Cargando…

Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to be a devastating pandemic. This study was aimed at performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG ELISAs, and investigation of their utility for pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulkarni, Ruta, Shrivastava, Shubham, Patil, Harshad P., Kore, Pravin, Rane, Prajakta, Palkar, Sonali, Lalwani, Sanjay, Mishra, Akhilesh Chandra, Arankalle, Vidya A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145085
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_3806_20
_version_ 1784592010998448128
author Kulkarni, Ruta
Shrivastava, Shubham
Patil, Harshad P.
Kore, Pravin
Rane, Prajakta
Palkar, Sonali
Lalwani, Sanjay
Mishra, Akhilesh Chandra
Arankalle, Vidya A.
author_facet Kulkarni, Ruta
Shrivastava, Shubham
Patil, Harshad P.
Kore, Pravin
Rane, Prajakta
Palkar, Sonali
Lalwani, Sanjay
Mishra, Akhilesh Chandra
Arankalle, Vidya A.
author_sort Kulkarni, Ruta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to be a devastating pandemic. This study was aimed at performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG ELISAs, and investigation of their utility for patient diagnosis and sero-epidemiologic investigations. METHODS: Serum/plasma samples from COVID-19 patients or asymptomatic contacts (n=180) and healthy donors (n=90) were tested in parallel using two commercial IgM ELISAs (Erbalisa and Inbios), and four IgG ELISAs (Kavach, Euroimmun, Erbalisa and Inbios) along with an indigenous β-propiolactone inactivated virus-based ELISA (IRSHA-IgG-ELISA). Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) was used as reference test. RESULTS: Among 180 COVID-19 patients, 125 tested positive by PRNT. Inbios-IgM-ELISA showed sensitivity (Se)/specificity (Sp)/positive predictive value (PPV)/negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.6/97.8/98.4/94.4 per cent in relation to PRNT, and performed better than Erbalisa-IgM-ELISA (Se: 48%, Sp: 95.6%, PPV: 95.2%, NPV: 65.2%). During the first week of disease, only 47.4 per cent of the COVID-19 patients tested IgM positive by Inbios-IgM-ELISA, detection improving at two weeks and beyond (~86-100%). Among IgG tests, Inbios-IgG-ELISA ranked first in terms of sensitivity (83.2%), followed by IRSHA (64.8%), Euroimmun (64%), Erbalisa (57.6%) and Kavach (56%) tests. For all IgG tests, sensitivity improved during the third (73.9-95.7%) and fourth week (100%) of illness. The specificity (96.7-100%) and PPV (96.2-100%) of all IgG tests were high; NPV ranged between 71.9 and 87.1 per cent with Inbios-IgG-ELISA scoring highest. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that IgM detection by the current, most sensitive ELISAs cannot replace molecular diagnosis, but may aid as a supplement test. The available IgG tests are suitable for serosurveys for the assessment of previous virus exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8555602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85556022021-11-09 Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test Kulkarni, Ruta Shrivastava, Shubham Patil, Harshad P. Kore, Pravin Rane, Prajakta Palkar, Sonali Lalwani, Sanjay Mishra, Akhilesh Chandra Arankalle, Vidya A. Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to be a devastating pandemic. This study was aimed at performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG ELISAs, and investigation of their utility for patient diagnosis and sero-epidemiologic investigations. METHODS: Serum/plasma samples from COVID-19 patients or asymptomatic contacts (n=180) and healthy donors (n=90) were tested in parallel using two commercial IgM ELISAs (Erbalisa and Inbios), and four IgG ELISAs (Kavach, Euroimmun, Erbalisa and Inbios) along with an indigenous β-propiolactone inactivated virus-based ELISA (IRSHA-IgG-ELISA). Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) was used as reference test. RESULTS: Among 180 COVID-19 patients, 125 tested positive by PRNT. Inbios-IgM-ELISA showed sensitivity (Se)/specificity (Sp)/positive predictive value (PPV)/negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.6/97.8/98.4/94.4 per cent in relation to PRNT, and performed better than Erbalisa-IgM-ELISA (Se: 48%, Sp: 95.6%, PPV: 95.2%, NPV: 65.2%). During the first week of disease, only 47.4 per cent of the COVID-19 patients tested IgM positive by Inbios-IgM-ELISA, detection improving at two weeks and beyond (~86-100%). Among IgG tests, Inbios-IgG-ELISA ranked first in terms of sensitivity (83.2%), followed by IRSHA (64.8%), Euroimmun (64%), Erbalisa (57.6%) and Kavach (56%) tests. For all IgG tests, sensitivity improved during the third (73.9-95.7%) and fourth week (100%) of illness. The specificity (96.7-100%) and PPV (96.2-100%) of all IgG tests were high; NPV ranged between 71.9 and 87.1 per cent with Inbios-IgG-ELISA scoring highest. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that IgM detection by the current, most sensitive ELISAs cannot replace molecular diagnosis, but may aid as a supplement test. The available IgG tests are suitable for serosurveys for the assessment of previous virus exposure. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8555602/ /pubmed/34145085 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_3806_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Medical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kulkarni, Ruta
Shrivastava, Shubham
Patil, Harshad P.
Kore, Pravin
Rane, Prajakta
Palkar, Sonali
Lalwani, Sanjay
Mishra, Akhilesh Chandra
Arankalle, Vidya A.
Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test
title Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test
title_full Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test
title_fullStr Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test
title_full_unstemmed Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test
title_short Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test
title_sort performance assessment of sars-cov-2 igm & igg elisas in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145085
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_3806_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kulkarniruta performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest
AT shrivastavashubham performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest
AT patilharshadp performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest
AT korepravin performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest
AT raneprajakta performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest
AT palkarsonali performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest
AT lalwanisanjay performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest
AT mishraakhileshchandra performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest
AT arankallevidyaa performanceassessmentofsarscov2igmiggelisasincomparisonwithplaquereductionneutralizationtest