Cargando…

Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) to cardiac catheterization is safer than the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), with similar clinical effectiveness. However, adoption of TRA remains low, representing less than 50% of catheterization procedures in 2015. Peer coaching is one approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Kevin I., Helfrich, Christian D., Rao, Sunil V., Neely, Emily L., Sulc, Christine A., Naranjo, Diana, Wong, Edwin S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5
_version_ 1784591879709392896
author Duan, Kevin I.
Helfrich, Christian D.
Rao, Sunil V.
Neely, Emily L.
Sulc, Christine A.
Naranjo, Diana
Wong, Edwin S.
author_facet Duan, Kevin I.
Helfrich, Christian D.
Rao, Sunil V.
Neely, Emily L.
Sulc, Christine A.
Naranjo, Diana
Wong, Edwin S.
author_sort Duan, Kevin I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) to cardiac catheterization is safer than the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), with similar clinical effectiveness. However, adoption of TRA remains low, representing less than 50% of catheterization procedures in 2015. Peer coaching is one approach to facilitate implementation; however, the costs of this strategy for cardiac procedures such as TRA are unclear. METHODS: We conducted an activity-based costing analysis (ABC) of a multi-center, hybrid type III implementation trial of a coaching intervention designed to increase the use of TRA. We identified the key activities of the intervention and determined the personnel, resources, and time needed to complete each activity. The personnel cost per hour and the activity duration were then used to estimate the cost of each activity and the total variable cost of the implementation. Fixed costs related to designing and running the implementation were calculated separately. All costs are reported in 2019 constant US dollars. RESULTS: The total cost of the coaching intervention implementation was $374,863. Of the total cost, $367,752 were variable costs due to travel, preparatory work, in-person coaching, post-intervention evaluation, and administrative time. We estimated fixed costs of $7112. The mean marginal cost of implementing the intervention at only one additional medical center was $52,536. CONCLUSIONS: We provide granular cost estimates of a conceptually rooted implementation strategy designed to increase the uptake of TRA for cardiac catheterization. We estimate that implementation costs stemming from the coaching approach would be offset after the conversion of approximately 409 to 1363 catheterizations from TFA to TRA. Our estimates provide benchmarks of the expected costs of implementing evidence-based, but expertise-intensive, cardiac procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN66341299. Registered 7 July 2020—retrospectively registered SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8554885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85548852021-11-01 Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention Duan, Kevin I. Helfrich, Christian D. Rao, Sunil V. Neely, Emily L. Sulc, Christine A. Naranjo, Diana Wong, Edwin S. Implement Sci Commun Research BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) to cardiac catheterization is safer than the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), with similar clinical effectiveness. However, adoption of TRA remains low, representing less than 50% of catheterization procedures in 2015. Peer coaching is one approach to facilitate implementation; however, the costs of this strategy for cardiac procedures such as TRA are unclear. METHODS: We conducted an activity-based costing analysis (ABC) of a multi-center, hybrid type III implementation trial of a coaching intervention designed to increase the use of TRA. We identified the key activities of the intervention and determined the personnel, resources, and time needed to complete each activity. The personnel cost per hour and the activity duration were then used to estimate the cost of each activity and the total variable cost of the implementation. Fixed costs related to designing and running the implementation were calculated separately. All costs are reported in 2019 constant US dollars. RESULTS: The total cost of the coaching intervention implementation was $374,863. Of the total cost, $367,752 were variable costs due to travel, preparatory work, in-person coaching, post-intervention evaluation, and administrative time. We estimated fixed costs of $7112. The mean marginal cost of implementing the intervention at only one additional medical center was $52,536. CONCLUSIONS: We provide granular cost estimates of a conceptually rooted implementation strategy designed to increase the uptake of TRA for cardiac catheterization. We estimate that implementation costs stemming from the coaching approach would be offset after the conversion of approximately 409 to 1363 catheterizations from TFA to TRA. Our estimates provide benchmarks of the expected costs of implementing evidence-based, but expertise-intensive, cardiac procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN66341299. Registered 7 July 2020—retrospectively registered SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5. BioMed Central 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8554885/ /pubmed/34706775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Duan, Kevin I.
Helfrich, Christian D.
Rao, Sunil V.
Neely, Emily L.
Sulc, Christine A.
Naranjo, Diana
Wong, Edwin S.
Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
title Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
title_fullStr Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full_unstemmed Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
title_short Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
title_sort cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5
work_keys_str_mv AT duankevini costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT helfrichchristiand costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT raosunilv costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT neelyemilyl costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT sulcchristinea costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT naranjodiana costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT wongedwins costanalysisofacoachinginterventiontoincreaseuseoftransradialpercutaneouscoronaryintervention