Cargando…

Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine

Following the detection of semicarbazide (SEM) in gelatine by Italian Authorities, at levels exceeding by three times the reference point for action (RPA) of 1 μg/kg, set out by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 for nitrofurans and their metabolites, the European Commission mandated EFSA to inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Keeffe, Michael, Christodoulidou, Anna, Nebbia, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34745360
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6881
_version_ 1784591981924581376
author O'Keeffe, Michael
Christodoulidou, Anna
Nebbia, Carlo
author_facet O'Keeffe, Michael
Christodoulidou, Anna
Nebbia, Carlo
collection PubMed
description Following the detection of semicarbazide (SEM) in gelatine by Italian Authorities, at levels exceeding by three times the reference point for action (RPA) of 1 μg/kg, set out by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 for nitrofurans and their metabolites, the European Commission mandated EFSA to investigate the available sources of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine. European Commission also asked EFSA to provide approaches that would distinguish SEM occurring due to illegal treatment with nitrofurazone from SEM produced during food processing. The literature indicates that SEM, both free and bound to macromolecules, could occur also in food products such as gelatine, during food processing, arising from the use of disinfecting agents and/or from reactions of various food components and, therefore, SEM cannot be considered as an unequivocal marker of the abuse of nitrofurazone in animal production. It is recommended to investigate in more detail which processing conditions lead to the formation of SEM in gelatine during its production and what levels can be found. One potential approach to distinguishing between SEM from nitrofurazone and SEM from other sources in food products, such as gelatine, might be based on determining the ratio of bound:free SEM in a sample of gelatine. However, whether the ratio of bound:free SEM would unequivocally distinguish between SEM arising from nitrofurazone abuse or from other sources still needs to be demonstrated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8555455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85554552021-11-05 Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine O'Keeffe, Michael Christodoulidou, Anna Nebbia, Carlo EFSA J Scientific Report Following the detection of semicarbazide (SEM) in gelatine by Italian Authorities, at levels exceeding by three times the reference point for action (RPA) of 1 μg/kg, set out by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 for nitrofurans and their metabolites, the European Commission mandated EFSA to investigate the available sources of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine. European Commission also asked EFSA to provide approaches that would distinguish SEM occurring due to illegal treatment with nitrofurazone from SEM produced during food processing. The literature indicates that SEM, both free and bound to macromolecules, could occur also in food products such as gelatine, during food processing, arising from the use of disinfecting agents and/or from reactions of various food components and, therefore, SEM cannot be considered as an unequivocal marker of the abuse of nitrofurazone in animal production. It is recommended to investigate in more detail which processing conditions lead to the formation of SEM in gelatine during its production and what levels can be found. One potential approach to distinguishing between SEM from nitrofurazone and SEM from other sources in food products, such as gelatine, might be based on determining the ratio of bound:free SEM in a sample of gelatine. However, whether the ratio of bound:free SEM would unequivocally distinguish between SEM arising from nitrofurazone abuse or from other sources still needs to be demonstrated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8555455/ /pubmed/34745360 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6881 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Report
O'Keeffe, Michael
Christodoulidou, Anna
Nebbia, Carlo
Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_full Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_fullStr Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_full_unstemmed Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_short Presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
title_sort presence of nitrofurans and their metabolites in gelatine
topic Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34745360
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6881
work_keys_str_mv AT presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine
AT okeeffemichael presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine
AT christodoulidouanna presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine
AT nebbiacarlo presenceofnitrofuransandtheirmetabolitesingelatine