Cargando…
Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) to cardiac catheterization is safer than the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), with similar clinical effectiveness. However, adoption of TRA remains low, representing less than 50% of catheterization procedures in 2015. Peer coaching is one approach...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5 |
_version_ | 1784591879709392896 |
---|---|
author | Duan, Kevin I. Helfrich, Christian D. Rao, Sunil V. Neely, Emily L. Sulc, Christine A. Naranjo, Diana Wong, Edwin S. |
author_facet | Duan, Kevin I. Helfrich, Christian D. Rao, Sunil V. Neely, Emily L. Sulc, Christine A. Naranjo, Diana Wong, Edwin S. |
author_sort | Duan, Kevin I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) to cardiac catheterization is safer than the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), with similar clinical effectiveness. However, adoption of TRA remains low, representing less than 50% of catheterization procedures in 2015. Peer coaching is one approach to facilitate implementation; however, the costs of this strategy for cardiac procedures such as TRA are unclear. METHODS: We conducted an activity-based costing analysis (ABC) of a multi-center, hybrid type III implementation trial of a coaching intervention designed to increase the use of TRA. We identified the key activities of the intervention and determined the personnel, resources, and time needed to complete each activity. The personnel cost per hour and the activity duration were then used to estimate the cost of each activity and the total variable cost of the implementation. Fixed costs related to designing and running the implementation were calculated separately. All costs are reported in 2019 constant US dollars. RESULTS: The total cost of the coaching intervention implementation was $374,863. Of the total cost, $367,752 were variable costs due to travel, preparatory work, in-person coaching, post-intervention evaluation, and administrative time. We estimated fixed costs of $7112. The mean marginal cost of implementing the intervention at only one additional medical center was $52,536. CONCLUSIONS: We provide granular cost estimates of a conceptually rooted implementation strategy designed to increase the uptake of TRA for cardiac catheterization. We estimate that implementation costs stemming from the coaching approach would be offset after the conversion of approximately 409 to 1363 catheterizations from TFA to TRA. Our estimates provide benchmarks of the expected costs of implementing evidence-based, but expertise-intensive, cardiac procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN66341299. Registered 7 July 2020—retrospectively registered SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8554885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85548852021-11-01 Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention Duan, Kevin I. Helfrich, Christian D. Rao, Sunil V. Neely, Emily L. Sulc, Christine A. Naranjo, Diana Wong, Edwin S. Implement Sci Commun Research BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) to cardiac catheterization is safer than the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), with similar clinical effectiveness. However, adoption of TRA remains low, representing less than 50% of catheterization procedures in 2015. Peer coaching is one approach to facilitate implementation; however, the costs of this strategy for cardiac procedures such as TRA are unclear. METHODS: We conducted an activity-based costing analysis (ABC) of a multi-center, hybrid type III implementation trial of a coaching intervention designed to increase the use of TRA. We identified the key activities of the intervention and determined the personnel, resources, and time needed to complete each activity. The personnel cost per hour and the activity duration were then used to estimate the cost of each activity and the total variable cost of the implementation. Fixed costs related to designing and running the implementation were calculated separately. All costs are reported in 2019 constant US dollars. RESULTS: The total cost of the coaching intervention implementation was $374,863. Of the total cost, $367,752 were variable costs due to travel, preparatory work, in-person coaching, post-intervention evaluation, and administrative time. We estimated fixed costs of $7112. The mean marginal cost of implementing the intervention at only one additional medical center was $52,536. CONCLUSIONS: We provide granular cost estimates of a conceptually rooted implementation strategy designed to increase the uptake of TRA for cardiac catheterization. We estimate that implementation costs stemming from the coaching approach would be offset after the conversion of approximately 409 to 1363 catheterizations from TFA to TRA. Our estimates provide benchmarks of the expected costs of implementing evidence-based, but expertise-intensive, cardiac procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN66341299. Registered 7 July 2020—retrospectively registered SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5. BioMed Central 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8554885/ /pubmed/34706775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Duan, Kevin I. Helfrich, Christian D. Rao, Sunil V. Neely, Emily L. Sulc, Christine A. Naranjo, Diana Wong, Edwin S. Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention |
title | Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_full | Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_fullStr | Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_short | Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_sort | cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duankevini costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT helfrichchristiand costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT raosunilv costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT neelyemilyl costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT sulcchristinea costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT naranjodiana costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT wongedwins costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention |