Cargando…

Utility of oral glucose tolerance test in predicting type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: Towards personalized care

BACKGROUND: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at a seven-fold higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) within 7-10 years after childbirth, compared with those with normoglycemic pregnancy. Although raised fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels has been said to be the main signifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayoumi, Riad Abdel Latif, Khamis, Amar Hassan, Tahlak, Muna A, Elgergawi, Taghrid F, Harb, Deemah K, Hazari, Komal S, Abdelkareem, Widad A, Issa, Aya O, Choudhury, Rakeeb, Hassanein, Mohamed, Lakshmanan, Jeyaseelan, Alawadi, Fatheya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754378
http://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v12.i10.1778
_version_ 1784591782982451200
author Bayoumi, Riad Abdel Latif
Khamis, Amar Hassan
Tahlak, Muna A
Elgergawi, Taghrid F
Harb, Deemah K
Hazari, Komal S
Abdelkareem, Widad A
Issa, Aya O
Choudhury, Rakeeb
Hassanein, Mohamed
Lakshmanan, Jeyaseelan
Alawadi, Fatheya
author_facet Bayoumi, Riad Abdel Latif
Khamis, Amar Hassan
Tahlak, Muna A
Elgergawi, Taghrid F
Harb, Deemah K
Hazari, Komal S
Abdelkareem, Widad A
Issa, Aya O
Choudhury, Rakeeb
Hassanein, Mohamed
Lakshmanan, Jeyaseelan
Alawadi, Fatheya
author_sort Bayoumi, Riad Abdel Latif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at a seven-fold higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) within 7-10 years after childbirth, compared with those with normoglycemic pregnancy. Although raised fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels has been said to be the main significant predictor of postpartum progression to T2D, it is difficult to predict who among the women with GDM would develop T2D. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study to examine the glycemic indices that can predict postnatal T2D in Emirati Arab women with a history of GDM. AIM: To assess how oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) can identify the distinct GDM pathophysiology and predict possible distinct postnatal T2D subtypes. METHODS: The glycemic status of a cohort of 4603 pregnant Emirati Arab women, who delivered in 2007 at both Latifa Women and Children Hospital and at Dubai Hospital, United Arab Emirates, was assessed retrospectively, using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. Of the total, 1231 women were followed up and assessed in 2016. The FBG and/or the 2-h blood glucose (2hrBG) levels after a 75-g glucose load were measured to assess the prevalence of GDM and T2D, according to the IADPSG and American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the OGTT was plotted and sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of FBG and 2hrBG for T2D were determined. RESULTS: Considering both FBG and 2hrBG levels, according to the IADPSG criteria, the prevalence of GDM in pregnant Emirati women in 2007 was 1057/4603 (23%), while the prevalence of pre-pregnancy T2D among them, based on ADA criteria, was 230/4603 (5%). In the subset of women (n = 1231) followed up in 2016, the prevalence of GDM in 2007 was 362/1231 (29.6%), while the prevalence of pre-pregnancy T2D was 36/1231 (2.9%). Of the 362 pregnant women with GDM in 2007, 96/362 (26.5%) developed T2D; 142/362 (39.2%) developed impaired fasting glucose; 29/362 (8.0%) developed impaired glucose tolerance, and the remaining 95/362 (26.2%) had normal glycemia in 2016. The prevalence of T2D, based on ADA criteria, stemmed from the prevalence of 36/1231 (2.9%) in 2007 to 141/1231 (11.5%), in 2016. The positive predictive value (PPV) for FBG suggests that if a woman tested positive for GDM in 2007, the probability of developing T2D in 2016 was approximately 24%. The opposite was observed when 2hrBG was used for diagnosis. The PPV value for 2hrBG suggests that if a woman was positive for GDM in 2007 then the probability of developing T2D in 2016 was only 3%. CONCLUSION: FBG and 2hrBG could predict postpartum T2D, following antenatal GDM. However, each test reflects different pathophysiology and possible T2D subtype and could be matched with a relevant T2D prevention program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8554365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85543652021-11-08 Utility of oral glucose tolerance test in predicting type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: Towards personalized care Bayoumi, Riad Abdel Latif Khamis, Amar Hassan Tahlak, Muna A Elgergawi, Taghrid F Harb, Deemah K Hazari, Komal S Abdelkareem, Widad A Issa, Aya O Choudhury, Rakeeb Hassanein, Mohamed Lakshmanan, Jeyaseelan Alawadi, Fatheya World J Diabetes Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at a seven-fold higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) within 7-10 years after childbirth, compared with those with normoglycemic pregnancy. Although raised fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels has been said to be the main significant predictor of postpartum progression to T2D, it is difficult to predict who among the women with GDM would develop T2D. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study to examine the glycemic indices that can predict postnatal T2D in Emirati Arab women with a history of GDM. AIM: To assess how oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) can identify the distinct GDM pathophysiology and predict possible distinct postnatal T2D subtypes. METHODS: The glycemic status of a cohort of 4603 pregnant Emirati Arab women, who delivered in 2007 at both Latifa Women and Children Hospital and at Dubai Hospital, United Arab Emirates, was assessed retrospectively, using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. Of the total, 1231 women were followed up and assessed in 2016. The FBG and/or the 2-h blood glucose (2hrBG) levels after a 75-g glucose load were measured to assess the prevalence of GDM and T2D, according to the IADPSG and American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the OGTT was plotted and sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of FBG and 2hrBG for T2D were determined. RESULTS: Considering both FBG and 2hrBG levels, according to the IADPSG criteria, the prevalence of GDM in pregnant Emirati women in 2007 was 1057/4603 (23%), while the prevalence of pre-pregnancy T2D among them, based on ADA criteria, was 230/4603 (5%). In the subset of women (n = 1231) followed up in 2016, the prevalence of GDM in 2007 was 362/1231 (29.6%), while the prevalence of pre-pregnancy T2D was 36/1231 (2.9%). Of the 362 pregnant women with GDM in 2007, 96/362 (26.5%) developed T2D; 142/362 (39.2%) developed impaired fasting glucose; 29/362 (8.0%) developed impaired glucose tolerance, and the remaining 95/362 (26.2%) had normal glycemia in 2016. The prevalence of T2D, based on ADA criteria, stemmed from the prevalence of 36/1231 (2.9%) in 2007 to 141/1231 (11.5%), in 2016. The positive predictive value (PPV) for FBG suggests that if a woman tested positive for GDM in 2007, the probability of developing T2D in 2016 was approximately 24%. The opposite was observed when 2hrBG was used for diagnosis. The PPV value for 2hrBG suggests that if a woman was positive for GDM in 2007 then the probability of developing T2D in 2016 was only 3%. CONCLUSION: FBG and 2hrBG could predict postpartum T2D, following antenatal GDM. However, each test reflects different pathophysiology and possible T2D subtype and could be matched with a relevant T2D prevention program. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-10-15 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8554365/ /pubmed/34754378 http://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v12.i10.1778 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Bayoumi, Riad Abdel Latif
Khamis, Amar Hassan
Tahlak, Muna A
Elgergawi, Taghrid F
Harb, Deemah K
Hazari, Komal S
Abdelkareem, Widad A
Issa, Aya O
Choudhury, Rakeeb
Hassanein, Mohamed
Lakshmanan, Jeyaseelan
Alawadi, Fatheya
Utility of oral glucose tolerance test in predicting type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: Towards personalized care
title Utility of oral glucose tolerance test in predicting type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: Towards personalized care
title_full Utility of oral glucose tolerance test in predicting type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: Towards personalized care
title_fullStr Utility of oral glucose tolerance test in predicting type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: Towards personalized care
title_full_unstemmed Utility of oral glucose tolerance test in predicting type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: Towards personalized care
title_short Utility of oral glucose tolerance test in predicting type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: Towards personalized care
title_sort utility of oral glucose tolerance test in predicting type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes: towards personalized care
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754378
http://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v12.i10.1778
work_keys_str_mv AT bayoumiriadabdellatif utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT khamisamarhassan utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT tahlakmunaa utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT elgergawitaghridf utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT harbdeemahk utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT hazarikomals utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT abdelkareemwidada utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT issaayao utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT choudhuryrakeeb utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT hassaneinmohamed utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT lakshmananjeyaseelan utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare
AT alawadifatheya utilityoforalglucosetolerancetestinpredictingtype2diabetesfollowinggestationaldiabetestowardspersonalizedcare