Cargando…

A Comparison of Clinical, Electro-Diagnostic, Laboratory, and Treatment Outcome Differences in a Cohort of HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Patients With Myasthenia Gravis

There is limited literature comparing the clinical parameters and treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical differences and treatment outcomes in the two categories of patients, particularly the safe us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moodley, Kaminie, Bill, Pierre L. A., Patel, Vinod B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.738813
_version_ 1784591680985366528
author Moodley, Kaminie
Bill, Pierre L. A.
Patel, Vinod B.
author_facet Moodley, Kaminie
Bill, Pierre L. A.
Patel, Vinod B.
author_sort Moodley, Kaminie
collection PubMed
description There is limited literature comparing the clinical parameters and treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical differences and treatment outcomes in the two categories of patients, particularly the safe use of immunosuppressive therapy in immunocompromised patients. The study was a retrospective analysis of medical records of MG patients from the neuromuscular unit at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital in Kwa-Zulu Natal between 2003 and 2019. One hundred and seventy-eight (178) patients fulfilled the clinical criteria for MG. Twenty-four (13.4%) were HIV-infected and 154 (86.5%) were HIV-uninfected. There were 116 (65%) females, median 45 years, (IQR 40–62), 90 (50.5%) black African, 66 (37%) Indian, 20 (11.2%) white, and 2 (1.1%) of mixed ancestry. In the HIV-infected cohort, 20 (87%) had generalized MG, 12 (50%) bulbar, and 14 (60.9%) respiratory onset MG, 12 (50%) presented with MG Foundation of America (MGFA) class five diseases at diagnosis, six (25%) presented with MG crisis during the 5-year follow-up. Thirteen (54%) of the HIV-infected group required rescue therapy using (plasma exchange or IV immunoglobulin) combined with pulse cyclophosphamide compared with 17 (11%) in the HIV-uninfected cohort, respectively. At 5 years, 8 (33%) of the HIV-infected group remained refractory to treatment compared with 10 (6.5%) HIV-uninfected cohort, respectively. No adverse events were documented in HIV-infected patients receiving combination rescue therapy (PLEX or IVIG combined with IV cyclophosphamide). In conclusion HIV-infected MG patients are more likely to require combination rescue therapy with PE/IVIG and IV cyclophosphamide compared with those who were HIV-uninfected. No side effects were documented in the HIV-infected group receiving the above therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8553930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85539302021-10-30 A Comparison of Clinical, Electro-Diagnostic, Laboratory, and Treatment Outcome Differences in a Cohort of HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Patients With Myasthenia Gravis Moodley, Kaminie Bill, Pierre L. A. Patel, Vinod B. Front Neurol Neurology There is limited literature comparing the clinical parameters and treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical differences and treatment outcomes in the two categories of patients, particularly the safe use of immunosuppressive therapy in immunocompromised patients. The study was a retrospective analysis of medical records of MG patients from the neuromuscular unit at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital in Kwa-Zulu Natal between 2003 and 2019. One hundred and seventy-eight (178) patients fulfilled the clinical criteria for MG. Twenty-four (13.4%) were HIV-infected and 154 (86.5%) were HIV-uninfected. There were 116 (65%) females, median 45 years, (IQR 40–62), 90 (50.5%) black African, 66 (37%) Indian, 20 (11.2%) white, and 2 (1.1%) of mixed ancestry. In the HIV-infected cohort, 20 (87%) had generalized MG, 12 (50%) bulbar, and 14 (60.9%) respiratory onset MG, 12 (50%) presented with MG Foundation of America (MGFA) class five diseases at diagnosis, six (25%) presented with MG crisis during the 5-year follow-up. Thirteen (54%) of the HIV-infected group required rescue therapy using (plasma exchange or IV immunoglobulin) combined with pulse cyclophosphamide compared with 17 (11%) in the HIV-uninfected cohort, respectively. At 5 years, 8 (33%) of the HIV-infected group remained refractory to treatment compared with 10 (6.5%) HIV-uninfected cohort, respectively. No adverse events were documented in HIV-infected patients receiving combination rescue therapy (PLEX or IVIG combined with IV cyclophosphamide). In conclusion HIV-infected MG patients are more likely to require combination rescue therapy with PE/IVIG and IV cyclophosphamide compared with those who were HIV-uninfected. No side effects were documented in the HIV-infected group receiving the above therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8553930/ /pubmed/34721269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.738813 Text en Copyright © 2021 Moodley, Bill and Patel. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Moodley, Kaminie
Bill, Pierre L. A.
Patel, Vinod B.
A Comparison of Clinical, Electro-Diagnostic, Laboratory, and Treatment Outcome Differences in a Cohort of HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Patients With Myasthenia Gravis
title A Comparison of Clinical, Electro-Diagnostic, Laboratory, and Treatment Outcome Differences in a Cohort of HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Patients With Myasthenia Gravis
title_full A Comparison of Clinical, Electro-Diagnostic, Laboratory, and Treatment Outcome Differences in a Cohort of HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Patients With Myasthenia Gravis
title_fullStr A Comparison of Clinical, Electro-Diagnostic, Laboratory, and Treatment Outcome Differences in a Cohort of HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Patients With Myasthenia Gravis
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Clinical, Electro-Diagnostic, Laboratory, and Treatment Outcome Differences in a Cohort of HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Patients With Myasthenia Gravis
title_short A Comparison of Clinical, Electro-Diagnostic, Laboratory, and Treatment Outcome Differences in a Cohort of HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Patients With Myasthenia Gravis
title_sort comparison of clinical, electro-diagnostic, laboratory, and treatment outcome differences in a cohort of hiv-infected and hiv-uninfected patients with myasthenia gravis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.738813
work_keys_str_mv AT moodleykaminie acomparisonofclinicalelectrodiagnosticlaboratoryandtreatmentoutcomedifferencesinacohortofhivinfectedandhivuninfectedpatientswithmyastheniagravis
AT billpierrela acomparisonofclinicalelectrodiagnosticlaboratoryandtreatmentoutcomedifferencesinacohortofhivinfectedandhivuninfectedpatientswithmyastheniagravis
AT patelvinodb acomparisonofclinicalelectrodiagnosticlaboratoryandtreatmentoutcomedifferencesinacohortofhivinfectedandhivuninfectedpatientswithmyastheniagravis
AT moodleykaminie comparisonofclinicalelectrodiagnosticlaboratoryandtreatmentoutcomedifferencesinacohortofhivinfectedandhivuninfectedpatientswithmyastheniagravis
AT billpierrela comparisonofclinicalelectrodiagnosticlaboratoryandtreatmentoutcomedifferencesinacohortofhivinfectedandhivuninfectedpatientswithmyastheniagravis
AT patelvinodb comparisonofclinicalelectrodiagnosticlaboratoryandtreatmentoutcomedifferencesinacohortofhivinfectedandhivuninfectedpatientswithmyastheniagravis