Cargando…
Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions
BACKGROUND: The relationship between tongue pressure and masticatory performance during the mixed dentition period in cases of Class II malocclusion has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to determine differences in tongue pressure-related factors, including maxillofacial morphology and m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02956-x |
_version_ | 1784591918280212480 |
---|---|
author | Fujita, Yuko Ohno, Yoma Ohno, Keitaro Takeshima, Tomohiro Maki, Kenshi |
author_facet | Fujita, Yuko Ohno, Yoma Ohno, Keitaro Takeshima, Tomohiro Maki, Kenshi |
author_sort | Fujita, Yuko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The relationship between tongue pressure and masticatory performance during the mixed dentition period in cases of Class II malocclusion has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to determine differences in tongue pressure-related factors, including maxillofacial morphology and masticatory performance, between Class I and Class II malocclusions during the mixed dentition period. METHODS: A total of 56 children with Class I malocclusion (12 boys, 16 girls) or Class II malocclusion (16 boys, 12 girls) with mixed dentition were included in the present study. Height, body weight, hand grip strength, maximum occlusal force, maximum tongue pressure, masticatory performance, and the number of decayed, missing, and filled teeth were measured in all participants. Their lateral cephalograms were also evaluated. The means of all measurements were compared between Class I and Class II malocclusions. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to determine associations between maximum tongue pressure and other variables for each type of malocclusion. RESULTS: The maximum tongue pressure, hand grip strength, and maximum occlusal force in the Class II malocclusion group were significantly lower than those in the Class I malocclusion group (all, p < 0.05). The maximum tongue pressure was significantly positively correlated with hand grip strength, maximum occlusal force, masticatory performance, and SNB (sella, nasion, B point) angle in the Class I group (all, p < 0.05), and with height, body weight, and labial inclination of the central incisors in the Class II group (all, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The maxillofacial morphometric factors associated with tongue pressure were clearly different between cases of Class I and Class II malocclusion with mixed dentition. Masticatory performance and tongue pressure were significantly positively correlated in cases of Class I malocclusion, but not in cases of Class II malocclusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8555142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85551422021-10-29 Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions Fujita, Yuko Ohno, Yoma Ohno, Keitaro Takeshima, Tomohiro Maki, Kenshi BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: The relationship between tongue pressure and masticatory performance during the mixed dentition period in cases of Class II malocclusion has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to determine differences in tongue pressure-related factors, including maxillofacial morphology and masticatory performance, between Class I and Class II malocclusions during the mixed dentition period. METHODS: A total of 56 children with Class I malocclusion (12 boys, 16 girls) or Class II malocclusion (16 boys, 12 girls) with mixed dentition were included in the present study. Height, body weight, hand grip strength, maximum occlusal force, maximum tongue pressure, masticatory performance, and the number of decayed, missing, and filled teeth were measured in all participants. Their lateral cephalograms were also evaluated. The means of all measurements were compared between Class I and Class II malocclusions. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to determine associations between maximum tongue pressure and other variables for each type of malocclusion. RESULTS: The maximum tongue pressure, hand grip strength, and maximum occlusal force in the Class II malocclusion group were significantly lower than those in the Class I malocclusion group (all, p < 0.05). The maximum tongue pressure was significantly positively correlated with hand grip strength, maximum occlusal force, masticatory performance, and SNB (sella, nasion, B point) angle in the Class I group (all, p < 0.05), and with height, body weight, and labial inclination of the central incisors in the Class II group (all, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The maxillofacial morphometric factors associated with tongue pressure were clearly different between cases of Class I and Class II malocclusion with mixed dentition. Masticatory performance and tongue pressure were significantly positively correlated in cases of Class I malocclusion, but not in cases of Class II malocclusion. BioMed Central 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8555142/ /pubmed/34711201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02956-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Fujita, Yuko Ohno, Yoma Ohno, Keitaro Takeshima, Tomohiro Maki, Kenshi Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions |
title | Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions |
title_full | Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions |
title_fullStr | Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions |
title_short | Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions |
title_sort | differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class i and class ii malocclusions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02956-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujitayuko differencesinthefactorsassociatedwithtonguepressurebetweenchildrenwithclassiandclassiimalocclusions AT ohnoyoma differencesinthefactorsassociatedwithtonguepressurebetweenchildrenwithclassiandclassiimalocclusions AT ohnokeitaro differencesinthefactorsassociatedwithtonguepressurebetweenchildrenwithclassiandclassiimalocclusions AT takeshimatomohiro differencesinthefactorsassociatedwithtonguepressurebetweenchildrenwithclassiandclassiimalocclusions AT makikenshi differencesinthefactorsassociatedwithtonguepressurebetweenchildrenwithclassiandclassiimalocclusions |