Cargando…
Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: What’s new?
Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widespread procedure to address end stage osteoarthritis with good results, clinical outcomes, and long-term survivorship. Although it is frequently performed in elderly, an increased demand in young and active people is expected in the next years. However,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754829 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.732 |
_version_ | 1784591778798632960 |
---|---|
author | Sabatini, Luigi Barberis, Luca Camazzola, Daniele Centola, Michele Capella, Marcello Bistolfi, Alessandro Schiraldi, Marco Massè, Alessandro |
author_facet | Sabatini, Luigi Barberis, Luca Camazzola, Daniele Centola, Michele Capella, Marcello Bistolfi, Alessandro Schiraldi, Marco Massè, Alessandro |
author_sort | Sabatini, Luigi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widespread procedure to address end stage osteoarthritis with good results, clinical outcomes, and long-term survivorship. Although it is frequently performed in elderly, an increased demand in young and active people is expected in the next years. However, a considerable dissatisfaction rate has been reported by highly demanding patients due to the intrinsic limitations provided by the TKA. Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) TKA was developed to mimic knee biomechanics, through anterior cruciate ligament preservation. First-generation BCR TKA has not gained popularity due to its being a challenging technique and having poor survival outcomes. Thanks to implant design improvement and surgeon-friendly instrumentation, second-generation BCR TKA has seen renewed interest. This review will focus on surgical indications, kinematical basis, clinical results and latest developments of second-generation BCR TKA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8554348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85543482021-11-08 Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: What’s new? Sabatini, Luigi Barberis, Luca Camazzola, Daniele Centola, Michele Capella, Marcello Bistolfi, Alessandro Schiraldi, Marco Massè, Alessandro World J Orthop Minireviews Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widespread procedure to address end stage osteoarthritis with good results, clinical outcomes, and long-term survivorship. Although it is frequently performed in elderly, an increased demand in young and active people is expected in the next years. However, a considerable dissatisfaction rate has been reported by highly demanding patients due to the intrinsic limitations provided by the TKA. Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) TKA was developed to mimic knee biomechanics, through anterior cruciate ligament preservation. First-generation BCR TKA has not gained popularity due to its being a challenging technique and having poor survival outcomes. Thanks to implant design improvement and surgeon-friendly instrumentation, second-generation BCR TKA has seen renewed interest. This review will focus on surgical indications, kinematical basis, clinical results and latest developments of second-generation BCR TKA. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8554348/ /pubmed/34754829 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.732 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Sabatini, Luigi Barberis, Luca Camazzola, Daniele Centola, Michele Capella, Marcello Bistolfi, Alessandro Schiraldi, Marco Massè, Alessandro Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: What’s new? |
title | Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: What’s new? |
title_full | Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: What’s new? |
title_fullStr | Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: What’s new? |
title_full_unstemmed | Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: What’s new? |
title_short | Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: What’s new? |
title_sort | bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: what’s new? |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754829 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabatiniluigi bicruciateretainingtotalkneearthroplastywhatsnew AT barberisluca bicruciateretainingtotalkneearthroplastywhatsnew AT camazzoladaniele bicruciateretainingtotalkneearthroplastywhatsnew AT centolamichele bicruciateretainingtotalkneearthroplastywhatsnew AT capellamarcello bicruciateretainingtotalkneearthroplastywhatsnew AT bistolfialessandro bicruciateretainingtotalkneearthroplastywhatsnew AT schiraldimarco bicruciateretainingtotalkneearthroplastywhatsnew AT massealessandro bicruciateretainingtotalkneearthroplastywhatsnew |