Cargando…

Evaluating Thresholds to Adopt Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiotherapy as Standard of Care in Sarcoma

INTRODUCTION: Data supporting hypofractionated preoperative radiation therapy (RT) for patients with extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are currently limited to phase II single-institution studies. We sought to understand the type and thresholds of clinical evidence required for experts t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valle, Luca F., Bernthal, Nicholas, Eilber, Fritz C., Shabason, Jacob E., Bedi, Meena, Kalbasi, Anusha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3735874
_version_ 1784592118136700928
author Valle, Luca F.
Bernthal, Nicholas
Eilber, Fritz C.
Shabason, Jacob E.
Bedi, Meena
Kalbasi, Anusha
author_facet Valle, Luca F.
Bernthal, Nicholas
Eilber, Fritz C.
Shabason, Jacob E.
Bedi, Meena
Kalbasi, Anusha
author_sort Valle, Luca F.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Data supporting hypofractionated preoperative radiation therapy (RT) for patients with extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are currently limited to phase II single-institution studies. We sought to understand the type and thresholds of clinical evidence required for experts to adopt hypofractionated RT as a standard-of-care option for patients with STS. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to multidisciplinary sarcoma experts. The survey queried whether data from a theoretical, multi-institutional, phase II study of 5-fraction preoperative RT could change practice. Using endpoints from RTOG 0630 as a reference, the survey also queried thresholds for acceptable local control, wound complication, and late toxicity for the study protocol to be accepted as a standard-of-care option. Responses were logged from 8/27/2020 to 9/8/2020 and summarized graphically. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 55.3% (47/85). Local control is the most important clinical outcome for sarcoma specialists when evaluating whether an RT regimen should be considered standard of care. 17% (8/47) of providers require randomized phase III evidence to consider hypofractionated preoperative RT as a standard-of-care option, whereas 10.6% (5/47) of providers already view this as a standard-of-care option. Of providers willing to change practice based on phase II data, most (78%, 29/37) would accept local control rates equivalent to or less than those in RTOG 0630, as long as the rate was higher than 85%. However, 51.3% (19/37) would require wound complication rates superior to those reported in RTOG 0630, and 46% (17/37) of respondents would accept late toxicity rates inferior to RTOG 0630. CONCLUSION: Consensus building is needed among clinicians regarding the type and threshold of evidence needed to evaluate hypofractionated RT as a standard-of-care option. A collaborative consortium-based approach may be the most pragmatic means for developing consensus protocols and pooling data to gradually introduce hypofractionated preoperative RT into routine practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8556117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85561172021-10-30 Evaluating Thresholds to Adopt Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiotherapy as Standard of Care in Sarcoma Valle, Luca F. Bernthal, Nicholas Eilber, Fritz C. Shabason, Jacob E. Bedi, Meena Kalbasi, Anusha Sarcoma Research Article INTRODUCTION: Data supporting hypofractionated preoperative radiation therapy (RT) for patients with extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are currently limited to phase II single-institution studies. We sought to understand the type and thresholds of clinical evidence required for experts to adopt hypofractionated RT as a standard-of-care option for patients with STS. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to multidisciplinary sarcoma experts. The survey queried whether data from a theoretical, multi-institutional, phase II study of 5-fraction preoperative RT could change practice. Using endpoints from RTOG 0630 as a reference, the survey also queried thresholds for acceptable local control, wound complication, and late toxicity for the study protocol to be accepted as a standard-of-care option. Responses were logged from 8/27/2020 to 9/8/2020 and summarized graphically. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 55.3% (47/85). Local control is the most important clinical outcome for sarcoma specialists when evaluating whether an RT regimen should be considered standard of care. 17% (8/47) of providers require randomized phase III evidence to consider hypofractionated preoperative RT as a standard-of-care option, whereas 10.6% (5/47) of providers already view this as a standard-of-care option. Of providers willing to change practice based on phase II data, most (78%, 29/37) would accept local control rates equivalent to or less than those in RTOG 0630, as long as the rate was higher than 85%. However, 51.3% (19/37) would require wound complication rates superior to those reported in RTOG 0630, and 46% (17/37) of respondents would accept late toxicity rates inferior to RTOG 0630. CONCLUSION: Consensus building is needed among clinicians regarding the type and threshold of evidence needed to evaluate hypofractionated RT as a standard-of-care option. A collaborative consortium-based approach may be the most pragmatic means for developing consensus protocols and pooling data to gradually introduce hypofractionated preoperative RT into routine practice. Hindawi 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8556117/ /pubmed/34720663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3735874 Text en Copyright © 2021 Luca F. Valle et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Valle, Luca F.
Bernthal, Nicholas
Eilber, Fritz C.
Shabason, Jacob E.
Bedi, Meena
Kalbasi, Anusha
Evaluating Thresholds to Adopt Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiotherapy as Standard of Care in Sarcoma
title Evaluating Thresholds to Adopt Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiotherapy as Standard of Care in Sarcoma
title_full Evaluating Thresholds to Adopt Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiotherapy as Standard of Care in Sarcoma
title_fullStr Evaluating Thresholds to Adopt Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiotherapy as Standard of Care in Sarcoma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Thresholds to Adopt Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiotherapy as Standard of Care in Sarcoma
title_short Evaluating Thresholds to Adopt Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiotherapy as Standard of Care in Sarcoma
title_sort evaluating thresholds to adopt hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy as standard of care in sarcoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3735874
work_keys_str_mv AT vallelucaf evaluatingthresholdstoadopthypofractionatedpreoperativeradiotherapyasstandardofcareinsarcoma
AT bernthalnicholas evaluatingthresholdstoadopthypofractionatedpreoperativeradiotherapyasstandardofcareinsarcoma
AT eilberfritzc evaluatingthresholdstoadopthypofractionatedpreoperativeradiotherapyasstandardofcareinsarcoma
AT shabasonjacobe evaluatingthresholdstoadopthypofractionatedpreoperativeradiotherapyasstandardofcareinsarcoma
AT bedimeena evaluatingthresholdstoadopthypofractionatedpreoperativeradiotherapyasstandardofcareinsarcoma
AT kalbasianusha evaluatingthresholdstoadopthypofractionatedpreoperativeradiotherapyasstandardofcareinsarcoma