Cargando…

The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget

Surface observations have recorded large and incompletely understood changes to atmospheric methane (CH(4)) this century. However, their ability to reveal the responsible surface sources and sinks is limited by their geographical distribution, which is biased towards the northern midlatitudes. Data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmer, Paul I., Feng, Liang, Lunt, Mark F., Parker, Robert J., Bösch, Hartmut, Lan, Xin, Lorente, Alba, Borsdorff, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0106
_version_ 1784591867722072064
author Palmer, Paul I.
Feng, Liang
Lunt, Mark F.
Parker, Robert J.
Bösch, Hartmut
Lan, Xin
Lorente, Alba
Borsdorff, Tobias
author_facet Palmer, Paul I.
Feng, Liang
Lunt, Mark F.
Parker, Robert J.
Bösch, Hartmut
Lan, Xin
Lorente, Alba
Borsdorff, Tobias
author_sort Palmer, Paul I.
collection PubMed
description Surface observations have recorded large and incompletely understood changes to atmospheric methane (CH(4)) this century. However, their ability to reveal the responsible surface sources and sinks is limited by their geographical distribution, which is biased towards the northern midlatitudes. Data from Earth-orbiting satellites designed specifically to measure atmospheric CH(4) have been available since 2009 with the launch of the Japanese Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT). We assess the added value of GOSAT to data collected by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which have been the lynchpin for knowledge about atmospheric CH(4) since the 1980s. To achieve that we use the GEOS-Chem atmospheric chemistry transport model and an inverse method to infer a posteriori flux estimates from the NOAA and GOSAT data using common a priori emission inventories. We find the main benefit of GOSAT data is from its additional coverage over the tropics where we report large increases since the 2014/2016 El Niño, driven by biomass burning, biogenic emissions and energy production. We use data from the European TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument to show how better spatial coverage and resolution measurements allow us to quantify previously unattainable diffuse sources of CH(4), thereby opening up a new research frontier. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8554821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85548212022-02-02 The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget Palmer, Paul I. Feng, Liang Lunt, Mark F. Parker, Robert J. Bösch, Hartmut Lan, Xin Lorente, Alba Borsdorff, Tobias Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles Surface observations have recorded large and incompletely understood changes to atmospheric methane (CH(4)) this century. However, their ability to reveal the responsible surface sources and sinks is limited by their geographical distribution, which is biased towards the northern midlatitudes. Data from Earth-orbiting satellites designed specifically to measure atmospheric CH(4) have been available since 2009 with the launch of the Japanese Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT). We assess the added value of GOSAT to data collected by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which have been the lynchpin for knowledge about atmospheric CH(4) since the 1980s. To achieve that we use the GEOS-Chem atmospheric chemistry transport model and an inverse method to infer a posteriori flux estimates from the NOAA and GOSAT data using common a priori emission inventories. We find the main benefit of GOSAT data is from its additional coverage over the tropics where we report large increases since the 2014/2016 El Niño, driven by biomass burning, biogenic emissions and energy production. We use data from the European TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument to show how better spatial coverage and resolution measurements allow us to quantify previously unattainable diffuse sources of CH(4), thereby opening up a new research frontier. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)’. The Royal Society 2021-11-15 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8554821/ /pubmed/34565220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0106 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Palmer, Paul I.
Feng, Liang
Lunt, Mark F.
Parker, Robert J.
Bösch, Hartmut
Lan, Xin
Lorente, Alba
Borsdorff, Tobias
The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget
title The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget
title_full The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget
title_fullStr The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget
title_full_unstemmed The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget
title_short The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget
title_sort added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0106
work_keys_str_mv AT palmerpauli theaddedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT fengliang theaddedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT luntmarkf theaddedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT parkerrobertj theaddedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT boschhartmut theaddedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT lanxin theaddedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT lorentealba theaddedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT borsdorfftobias theaddedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT palmerpauli addedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT fengliang addedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT luntmarkf addedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT parkerrobertj addedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT boschhartmut addedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT lanxin addedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT lorentealba addedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget
AT borsdorfftobias addedvalueofsatelliteobservationsofmethaneforunderstandingthecontemporarymethanebudget