Oesophageal adenocarcinoma: In the era of extended lymphadenectomy, is the value of neoadjuvant therapy being attenuated?

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and oesophagectomy is the standard of care for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinomas. Survival outcomes following resection have been improving over time while NACT remain largely unchanged. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis of randomized control trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit in adding NACT, raising the possibility that improved surgical techniques may be reducing the perceived effectiveness of NACT. AIM: To compare the effect of addition of NACT to a standardized surgery and lymphadenectomy on overall and disease-free survival in patients undergoing curative oesophagectomy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patient data were analysed from a prospectively maintained surgical survival database. Demographic, surgical, and survival outcomes were compared between groups according to treatment and nodal count. RESULTS: The data of 243 consecutive patients were identified. 79 patients were given NACT and 162 had surgery only. The NACT group were younger, and there was less frequent stage I adenocarcinoma. Overall survival was similar between NACT and surgery only groups (5YS: 48.7% vs 42.5%; P = 0.113), as was disease-free survival (5YS: 40.6% vs 39.9%; P = 0.635). There were ≥ 30 nodes removed in 46 patients, and < 30 in 197 patients, but were otherwise similar. There was improved survival in patients with ≥ 30 nodes removed than those with < 30 nodes (5YS: 64.4% vs 40.7%; P = 0.015), and a better disease-free survival that neared significance (5YS: 54.9% vs 36.6%; P = 0.078). CONCLUSION: NACT did not appear to affect overall or disease-free survival. However, an overall survival benefit was observed in patients with ≥ 30 lymph nodes removed, and a benefit in disease-free survival which was not significant.