Cargando…

EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a FNA needle

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) involves puncture with a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle, followed by tract dilation involving exchange of multiple accessories, and finally deployment of stent. The procedure is time consuming and carr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rai, Praveer, Harish, KC, Majeed, Abdul, Goel, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677161
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_132_21
_version_ 1784592043020910592
author Rai, Praveer
Harish, KC
Majeed, Abdul
Goel, Amit
author_facet Rai, Praveer
Harish, KC
Majeed, Abdul
Goel, Amit
author_sort Rai, Praveer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) involves puncture with a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle, followed by tract dilation involving exchange of multiple accessories, and finally deployment of stent. The procedure is time consuming and carries a risk of loss of wire access and hence technical failure. We used a modified technique with a 10-F cystotome alone instead of a FNA needle and dilators. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed records of consecutive patients who had undergone EUS-guided drainage of PFC using a modified technique, with puncture of PFC using a 10-Fcystotome, followed by passage of a guidewire through it into the PFC cavity and deployment of a biflanged, 2-cm-long, fully covered self-expanding metal stent over it. Technical and clinical success rates and procedure time were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent PFC drainage, median age was 35 (12–76), and 35 (77.8%) were males. The median (range) duration of symptoms was 125 (38–1080) days, while the median PFC size was 11.8 × 11 × 11 cm, and the follow-up period after stent removal was 111 ± 72 (18–251) weeks. The procedure took 10 (8–12) min and had technical and clinical success rates of 100 and 97.8%, respectively. Minor complications occurred in six (13.3%) patients, while recurrence occurred in one. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided drainage of PFC using a cystotome is a quick, effective and safe procedure. It may also be less expensive since it obviates the use of FNA needles and dilators, and is likely to be a useful alternative to the conventional technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8555769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85557692021-11-09 EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a FNA needle Rai, Praveer Harish, KC Majeed, Abdul Goel, Amit Saudi J Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) involves puncture with a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle, followed by tract dilation involving exchange of multiple accessories, and finally deployment of stent. The procedure is time consuming and carries a risk of loss of wire access and hence technical failure. We used a modified technique with a 10-F cystotome alone instead of a FNA needle and dilators. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed records of consecutive patients who had undergone EUS-guided drainage of PFC using a modified technique, with puncture of PFC using a 10-Fcystotome, followed by passage of a guidewire through it into the PFC cavity and deployment of a biflanged, 2-cm-long, fully covered self-expanding metal stent over it. Technical and clinical success rates and procedure time were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent PFC drainage, median age was 35 (12–76), and 35 (77.8%) were males. The median (range) duration of symptoms was 125 (38–1080) days, while the median PFC size was 11.8 × 11 × 11 cm, and the follow-up period after stent removal was 111 ± 72 (18–251) weeks. The procedure took 10 (8–12) min and had technical and clinical success rates of 100 and 97.8%, respectively. Minor complications occurred in six (13.3%) patients, while recurrence occurred in one. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided drainage of PFC using a cystotome is a quick, effective and safe procedure. It may also be less expensive since it obviates the use of FNA needles and dilators, and is likely to be a useful alternative to the conventional technique. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8555769/ /pubmed/34677161 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_132_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rai, Praveer
Harish, KC
Majeed, Abdul
Goel, Amit
EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a FNA needle
title EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a FNA needle
title_full EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a FNA needle
title_fullStr EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a FNA needle
title_full_unstemmed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a FNA needle
title_short EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a FNA needle
title_sort eus-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a fna needle
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677161
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_132_21
work_keys_str_mv AT raipraveer eusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionusingamodifiedtechniqueofcystotomealonewithoutafnaneedle
AT harishkc eusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionusingamodifiedtechniqueofcystotomealonewithoutafnaneedle
AT majeedabdul eusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionusingamodifiedtechniqueofcystotomealonewithoutafnaneedle
AT goelamit eusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionusingamodifiedtechniqueofcystotomealonewithoutafnaneedle