Cargando…
Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method in acute COVID-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis
INTRODUCTION: As in other viral infections, anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) are observed in SARS-CoV-2 infection. We investigated the presence of autoantibodies in acute COVID-19 and the association with early laboratory findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 50 sera (>18 years, 25 Female) f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2021.113174 |
_version_ | 1784592108587319296 |
---|---|
author | Peker, Bilal Olcay Şener, Aslı Gamze Kaptan Aydoğmuş, Figen |
author_facet | Peker, Bilal Olcay Şener, Aslı Gamze Kaptan Aydoğmuş, Figen |
author_sort | Peker, Bilal Olcay |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: As in other viral infections, anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) are observed in SARS-CoV-2 infection. We investigated the presence of autoantibodies in acute COVID-19 and the association with early laboratory findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 50 sera (>18 years, 25 Female) from patients with acute COVID-19. ANAs (HEp-20-10 liver biochip), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA, Europlus Granulocyte Mosaic 32) and anti-double stranded DNA were investigated with product of Euroimmune AG (Luebeck, Germany) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method. Also, antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) was examined by a chemiluminisens assay (Euroimmun AG, Luebeck, Germany). Samples from 50 blood bank donors collected before the COVID-19 pandemic were used as controls. RESULTS: The IIF-ANA test was positive in 18% (N = 9/50) of the patients. The median time of sample collection was 7 days (range: 1–28 days) after diagnosis. ANA was positive in only one (2%) control sample. Five (55.5%) patients were ANA positive with a strong titer (3+). There was no relationship between antibody titration and time of sample collection (p = 0,55). Anti-CCP was detected in a nucleolar (3+) positive patient (2%). ANA was detected in 14.28% (N = 1/7, rods-rings (±), p = 0,78) of patients in the intensive care unit(ICU). Patients treated in the clinic have more and higher titers of ANA, mostly in nucleolar patterns, than ICU patients. CONCLUSIONS: The variety of antibodies detected in acute COVID-19 and the uncertainty of how long they persist can lead to confusion, especially in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases for IIF-ANA testing in immunology laboratories. Improvements in cell lines and methods will facilitate the diagnostic process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8556075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85560752021-11-01 Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method in acute COVID-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis Peker, Bilal Olcay Şener, Aslı Gamze Kaptan Aydoğmuş, Figen J Immunol Methods Article INTRODUCTION: As in other viral infections, anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) are observed in SARS-CoV-2 infection. We investigated the presence of autoantibodies in acute COVID-19 and the association with early laboratory findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 50 sera (>18 years, 25 Female) from patients with acute COVID-19. ANAs (HEp-20-10 liver biochip), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA, Europlus Granulocyte Mosaic 32) and anti-double stranded DNA were investigated with product of Euroimmune AG (Luebeck, Germany) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method. Also, antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) was examined by a chemiluminisens assay (Euroimmun AG, Luebeck, Germany). Samples from 50 blood bank donors collected before the COVID-19 pandemic were used as controls. RESULTS: The IIF-ANA test was positive in 18% (N = 9/50) of the patients. The median time of sample collection was 7 days (range: 1–28 days) after diagnosis. ANA was positive in only one (2%) control sample. Five (55.5%) patients were ANA positive with a strong titer (3+). There was no relationship between antibody titration and time of sample collection (p = 0,55). Anti-CCP was detected in a nucleolar (3+) positive patient (2%). ANA was detected in 14.28% (N = 1/7, rods-rings (±), p = 0,78) of patients in the intensive care unit(ICU). Patients treated in the clinic have more and higher titers of ANA, mostly in nucleolar patterns, than ICU patients. CONCLUSIONS: The variety of antibodies detected in acute COVID-19 and the uncertainty of how long they persist can lead to confusion, especially in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases for IIF-ANA testing in immunology laboratories. Improvements in cell lines and methods will facilitate the diagnostic process. Elsevier B.V. 2021-12 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8556075/ /pubmed/34737165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2021.113174 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Peker, Bilal Olcay Şener, Aslı Gamze Kaptan Aydoğmuş, Figen Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method in acute COVID-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis |
title | Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method in acute COVID-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis |
title_full | Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method in acute COVID-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method in acute COVID-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method in acute COVID-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis |
title_short | Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method in acute COVID-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis |
title_sort | antinuclear antibodies (anas) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (iif) method in acute covid-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2021.113174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pekerbilalolcay antinuclearantibodiesanasdetectedbyindirectimmunofluorescenceiifmethodinacutecovid19infectionfutureroadmapforlaboratorydiagnosis AT seneraslıgamze antinuclearantibodiesanasdetectedbyindirectimmunofluorescenceiifmethodinacutecovid19infectionfutureroadmapforlaboratorydiagnosis AT kaptanaydogmusfigen antinuclearantibodiesanasdetectedbyindirectimmunofluorescenceiifmethodinacutecovid19infectionfutureroadmapforlaboratorydiagnosis |