Cargando…

Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Comparative Effectiveness Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Prescribing patterns and suboptimal adherence present methodological challenges for real-world head-to-head comparisons of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in intent-to-treat studies. The aim of this study was to compare ticagrelor and clopidogrel in an on-treatment population. METHODS: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olufade, Tope, Atreja, Nipun, Bhalla, Narinder, Venditto, John, Bhandary, Durgesh, Chafekar, Kaushik, Cobden, David, Khan, Naeem D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00236-4
_version_ 1784591897182863360
author Olufade, Tope
Atreja, Nipun
Bhalla, Narinder
Venditto, John
Bhandary, Durgesh
Chafekar, Kaushik
Cobden, David
Khan, Naeem D.
author_facet Olufade, Tope
Atreja, Nipun
Bhalla, Narinder
Venditto, John
Bhandary, Durgesh
Chafekar, Kaushik
Cobden, David
Khan, Naeem D.
author_sort Olufade, Tope
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Prescribing patterns and suboptimal adherence present methodological challenges for real-world head-to-head comparisons of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in intent-to-treat studies. The aim of this study was to compare ticagrelor and clopidogrel in an on-treatment population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Optum™ Clinformatics™ database to identify patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2019. The primary end point was hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI); the secondary end point was hospitalization for major bleeding. The ticagrelor and clopidogrel cohorts were balanced by propensity score matching (PSM) 1:3 for demographic and clinical characteristics. Outcomes were ascertained from day 31 until day 365 or end of follow-up. RESULTS: Of 339,387 patients with ACS, 14,110 ticagrelor- and 57,482 clopidogrel-treated patients met the study criteria. After PSM, 13,373 ticagrelor- and 29,656 clopidogrel-treated patients provided 4945 and 13,895 patient-years of data, respectively, for the primary end point. Hospitalization for MI was significantly lower in the ticagrelor compared to the clopidogrel cohort (2.22 vs. 3.52 per 100 patient-years; 36.8% relative risk reduction [RRR]; P < 0.0001). Hospitalization for major bleeding was similar in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel cohorts (2.04 vs. 2.06 per 100 patient-years; 1.1% RRR, P = 0.9214). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world on-treatment analysis, hospitalization for MI was significantly lower with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel, with similar rates of hospitalization for major bleeding. Study findings underscore the importance of being on the appropriate guideline-recommended therapy and support the use of ticagrelor over clopidogrel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40119-021-00236-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8555031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85550312021-11-10 Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Comparative Effectiveness Analysis Olufade, Tope Atreja, Nipun Bhalla, Narinder Venditto, John Bhandary, Durgesh Chafekar, Kaushik Cobden, David Khan, Naeem D. Cardiol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Prescribing patterns and suboptimal adherence present methodological challenges for real-world head-to-head comparisons of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in intent-to-treat studies. The aim of this study was to compare ticagrelor and clopidogrel in an on-treatment population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Optum™ Clinformatics™ database to identify patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2019. The primary end point was hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI); the secondary end point was hospitalization for major bleeding. The ticagrelor and clopidogrel cohorts were balanced by propensity score matching (PSM) 1:3 for demographic and clinical characteristics. Outcomes were ascertained from day 31 until day 365 or end of follow-up. RESULTS: Of 339,387 patients with ACS, 14,110 ticagrelor- and 57,482 clopidogrel-treated patients met the study criteria. After PSM, 13,373 ticagrelor- and 29,656 clopidogrel-treated patients provided 4945 and 13,895 patient-years of data, respectively, for the primary end point. Hospitalization for MI was significantly lower in the ticagrelor compared to the clopidogrel cohort (2.22 vs. 3.52 per 100 patient-years; 36.8% relative risk reduction [RRR]; P < 0.0001). Hospitalization for major bleeding was similar in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel cohorts (2.04 vs. 2.06 per 100 patient-years; 1.1% RRR, P = 0.9214). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world on-treatment analysis, hospitalization for MI was significantly lower with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel, with similar rates of hospitalization for major bleeding. Study findings underscore the importance of being on the appropriate guideline-recommended therapy and support the use of ticagrelor over clopidogrel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40119-021-00236-4. Springer Healthcare 2021-08-13 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8555031/ /pubmed/34389941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00236-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Olufade, Tope
Atreja, Nipun
Bhalla, Narinder
Venditto, John
Bhandary, Durgesh
Chafekar, Kaushik
Cobden, David
Khan, Naeem D.
Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Comparative Effectiveness Analysis
title Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Comparative Effectiveness Analysis
title_full Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Comparative Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Comparative Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Comparative Effectiveness Analysis
title_short Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Comparative Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort hospitalization for myocardial infarction with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome: an on-treatment comparative effectiveness analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00236-4
work_keys_str_mv AT olufadetope hospitalizationformyocardialinfarctionwithticagrelororclopidogrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeanontreatmentcomparativeeffectivenessanalysis
AT atrejanipun hospitalizationformyocardialinfarctionwithticagrelororclopidogrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeanontreatmentcomparativeeffectivenessanalysis
AT bhallanarinder hospitalizationformyocardialinfarctionwithticagrelororclopidogrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeanontreatmentcomparativeeffectivenessanalysis
AT vendittojohn hospitalizationformyocardialinfarctionwithticagrelororclopidogrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeanontreatmentcomparativeeffectivenessanalysis
AT bhandarydurgesh hospitalizationformyocardialinfarctionwithticagrelororclopidogrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeanontreatmentcomparativeeffectivenessanalysis
AT chafekarkaushik hospitalizationformyocardialinfarctionwithticagrelororclopidogrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeanontreatmentcomparativeeffectivenessanalysis
AT cobdendavid hospitalizationformyocardialinfarctionwithticagrelororclopidogrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeanontreatmentcomparativeeffectivenessanalysis
AT khannaeemd hospitalizationformyocardialinfarctionwithticagrelororclopidogrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromeanontreatmentcomparativeeffectivenessanalysis