Cargando…

Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Rest and Different Walking Conditions in Overweight or Obese Young Adults

Aims: To investigate the accuracy of FreeStyle Libre(TM) flash glucose monitoring (FGM) relevant to plasma glucose (PG) measurements during postprandial rest and different walking conditions in overweight/obese young adults. Methods: Data of 40 overweight/obese participants from two randomized cross...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiaoyuan, Sun, Fenghua, Wongpipit, Waris, Huang, Wendy Y. J., Wong, Stephen H. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.732751
_version_ 1784592023673634816
author Zhang, Xiaoyuan
Sun, Fenghua
Wongpipit, Waris
Huang, Wendy Y. J.
Wong, Stephen H. S.
author_facet Zhang, Xiaoyuan
Sun, Fenghua
Wongpipit, Waris
Huang, Wendy Y. J.
Wong, Stephen H. S.
author_sort Zhang, Xiaoyuan
collection PubMed
description Aims: To investigate the accuracy of FreeStyle Libre(TM) flash glucose monitoring (FGM) relevant to plasma glucose (PG) measurements during postprandial rest and different walking conditions in overweight/obese young adults. Methods: Data of 40 overweight/obese participants from two randomized crossover studies were pooled into four trials: (1) sitting (SIT, n = 40); (2) walking continuously for 30 min initiated 20 min before individual postprandial glucose peak (PPGP) (20iP + CONT, n = 40); (3) walking continuously for 30 min initiated at PPGP (iP + CONT, n = 20); and (4) accumulated walking for 30 min initiated 20 min before PPGP (20iP + ACCU, n = 20). Paired FGM and PG were measured 4 h following breakfast. Results: The overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between PG and FGM readings was 16.4 ± 8.6% for SIT, 16.2 ± 4.7% for 20iP + CONT, 16.7 ± 12.2% for iP + CONT, and 19.1 ± 6.8% for 20iP + ACCU. The Bland–Altman analysis showed a bias of −1.03 mmol⋅L(–1) in SIT, −0.89 mmol⋅L(–1) in 20iP + CONT, −0.82 mmol⋅L(–1) in iP + CONT, and −1.23 mmol⋅L(–1) in 20iP + ACCU. The Clarke error grid analysis showed that 99.6–100% of the values in all trials fell within zones A and B. Conclusion: Although FGM readings underestimated PG, the FGM accuracy was overall clinically acceptable during postprandial rest and walking in overweight/obese young adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8555657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85556572021-10-30 Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Rest and Different Walking Conditions in Overweight or Obese Young Adults Zhang, Xiaoyuan Sun, Fenghua Wongpipit, Waris Huang, Wendy Y. J. Wong, Stephen H. S. Front Physiol Physiology Aims: To investigate the accuracy of FreeStyle Libre(TM) flash glucose monitoring (FGM) relevant to plasma glucose (PG) measurements during postprandial rest and different walking conditions in overweight/obese young adults. Methods: Data of 40 overweight/obese participants from two randomized crossover studies were pooled into four trials: (1) sitting (SIT, n = 40); (2) walking continuously for 30 min initiated 20 min before individual postprandial glucose peak (PPGP) (20iP + CONT, n = 40); (3) walking continuously for 30 min initiated at PPGP (iP + CONT, n = 20); and (4) accumulated walking for 30 min initiated 20 min before PPGP (20iP + ACCU, n = 20). Paired FGM and PG were measured 4 h following breakfast. Results: The overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between PG and FGM readings was 16.4 ± 8.6% for SIT, 16.2 ± 4.7% for 20iP + CONT, 16.7 ± 12.2% for iP + CONT, and 19.1 ± 6.8% for 20iP + ACCU. The Bland–Altman analysis showed a bias of −1.03 mmol⋅L(–1) in SIT, −0.89 mmol⋅L(–1) in 20iP + CONT, −0.82 mmol⋅L(–1) in iP + CONT, and −1.23 mmol⋅L(–1) in 20iP + ACCU. The Clarke error grid analysis showed that 99.6–100% of the values in all trials fell within zones A and B. Conclusion: Although FGM readings underestimated PG, the FGM accuracy was overall clinically acceptable during postprandial rest and walking in overweight/obese young adults. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8555657/ /pubmed/34721064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.732751 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Sun, Wongpipit, Huang and Wong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Zhang, Xiaoyuan
Sun, Fenghua
Wongpipit, Waris
Huang, Wendy Y. J.
Wong, Stephen H. S.
Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Rest and Different Walking Conditions in Overweight or Obese Young Adults
title Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Rest and Different Walking Conditions in Overweight or Obese Young Adults
title_full Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Rest and Different Walking Conditions in Overweight or Obese Young Adults
title_fullStr Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Rest and Different Walking Conditions in Overweight or Obese Young Adults
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Rest and Different Walking Conditions in Overweight or Obese Young Adults
title_short Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Rest and Different Walking Conditions in Overweight or Obese Young Adults
title_sort accuracy of flash glucose monitoring during postprandial rest and different walking conditions in overweight or obese young adults
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.732751
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiaoyuan accuracyofflashglucosemonitoringduringpostprandialrestanddifferentwalkingconditionsinoverweightorobeseyoungadults
AT sunfenghua accuracyofflashglucosemonitoringduringpostprandialrestanddifferentwalkingconditionsinoverweightorobeseyoungadults
AT wongpipitwaris accuracyofflashglucosemonitoringduringpostprandialrestanddifferentwalkingconditionsinoverweightorobeseyoungadults
AT huangwendyyj accuracyofflashglucosemonitoringduringpostprandialrestanddifferentwalkingconditionsinoverweightorobeseyoungadults
AT wongstephenhs accuracyofflashglucosemonitoringduringpostprandialrestanddifferentwalkingconditionsinoverweightorobeseyoungadults