Cargando…

Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Soft Tissue Neoplasms: Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2WI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Features-Based Models

Machine learning has been widely used in the characterization of tumors recently. This article aims to explore the feasibility of the whole tumor fat-suppressed (FS) T2WI and ADC features-based least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-logistic predictive models in the differentiation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Peian, Chen, Lei, Zhou, Zhengrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00513-7
_version_ 1784591891735511040
author Hu, Peian
Chen, Lei
Zhou, Zhengrong
author_facet Hu, Peian
Chen, Lei
Zhou, Zhengrong
author_sort Hu, Peian
collection PubMed
description Machine learning has been widely used in the characterization of tumors recently. This article aims to explore the feasibility of the whole tumor fat-suppressed (FS) T2WI and ADC features-based least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-logistic predictive models in the differentiation of soft tissue neoplasms (STN). The clinical and MR findings of 160 cases with 161 histologically proven STN were reviewed, retrospectively, 75 with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI with b values of 50, 400, and 800 s/mm(2)). They were divided into benign and malignant groups and further divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. The MR FS T2WI and ADC features-based LASSO-logistic models were built and compared. The AUC of the FS T2WI features-based LASSO-logistic regression model for benign and malignant prediction was 0.65 and 0.75 for the training and validation cohorts. The model’s sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the validation cohort were 55%, 96%, and 76.6%. While the AUC of the ADC features-based model was 0.932 and 0.955 for the training and validation cohorts. The model’s sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.3%, 100%, and 91.7%. The performances of these models were also validated by decision curve analysis (DCA). The AUC of the whole tumor ADC features-based LASSO-logistic regression predictive model was larger than that of FS T2WI features (p = 0.017). The whole tumor fat-suppressed T2WI and ADC features-based LASSO-logistic predictive models both can serve as useful tools in the differentiation of STN. ADC features-based LASSO-logistic regression predictive model did better than that of FS T2WI features.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8554992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85549922021-11-10 Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Soft Tissue Neoplasms: Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2WI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Features-Based Models Hu, Peian Chen, Lei Zhou, Zhengrong J Digit Imaging Original Paper Machine learning has been widely used in the characterization of tumors recently. This article aims to explore the feasibility of the whole tumor fat-suppressed (FS) T2WI and ADC features-based least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-logistic predictive models in the differentiation of soft tissue neoplasms (STN). The clinical and MR findings of 160 cases with 161 histologically proven STN were reviewed, retrospectively, 75 with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI with b values of 50, 400, and 800 s/mm(2)). They were divided into benign and malignant groups and further divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. The MR FS T2WI and ADC features-based LASSO-logistic models were built and compared. The AUC of the FS T2WI features-based LASSO-logistic regression model for benign and malignant prediction was 0.65 and 0.75 for the training and validation cohorts. The model’s sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the validation cohort were 55%, 96%, and 76.6%. While the AUC of the ADC features-based model was 0.932 and 0.955 for the training and validation cohorts. The model’s sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.3%, 100%, and 91.7%. The performances of these models were also validated by decision curve analysis (DCA). The AUC of the whole tumor ADC features-based LASSO-logistic regression predictive model was larger than that of FS T2WI features (p = 0.017). The whole tumor fat-suppressed T2WI and ADC features-based LASSO-logistic predictive models both can serve as useful tools in the differentiation of STN. ADC features-based LASSO-logistic regression predictive model did better than that of FS T2WI features. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-20 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8554992/ /pubmed/34545474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00513-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hu, Peian
Chen, Lei
Zhou, Zhengrong
Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Soft Tissue Neoplasms: Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2WI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Features-Based Models
title Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Soft Tissue Neoplasms: Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2WI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Features-Based Models
title_full Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Soft Tissue Neoplasms: Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2WI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Features-Based Models
title_fullStr Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Soft Tissue Neoplasms: Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2WI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Features-Based Models
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Soft Tissue Neoplasms: Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2WI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Features-Based Models
title_short Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Soft Tissue Neoplasms: Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2WI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Features-Based Models
title_sort machine learning in the differentiation of soft tissue neoplasms: comparison of fat-suppressed t2wi and apparent diffusion coefficient (adc) features-based models
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00513-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hupeian machinelearninginthedifferentiationofsofttissueneoplasmscomparisonoffatsuppressedt2wiandapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcfeaturesbasedmodels
AT chenlei machinelearninginthedifferentiationofsofttissueneoplasmscomparisonoffatsuppressedt2wiandapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcfeaturesbasedmodels
AT zhouzhengrong machinelearninginthedifferentiationofsofttissueneoplasmscomparisonoffatsuppressedt2wiandapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcfeaturesbasedmodels