Cargando…
A comparison of the Food and Drug Administration’s and Health Canada’s regulatory decisions about failed confirmatory trials for oncology drugs: an observational study
BACKGROUND: Oncology drugs are frequently approved on the basis of surrogate outcomes that require further trials to confirm the benefits, but at times these trials fail and regulators need to decide whether to withdraw approval for the indication and/or to remove the drug from the market. This stud...
Autor principal: | Lexchin, Joel |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00375-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Information about confirmatory studies required for new drugs conditionally approved by Health Canada: A cross-sectional study
por: Lexchin, Joel
Publicado: (2022) -
New drug submissions in Canada and a comparison with the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency: Cross-sectional analysis
por: Lexchin, Joel
Publicado: (2023) -
Time to market for drugs approved in Canada between 2014 and 2018: an observational study
por: Lexchin, Joel
Publicado: (2021) -
US Food and Drug Administration regulatory updates in neuro-oncology
por: Mehta, Gautam U., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Health Canada's Proposal to Accelerate New Drug Reviews
por: Lexchin, Joel
Publicado: (2020)