Cargando…
Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) to cardiac catheterization is safer than the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), with similar clinical effectiveness. However, adoption of TRA remains low, representing less than 50% of catheterization procedures in 2015. Peer coaching is one approach...
Autores principales: | Duan, Kevin I., Helfrich, Christian D., Rao, Sunil V., Neely, Emily L., Sulc, Christine A., Naranjo, Diana, Wong, Edwin S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00219-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Costs and Benefits Associated With Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China
por: Jin, Chen, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The Feasibility of Percutaneous Transradial Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion
por: Kim, Jang-Young, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Balloon-assisted tracking for challenging transradial percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Agelaki, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Risk‐Treatment Paradox in the Selection of Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Wimmer, Neil J., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Mediastinal Hematoma and Tracheal Compression following Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Smilowitz, Nathaniel R., et al.
Publicado: (2018)