Cargando…
Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study
BACKGROUND: The jigless knotless internal brace surgery (JKIB), a modified minimal invasive surgery (MIS) for acute Achilles tendon injury, has advantages of preventing sural-nerve injury in MIS and superficial wound infection in open surgery, as demonstrated in previous clinical research. However,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04809-1 |
_version_ | 1784591946760585216 |
---|---|
author | Ko, Po-Yen Hsu, Chieh-Hsiang Hong, Chih-Kai Hung, Ming-Tung Su, Wei-Ren Wu, Po-Ting Jou, I-Ming Su, Fong-Chin |
author_facet | Ko, Po-Yen Hsu, Chieh-Hsiang Hong, Chih-Kai Hung, Ming-Tung Su, Wei-Ren Wu, Po-Ting Jou, I-Ming Su, Fong-Chin |
author_sort | Ko, Po-Yen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The jigless knotless internal brace surgery (JKIB), a modified minimal invasive surgery (MIS) for acute Achilles tendon injury, has advantages of preventing sural-nerve injury in MIS and superficial wound infection in open surgery, as demonstrated in previous clinical research. However, to date, biomechanical testing has not yet been validated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty fresh porcine Achilles tendons were used to compare the JKIB with other open surgery techniques, the four-stranded Krackow suture (4sK) and the triple-bundle suture (TBS) in biomechanical testing with cyclic loading set at 1 Hz. This approach simulated a progressive rehabilitation protocol where 20-100 N was applied in the first 1000 cycles, followed by 20-190 N in the second 1000 cycles, and then 20-369 N in the third 1000 cycles. The cycles leading to repair gaps of 2 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm were recorded. The survival cycles were defined as repair gap of 10 mm. RESULTS: With respect to survival cycles, a significant difference was found among the three groups, in which the TBS was the most robust, followed by the JKIB and the 4sK, where the mean survived cycles were 2639.3 +/− 263.55, 2073.6 +/− 319.92, and 1425.25 +/− 268.96, respectively. Significant differences were verified via a post hoc analysis with the Mann–Whitney U test after the Bonferroni correction (p < 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The TBS was the strongest suture structure in acute Achilles tendon repair. However, the JKIB could be an option in acute Achilles tendon repair with the MIS technique due to it being more robust than the 4sK, which has been typically favored for use in open repair. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8555281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85552812021-10-29 Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study Ko, Po-Yen Hsu, Chieh-Hsiang Hong, Chih-Kai Hung, Ming-Tung Su, Wei-Ren Wu, Po-Ting Jou, I-Ming Su, Fong-Chin BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The jigless knotless internal brace surgery (JKIB), a modified minimal invasive surgery (MIS) for acute Achilles tendon injury, has advantages of preventing sural-nerve injury in MIS and superficial wound infection in open surgery, as demonstrated in previous clinical research. However, to date, biomechanical testing has not yet been validated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty fresh porcine Achilles tendons were used to compare the JKIB with other open surgery techniques, the four-stranded Krackow suture (4sK) and the triple-bundle suture (TBS) in biomechanical testing with cyclic loading set at 1 Hz. This approach simulated a progressive rehabilitation protocol where 20-100 N was applied in the first 1000 cycles, followed by 20-190 N in the second 1000 cycles, and then 20-369 N in the third 1000 cycles. The cycles leading to repair gaps of 2 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm were recorded. The survival cycles were defined as repair gap of 10 mm. RESULTS: With respect to survival cycles, a significant difference was found among the three groups, in which the TBS was the most robust, followed by the JKIB and the 4sK, where the mean survived cycles were 2639.3 +/− 263.55, 2073.6 +/− 319.92, and 1425.25 +/− 268.96, respectively. Significant differences were verified via a post hoc analysis with the Mann–Whitney U test after the Bonferroni correction (p < 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The TBS was the strongest suture structure in acute Achilles tendon repair. However, the JKIB could be an option in acute Achilles tendon repair with the MIS technique due to it being more robust than the 4sK, which has been typically favored for use in open repair. BioMed Central 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8555281/ /pubmed/34711221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04809-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ko, Po-Yen Hsu, Chieh-Hsiang Hong, Chih-Kai Hung, Ming-Tung Su, Wei-Ren Wu, Po-Ting Jou, I-Ming Su, Fong-Chin Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study |
title | Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study |
title_full | Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study |
title_fullStr | Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study |
title_short | Jigless knotless internal brace versus other open Achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study |
title_sort | jigless knotless internal brace versus other open achilles tendon repairs using a progressive rehabilitation protocol: a biomechanical study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04809-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kopoyen jiglessknotlessinternalbraceversusotheropenachillestendonrepairsusingaprogressiverehabilitationprotocolabiomechanicalstudy AT hsuchiehhsiang jiglessknotlessinternalbraceversusotheropenachillestendonrepairsusingaprogressiverehabilitationprotocolabiomechanicalstudy AT hongchihkai jiglessknotlessinternalbraceversusotheropenachillestendonrepairsusingaprogressiverehabilitationprotocolabiomechanicalstudy AT hungmingtung jiglessknotlessinternalbraceversusotheropenachillestendonrepairsusingaprogressiverehabilitationprotocolabiomechanicalstudy AT suweiren jiglessknotlessinternalbraceversusotheropenachillestendonrepairsusingaprogressiverehabilitationprotocolabiomechanicalstudy AT wupoting jiglessknotlessinternalbraceversusotheropenachillestendonrepairsusingaprogressiverehabilitationprotocolabiomechanicalstudy AT jouiming jiglessknotlessinternalbraceversusotheropenachillestendonrepairsusingaprogressiverehabilitationprotocolabiomechanicalstudy AT sufongchin jiglessknotlessinternalbraceversusotheropenachillestendonrepairsusingaprogressiverehabilitationprotocolabiomechanicalstudy |