Cargando…

Complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for RESTART—a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity and obesity are global public health challenges. Older adults are important to target for prevention and management of disease and chronic conditions. However, many individuals struggle with maintaining increased physical activity (PA) and improved diet. This feasibil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deraas, Trygve S., Hopstock, Laila, Henriksen, Andre, Morseth, Bente, Sand, Anne Sofie, Njølstad, Inger, Pedersen, Sigurd, Sagelv, Edvard, Johansson, Jonas, Grimsgaard, Sameline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00921-0
_version_ 1784591910088736768
author Deraas, Trygve S.
Hopstock, Laila
Henriksen, Andre
Morseth, Bente
Sand, Anne Sofie
Njølstad, Inger
Pedersen, Sigurd
Sagelv, Edvard
Johansson, Jonas
Grimsgaard, Sameline
author_facet Deraas, Trygve S.
Hopstock, Laila
Henriksen, Andre
Morseth, Bente
Sand, Anne Sofie
Njølstad, Inger
Pedersen, Sigurd
Sagelv, Edvard
Johansson, Jonas
Grimsgaard, Sameline
author_sort Deraas, Trygve S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity and obesity are global public health challenges. Older adults are important to target for prevention and management of disease and chronic conditions. However, many individuals struggle with maintaining increased physical activity (PA) and improved diet. This feasibility study provides the foundation for the RESTART trial, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test a complex intervention to facilitate favourable lifestyle changes older adults can sustain. The primary objective of this study was to investigate study feasibility (recruitment, adherence, side-effects, and logistics) using an interdisciplinary approach. METHODS: This 1-year prospective mixed-method single-arm feasibility study was conducted in Tromsø, Norway, from September 2017. We invited by mail randomly selected participants from the seventh survey of the Tromsø Study (2015–2016) aged 55–75 years with sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and elevated cardiovascular risk. Participants attended a 6-month complex lifestyle intervention program, comprising instructor-led high-intensive exercise and nutritionist- and psychologist-led counselling, followed by a 6-month follow-up. All participants used a Polar activity tracker for daily activity monitoring during the intervention. Participants were interviewed three times throughout the study. Primary outcome was study feasibility measures. RESULTS: We invited potential participants (n=75) by mail of which 27 % (n=20) agreed to participate. Telephone screening excluded four participants, and altogether 16 participants completed baseline screening. The intervention and test procedures of primary and secondary outcomes were feasible and acceptable for the participants. There were no exercise-induced injuries, indicating that the intervention program is safe. Participants experienced that the dietary and psychological counselling were delivered too early in the intervention and in too close proximity to the start of the exercise program. Minor logistic improvements were implemented throughout the intervention period. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that it is feasible to conduct a full-scale RCT of a multi-component randomized intervention trial, based on the model of the present study. No dropouts due to exercise-induced injury indicates that the exercises were safe. While minor improvements in logistics were implemented during the intervention, we will improve recruitment and adherence strategies, rearrange schedule of intervention contents (exercise, diet, and psychology), as well as improve the content of the dietary and behavioural counselling to maximize outcome effects in the RESTART protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03807323 Registered 16 January 2019 – retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8555104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85551042021-10-29 Complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for RESTART—a randomized controlled trial Deraas, Trygve S. Hopstock, Laila Henriksen, Andre Morseth, Bente Sand, Anne Sofie Njølstad, Inger Pedersen, Sigurd Sagelv, Edvard Johansson, Jonas Grimsgaard, Sameline Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity and obesity are global public health challenges. Older adults are important to target for prevention and management of disease and chronic conditions. However, many individuals struggle with maintaining increased physical activity (PA) and improved diet. This feasibility study provides the foundation for the RESTART trial, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test a complex intervention to facilitate favourable lifestyle changes older adults can sustain. The primary objective of this study was to investigate study feasibility (recruitment, adherence, side-effects, and logistics) using an interdisciplinary approach. METHODS: This 1-year prospective mixed-method single-arm feasibility study was conducted in Tromsø, Norway, from September 2017. We invited by mail randomly selected participants from the seventh survey of the Tromsø Study (2015–2016) aged 55–75 years with sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and elevated cardiovascular risk. Participants attended a 6-month complex lifestyle intervention program, comprising instructor-led high-intensive exercise and nutritionist- and psychologist-led counselling, followed by a 6-month follow-up. All participants used a Polar activity tracker for daily activity monitoring during the intervention. Participants were interviewed three times throughout the study. Primary outcome was study feasibility measures. RESULTS: We invited potential participants (n=75) by mail of which 27 % (n=20) agreed to participate. Telephone screening excluded four participants, and altogether 16 participants completed baseline screening. The intervention and test procedures of primary and secondary outcomes were feasible and acceptable for the participants. There were no exercise-induced injuries, indicating that the intervention program is safe. Participants experienced that the dietary and psychological counselling were delivered too early in the intervention and in too close proximity to the start of the exercise program. Minor logistic improvements were implemented throughout the intervention period. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that it is feasible to conduct a full-scale RCT of a multi-component randomized intervention trial, based on the model of the present study. No dropouts due to exercise-induced injury indicates that the exercises were safe. While minor improvements in logistics were implemented during the intervention, we will improve recruitment and adherence strategies, rearrange schedule of intervention contents (exercise, diet, and psychology), as well as improve the content of the dietary and behavioural counselling to maximize outcome effects in the RESTART protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03807323 Registered 16 January 2019 – retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8555104/ /pubmed/34706777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00921-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Deraas, Trygve S.
Hopstock, Laila
Henriksen, Andre
Morseth, Bente
Sand, Anne Sofie
Njølstad, Inger
Pedersen, Sigurd
Sagelv, Edvard
Johansson, Jonas
Grimsgaard, Sameline
Complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for RESTART—a randomized controlled trial
title Complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for RESTART—a randomized controlled trial
title_full Complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for RESTART—a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for RESTART—a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for RESTART—a randomized controlled trial
title_short Complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for RESTART—a randomized controlled trial
title_sort complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for restart—a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00921-0
work_keys_str_mv AT deraastrygves complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hopstocklaila complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT henriksenandre complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT morsethbente complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sandannesofie complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT njølstadinger complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pedersensigurd complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sagelvedvard complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT johanssonjonas complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT grimsgaardsameline complexlifestyleinterventionamonginactiveolderadultswithelevatedcardiovasculardiseaseriskandobesityamixedmethodsinglearmfeasibilitystudyforrestartarandomizedcontrolledtrial