Cargando…

Assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: While patients and families struggling with atopic dermatitis (AD) have documented concerns for a contributory role of skin care products in AD pathology, nearly all the skin microbiome studies to date have asked participants to avoid topical products (such as soaps or select medications...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castillo, C. R., Alishahedani, M. E., Gough, P., Chaudhary, P. P., Yadav, M., Matriz, J., Myles, I. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.41
_version_ 1784592041086287872
author Castillo, C. R.
Alishahedani, M. E.
Gough, P.
Chaudhary, P. P.
Yadav, M.
Matriz, J.
Myles, I. A.
author_facet Castillo, C. R.
Alishahedani, M. E.
Gough, P.
Chaudhary, P. P.
Yadav, M.
Matriz, J.
Myles, I. A.
author_sort Castillo, C. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While patients and families struggling with atopic dermatitis (AD) have documented concerns for a contributory role of skin care products in AD pathology, nearly all the skin microbiome studies to date have asked participants to avoid topical products (such as soaps or select medications) for the preceding days to weeks prior to sample collection. Thus, given the established role of the microbiome in AD, the interactions between topical exposures, dysbiosis and AD remains underrepresented in the academic literature. OBJECTIVES: To address this knowledge gap, we expanded our previous evaluations to test the toxicological effects of a broader range of common chemicals, AD treatment lotions, creams and ointments using both health‐ and AD‐associated strains of Roseomonas mucosa and Staphylococcus spp. METHODS: Use of in vitro culture techniques and mouse models were deployed to identify chemicals with dysbiotic or pre‐biotic potential. A proof‐of‐concept study was subsequently performed in healthy volunteers to assess global microbiome shifts after exposure to select chemicals using dermatologic patch testing. RESULTS: Numerous chemicals possessed antibiotic properties, including many not marketed as anti‐microbials. Through targeted combination of potentially beneficial chemicals, we identified combinations which promoted the growth of health‐associated isolates over disease‐associated strains in bacterial culture and enhanced microbe‐specific outcomes in an established mouse model of AD; the most promising of which was the combination of citral and colophonium (often sold as lemon myrtle oil and pine tar). Additional studies would likely further optimize the combination of ingredients use. Similar results were seen in the proof‐of‐concept human studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results could offer a systematic, multiplex approach to identify which products carry dysbiotic potential and thus may guide formulation of new topicals to benefit patients with AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8555759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85557592021-10-29 Assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis Castillo, C. R. Alishahedani, M. E. Gough, P. Chaudhary, P. P. Yadav, M. Matriz, J. Myles, I. A. Skin Health Dis Original Articles BACKGROUND: While patients and families struggling with atopic dermatitis (AD) have documented concerns for a contributory role of skin care products in AD pathology, nearly all the skin microbiome studies to date have asked participants to avoid topical products (such as soaps or select medications) for the preceding days to weeks prior to sample collection. Thus, given the established role of the microbiome in AD, the interactions between topical exposures, dysbiosis and AD remains underrepresented in the academic literature. OBJECTIVES: To address this knowledge gap, we expanded our previous evaluations to test the toxicological effects of a broader range of common chemicals, AD treatment lotions, creams and ointments using both health‐ and AD‐associated strains of Roseomonas mucosa and Staphylococcus spp. METHODS: Use of in vitro culture techniques and mouse models were deployed to identify chemicals with dysbiotic or pre‐biotic potential. A proof‐of‐concept study was subsequently performed in healthy volunteers to assess global microbiome shifts after exposure to select chemicals using dermatologic patch testing. RESULTS: Numerous chemicals possessed antibiotic properties, including many not marketed as anti‐microbials. Through targeted combination of potentially beneficial chemicals, we identified combinations which promoted the growth of health‐associated isolates over disease‐associated strains in bacterial culture and enhanced microbe‐specific outcomes in an established mouse model of AD; the most promising of which was the combination of citral and colophonium (often sold as lemon myrtle oil and pine tar). Additional studies would likely further optimize the combination of ingredients use. Similar results were seen in the proof‐of‐concept human studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results could offer a systematic, multiplex approach to identify which products carry dysbiotic potential and thus may guide formulation of new topicals to benefit patients with AD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8555759/ /pubmed/34723253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.41 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Castillo, C. R.
Alishahedani, M. E.
Gough, P.
Chaudhary, P. P.
Yadav, M.
Matriz, J.
Myles, I. A.
Assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis
title Assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis
title_full Assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis
title_fullStr Assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis
title_short Assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis
title_sort assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.41
work_keys_str_mv AT castillocr assessingtheeffectsofcommontopicalexposuresonskinbacteriaassociatedwithatopicdermatitis
AT alishahedanime assessingtheeffectsofcommontopicalexposuresonskinbacteriaassociatedwithatopicdermatitis
AT goughp assessingtheeffectsofcommontopicalexposuresonskinbacteriaassociatedwithatopicdermatitis
AT chaudharypp assessingtheeffectsofcommontopicalexposuresonskinbacteriaassociatedwithatopicdermatitis
AT yadavm assessingtheeffectsofcommontopicalexposuresonskinbacteriaassociatedwithatopicdermatitis
AT matrizj assessingtheeffectsofcommontopicalexposuresonskinbacteriaassociatedwithatopicdermatitis
AT mylesia assessingtheeffectsofcommontopicalexposuresonskinbacteriaassociatedwithatopicdermatitis