used species occurrences from the Water Bugs Distributional Database, and we used 19 bioclimatic variables to build models of the potential distributions of species using the MaxEnt program. Using the potential model results, we calculated diversity metrics and overlapped them with the current state and federal “conservation units” (protected areas for biodiversity) in Brazil. Total beta diversity and turnover portions were separated into two faunistic groups, one in northern and the other in southern Brazil. The Amazon has higher beta diversity than what was predicted by the null models. We detected a positive relationship between species distribution area and occurrence in conservation units. Conservation units with less than 250 km(2) do not protect Gerromorpha species. Our results reinforce the necessity of formulating new conservation strategies for this group, contemplating species with both restricted and ample distributions, because rare and specialist species are the most harmed by habitat reduction, given that they are more sensitive to environmental disturbance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8553851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85538512021-11-01 Protected areas are not effective for the conservation of freshwater insects in Brazil Dias-Silva, Karina Vieira, Thiago Bernardi Moreira, Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo Juen, Leandro Hamada, Neusa Sci Rep Article Biodiversity conservation has faced many challenges, especially the conversion of natural areas that compete with use for agriculture, energy production and mineral extraction. This problem is further aggravated by lack of knowledge of the biodiversity that exists and the geographical distribution of different groups. The objectives of our study were to examine the distributional pattern of Gerromorpha diversity in Brazil, create a map of conservation priority areas, estimate the degree of protection that the current network of protected areas guarantees to this insect group, and identify the size thresholds in geographical distributions that would allow species to be protected. We used species occurrences from the Water Bugs Distributional Database, and we used 19 bioclimatic variables to build models of the potential distributions of species using the MaxEnt program. Using the potential model results, we calculated diversity metrics and overlapped them with the current state and federal “conservation units” (protected areas for biodiversity) in Brazil. Total beta diversity and turnover portions were separated into two faunistic groups, one in northern and the other in southern Brazil. The Amazon has higher beta diversity than what was predicted by the null models. We detected a positive relationship between species distribution area and occurrence in conservation units. Conservation units with less than 250 km(2) do not protect Gerromorpha species. Our results reinforce the necessity of formulating new conservation strategies for this group, contemplating species with both restricted and ample distributions, because rare and specialist species are the most harmed by habitat reduction, given that they are more sensitive to environmental disturbance. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8553851/ /pubmed/34711886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00700-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Dias-Silva, Karina Vieira, Thiago Bernardi Moreira, Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo Juen, Leandro Hamada, Neusa Protected areas are not effective for the conservation of freshwater insects in Brazil |
title | Protected areas are not effective for the conservation of freshwater insects in Brazil |
title_full | Protected areas are not effective for the conservation of freshwater insects in Brazil |
title_fullStr | Protected areas are not effective for the conservation of freshwater insects in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed | Protected areas are not effective for the conservation of freshwater insects in Brazil |
title_short | Protected areas are not effective for the conservation of freshwater insects in Brazil |
title_sort | protected areas are not effective for the conservation of freshwater insects in brazil |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00700-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diassilvakarina protectedareasarenoteffectivefortheconservationoffreshwaterinsectsinbrazil AT vieirathiagobernardi protectedareasarenoteffectivefortheconservationoffreshwaterinsectsinbrazil AT moreirafelipeferrazfigueiredo protectedareasarenoteffectivefortheconservationoffreshwaterinsectsinbrazil AT juenleandro protectedareasarenoteffectivefortheconservationoffreshwaterinsectsinbrazil AT hamadaneusa protectedareasarenoteffectivefortheconservationoffreshwaterinsectsinbrazil |