Cargando…
Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to be a devastating pandemic. This study was aimed at performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG ELISAs, and investigation of their utility for pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145085 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_3806_20 |
_version_ | 1784592010998448128 |
---|---|
author | Kulkarni, Ruta Shrivastava, Shubham Patil, Harshad P. Kore, Pravin Rane, Prajakta Palkar, Sonali Lalwani, Sanjay Mishra, Akhilesh Chandra Arankalle, Vidya A. |
author_facet | Kulkarni, Ruta Shrivastava, Shubham Patil, Harshad P. Kore, Pravin Rane, Prajakta Palkar, Sonali Lalwani, Sanjay Mishra, Akhilesh Chandra Arankalle, Vidya A. |
author_sort | Kulkarni, Ruta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to be a devastating pandemic. This study was aimed at performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG ELISAs, and investigation of their utility for patient diagnosis and sero-epidemiologic investigations. METHODS: Serum/plasma samples from COVID-19 patients or asymptomatic contacts (n=180) and healthy donors (n=90) were tested in parallel using two commercial IgM ELISAs (Erbalisa and Inbios), and four IgG ELISAs (Kavach, Euroimmun, Erbalisa and Inbios) along with an indigenous β-propiolactone inactivated virus-based ELISA (IRSHA-IgG-ELISA). Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) was used as reference test. RESULTS: Among 180 COVID-19 patients, 125 tested positive by PRNT. Inbios-IgM-ELISA showed sensitivity (Se)/specificity (Sp)/positive predictive value (PPV)/negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.6/97.8/98.4/94.4 per cent in relation to PRNT, and performed better than Erbalisa-IgM-ELISA (Se: 48%, Sp: 95.6%, PPV: 95.2%, NPV: 65.2%). During the first week of disease, only 47.4 per cent of the COVID-19 patients tested IgM positive by Inbios-IgM-ELISA, detection improving at two weeks and beyond (~86-100%). Among IgG tests, Inbios-IgG-ELISA ranked first in terms of sensitivity (83.2%), followed by IRSHA (64.8%), Euroimmun (64%), Erbalisa (57.6%) and Kavach (56%) tests. For all IgG tests, sensitivity improved during the third (73.9-95.7%) and fourth week (100%) of illness. The specificity (96.7-100%) and PPV (96.2-100%) of all IgG tests were high; NPV ranged between 71.9 and 87.1 per cent with Inbios-IgG-ELISA scoring highest. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that IgM detection by the current, most sensitive ELISAs cannot replace molecular diagnosis, but may aid as a supplement test. The available IgG tests are suitable for serosurveys for the assessment of previous virus exposure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8555602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85556022021-11-09 Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test Kulkarni, Ruta Shrivastava, Shubham Patil, Harshad P. Kore, Pravin Rane, Prajakta Palkar, Sonali Lalwani, Sanjay Mishra, Akhilesh Chandra Arankalle, Vidya A. Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to be a devastating pandemic. This study was aimed at performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG ELISAs, and investigation of their utility for patient diagnosis and sero-epidemiologic investigations. METHODS: Serum/plasma samples from COVID-19 patients or asymptomatic contacts (n=180) and healthy donors (n=90) were tested in parallel using two commercial IgM ELISAs (Erbalisa and Inbios), and four IgG ELISAs (Kavach, Euroimmun, Erbalisa and Inbios) along with an indigenous β-propiolactone inactivated virus-based ELISA (IRSHA-IgG-ELISA). Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) was used as reference test. RESULTS: Among 180 COVID-19 patients, 125 tested positive by PRNT. Inbios-IgM-ELISA showed sensitivity (Se)/specificity (Sp)/positive predictive value (PPV)/negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.6/97.8/98.4/94.4 per cent in relation to PRNT, and performed better than Erbalisa-IgM-ELISA (Se: 48%, Sp: 95.6%, PPV: 95.2%, NPV: 65.2%). During the first week of disease, only 47.4 per cent of the COVID-19 patients tested IgM positive by Inbios-IgM-ELISA, detection improving at two weeks and beyond (~86-100%). Among IgG tests, Inbios-IgG-ELISA ranked first in terms of sensitivity (83.2%), followed by IRSHA (64.8%), Euroimmun (64%), Erbalisa (57.6%) and Kavach (56%) tests. For all IgG tests, sensitivity improved during the third (73.9-95.7%) and fourth week (100%) of illness. The specificity (96.7-100%) and PPV (96.2-100%) of all IgG tests were high; NPV ranged between 71.9 and 87.1 per cent with Inbios-IgG-ELISA scoring highest. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that IgM detection by the current, most sensitive ELISAs cannot replace molecular diagnosis, but may aid as a supplement test. The available IgG tests are suitable for serosurveys for the assessment of previous virus exposure. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8555602/ /pubmed/34145085 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_3806_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Medical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kulkarni, Ruta Shrivastava, Shubham Patil, Harshad P. Kore, Pravin Rane, Prajakta Palkar, Sonali Lalwani, Sanjay Mishra, Akhilesh Chandra Arankalle, Vidya A. Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test |
title | Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test |
title_full | Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test |
title_fullStr | Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test |
title_short | Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test |
title_sort | performance assessment of sars-cov-2 igm & igg elisas in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145085 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_3806_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kulkarniruta performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest AT shrivastavashubham performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest AT patilharshadp performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest AT korepravin performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest AT raneprajakta performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest AT palkarsonali performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest AT lalwanisanjay performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest AT mishraakhileshchandra performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest AT arankallevidyaa performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest |