Cargando…

The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans’ Perspectives on an “Everyday SDM” Compromise

Introduction. Detailed or “full” shared decision making (SDM) about cancer screening is difficult in the primary care setting. Time spent discussing cancer screening is time not spent on other important issues. Given time constraints, brief SDM that is incomplete but addresses key elements may be fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caverly, Tanner J., Skurla, Sarah E., Robinson, Claire H., Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J., Hayward, Rodney A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683211055120
_version_ 1784591828610187264
author Caverly, Tanner J.
Skurla, Sarah E.
Robinson, Claire H.
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
Hayward, Rodney A.
author_facet Caverly, Tanner J.
Skurla, Sarah E.
Robinson, Claire H.
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
Hayward, Rodney A.
author_sort Caverly, Tanner J.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Detailed or “full” shared decision making (SDM) about cancer screening is difficult in the primary care setting. Time spent discussing cancer screening is time not spent on other important issues. Given time constraints, brief SDM that is incomplete but addresses key elements may be feasible and acceptable. However, little is known about how patients feel about abbreviated SDM. This study assessed patient perspectives on a compromise solution (“everyday SDM”): 1) primary care provided makes a tailored recommendation, 2) briefly presents qualitative information on key tradeoffs, and 3) conveys full support for decisional autonomy and desires for more information. Methods. We recruited a stratified random sample of Veterans from an academic Veterans Affairs medical center who were eligible for lung cancer screening, oversampling women and minority patients, to attend a 6-hour deliberative focus group. Experts informed participants about cancer screening, factors that influence screening benefits, and the role of patient preferences. Then, facilitator-led small groups elicited patient questions and informed opinions about the everyday SDM proposal, its acceptability, and their recommendations for improvement. Results. Thirty-six Veterans with a heavy smoking history participated (50% male, 83% white). There was a strong consensus that everyday SDM was acceptable if patients were the final deciders and could get more information on request. Participants broadly recommended that clinicians only mention downsides directly related to screening and avoid discussion of potential downstream harms (such as biopsies). Discussion. Although further testing in more diverse populations and different conditions is needed, these patients found the everyday SDM approach to be acceptable for routine lung cancer screening discussions, despite its use of an explicit recommendation and presentation of only qualitative information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8554567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85545672021-10-30 The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans’ Perspectives on an “Everyday SDM” Compromise Caverly, Tanner J. Skurla, Sarah E. Robinson, Claire H. Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. Hayward, Rodney A. MDM Policy Pract Original Article Introduction. Detailed or “full” shared decision making (SDM) about cancer screening is difficult in the primary care setting. Time spent discussing cancer screening is time not spent on other important issues. Given time constraints, brief SDM that is incomplete but addresses key elements may be feasible and acceptable. However, little is known about how patients feel about abbreviated SDM. This study assessed patient perspectives on a compromise solution (“everyday SDM”): 1) primary care provided makes a tailored recommendation, 2) briefly presents qualitative information on key tradeoffs, and 3) conveys full support for decisional autonomy and desires for more information. Methods. We recruited a stratified random sample of Veterans from an academic Veterans Affairs medical center who were eligible for lung cancer screening, oversampling women and minority patients, to attend a 6-hour deliberative focus group. Experts informed participants about cancer screening, factors that influence screening benefits, and the role of patient preferences. Then, facilitator-led small groups elicited patient questions and informed opinions about the everyday SDM proposal, its acceptability, and their recommendations for improvement. Results. Thirty-six Veterans with a heavy smoking history participated (50% male, 83% white). There was a strong consensus that everyday SDM was acceptable if patients were the final deciders and could get more information on request. Participants broadly recommended that clinicians only mention downsides directly related to screening and avoid discussion of potential downstream harms (such as biopsies). Discussion. Although further testing in more diverse populations and different conditions is needed, these patients found the everyday SDM approach to be acceptable for routine lung cancer screening discussions, despite its use of an explicit recommendation and presentation of only qualitative information. SAGE Publications 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8554567/ /pubmed/34722882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683211055120 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Caverly, Tanner J.
Skurla, Sarah E.
Robinson, Claire H.
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
Hayward, Rodney A.
The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans’ Perspectives on an “Everyday SDM” Compromise
title The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans’ Perspectives on an “Everyday SDM” Compromise
title_full The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans’ Perspectives on an “Everyday SDM” Compromise
title_fullStr The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans’ Perspectives on an “Everyday SDM” Compromise
title_full_unstemmed The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans’ Perspectives on an “Everyday SDM” Compromise
title_short The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans’ Perspectives on an “Everyday SDM” Compromise
title_sort need for brevity during shared decision making (sdm) for cancer screening: veterans’ perspectives on an “everyday sdm” compromise
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683211055120
work_keys_str_mv AT caverlytannerj theneedforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise
AT skurlasarahe theneedforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise
AT robinsonclaireh theneedforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise
AT zikmundfisherbrianj theneedforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise
AT haywardrodneya theneedforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise
AT caverlytannerj needforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise
AT skurlasarahe needforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise
AT robinsonclaireh needforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise
AT zikmundfisherbrianj needforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise
AT haywardrodneya needforbrevityduringshareddecisionmakingsdmforcancerscreeningveteransperspectivesonaneverydaysdmcompromise