Cargando…

The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: A Comparison Between the 2020 Match and 2021 Match

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic modified the Residency Match process for fourth-year medical students. In-person away rotations were discouraged, interviews were virtual, and traditional factors used to rank programs were absent. Here, we compare survey results administered to both the 2020 and 2021...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taparra, Kekoa, Ebner, Daniel K., Cruz, Denise De La, Holliday, Emma B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34729444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100842
_version_ 1784591959088693248
author Taparra, Kekoa
Ebner, Daniel K.
Cruz, Denise De La
Holliday, Emma B.
author_facet Taparra, Kekoa
Ebner, Daniel K.
Cruz, Denise De La
Holliday, Emma B.
author_sort Taparra, Kekoa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic modified the Residency Match process for fourth-year medical students. In-person away rotations were discouraged, interviews were virtual, and traditional factors used to rank programs were absent. Here, we compare survey results administered to both the 2020 and 2021 Match applicants to assess the influence of the pandemic on the radiation oncology (RO) Match process. METHODS: An institutional review board–approved prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. The 2020 and 2021 RO Match applicants at a large RO program were invited to participate. Descriptive summary statistics were assessed. RESULTS: The 2020 and 2021 Matches each had 76 applicants complete the survey with response rates of 54% and 57%, respectively. The 2 groups were predominantly white, cisgender male, single, and without children. Whereas 11% of 2020 applicants did not complete away rotations, 45% of 2021 applicants did not. For 2021 Match applicants, 65% of away rotations were performed virtually, whereas 51% were not for medical school credit. Of the applicants, 84% were satisfied with virtual interviews and 72% felt cost savings were worth not having in-person interviews. Whereas 49% of Match 2020 applicants spent >$5000 in interview costs, 0% of the Match 2021 applicants did so, with 45% spending <$100. Postinterview communications from programs increased during the pandemic from 36% to 42% in 2020 Match and 2021 Match, respectively. Although program culture was the most common factor influencing 2021 Match applicants program rankings, half of applicants did not gain a sense of program culture during virtual interviews. CONCLUSIONS: We found 2021 Match applicants completed fewer away rotations, were satisfied with virtual interviews/reduced costs, and did not gain a sense of program culture through virtual rotations/interviews despite it being the most important ranking factor reported. This study supports further exploration of virtual away rotations and virtual interviews moving forward beyond the pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8555343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85553432021-10-29 The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: A Comparison Between the 2020 Match and 2021 Match Taparra, Kekoa Ebner, Daniel K. Cruz, Denise De La Holliday, Emma B. Adv Radiat Oncol Research Letter PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic modified the Residency Match process for fourth-year medical students. In-person away rotations were discouraged, interviews were virtual, and traditional factors used to rank programs were absent. Here, we compare survey results administered to both the 2020 and 2021 Match applicants to assess the influence of the pandemic on the radiation oncology (RO) Match process. METHODS: An institutional review board–approved prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. The 2020 and 2021 RO Match applicants at a large RO program were invited to participate. Descriptive summary statistics were assessed. RESULTS: The 2020 and 2021 Matches each had 76 applicants complete the survey with response rates of 54% and 57%, respectively. The 2 groups were predominantly white, cisgender male, single, and without children. Whereas 11% of 2020 applicants did not complete away rotations, 45% of 2021 applicants did not. For 2021 Match applicants, 65% of away rotations were performed virtually, whereas 51% were not for medical school credit. Of the applicants, 84% were satisfied with virtual interviews and 72% felt cost savings were worth not having in-person interviews. Whereas 49% of Match 2020 applicants spent >$5000 in interview costs, 0% of the Match 2021 applicants did so, with 45% spending <$100. Postinterview communications from programs increased during the pandemic from 36% to 42% in 2020 Match and 2021 Match, respectively. Although program culture was the most common factor influencing 2021 Match applicants program rankings, half of applicants did not gain a sense of program culture during virtual interviews. CONCLUSIONS: We found 2021 Match applicants completed fewer away rotations, were satisfied with virtual interviews/reduced costs, and did not gain a sense of program culture through virtual rotations/interviews despite it being the most important ranking factor reported. This study supports further exploration of virtual away rotations and virtual interviews moving forward beyond the pandemic. Elsevier 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8555343/ /pubmed/34729444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100842 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Letter
Taparra, Kekoa
Ebner, Daniel K.
Cruz, Denise De La
Holliday, Emma B.
The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: A Comparison Between the 2020 Match and 2021 Match
title The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: A Comparison Between the 2020 Match and 2021 Match
title_full The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: A Comparison Between the 2020 Match and 2021 Match
title_fullStr The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: A Comparison Between the 2020 Match and 2021 Match
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: A Comparison Between the 2020 Match and 2021 Match
title_short The Impact of COVID-19 on Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: A Comparison Between the 2020 Match and 2021 Match
title_sort impact of covid-19 on radiation oncology residency applicant away rotations, interviews, and rank lists: a comparison between the 2020 match and 2021 match
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34729444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100842
work_keys_str_mv AT taparrakekoa theimpactofcovid19onradiationoncologyresidencyapplicantawayrotationsinterviewsandranklistsacomparisonbetweenthe2020matchand2021match
AT ebnerdanielk theimpactofcovid19onradiationoncologyresidencyapplicantawayrotationsinterviewsandranklistsacomparisonbetweenthe2020matchand2021match
AT cruzdenisedela theimpactofcovid19onradiationoncologyresidencyapplicantawayrotationsinterviewsandranklistsacomparisonbetweenthe2020matchand2021match
AT hollidayemmab theimpactofcovid19onradiationoncologyresidencyapplicantawayrotationsinterviewsandranklistsacomparisonbetweenthe2020matchand2021match
AT taparrakekoa impactofcovid19onradiationoncologyresidencyapplicantawayrotationsinterviewsandranklistsacomparisonbetweenthe2020matchand2021match
AT ebnerdanielk impactofcovid19onradiationoncologyresidencyapplicantawayrotationsinterviewsandranklistsacomparisonbetweenthe2020matchand2021match
AT cruzdenisedela impactofcovid19onradiationoncologyresidencyapplicantawayrotationsinterviewsandranklistsacomparisonbetweenthe2020matchand2021match
AT hollidayemmab impactofcovid19onradiationoncologyresidencyapplicantawayrotationsinterviewsandranklistsacomparisonbetweenthe2020matchand2021match