Cargando…

Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers

BACKGROUND: Trainees learn transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) interpretation through independently completing and reviewing selected portions of the study with experts. The diagnostic accuracy of novice TTE interpretation is known to be low and schema for reading TTEs systematically are lacking. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, David Roy, Blissett, Sarah, O’Sullivan, Patricia, Qasim, Atif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12574-021-00531-y
_version_ 1784592128675938304
author Anderson, David Roy
Blissett, Sarah
O’Sullivan, Patricia
Qasim, Atif
author_facet Anderson, David Roy
Blissett, Sarah
O’Sullivan, Patricia
Qasim, Atif
author_sort Anderson, David Roy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Trainees learn transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) interpretation through independently completing and reviewing selected portions of the study with experts. The diagnostic accuracy of novice TTE interpretation is known to be low and schema for reading TTEs systematically are lacking. The purpose of our study is to identify techniques experts use while reading TTEs which could be used to more effectively teach novice readers. METHODS: We performed a prospective qualitative case study to observe how experts and trainees interpret TTEs in an academic institution using a concurrent think aloud (CTA) method. Three TTEs of intermediate complexity were given to 3 advanced imaging fellows, 3 first year fellows and 3 expert TTE readers Participants filled out a report while reading and described aloud their thought processes. Sessions were video and audiotaped for analysis. RESULTS: Experts and advanced fellows used specific techniques that novices did not including: previewing studies, reviewing multiple images simultaneously, having flexibility in image review order and disease coding, and saving hardest elements to code for the end. Direct observation of TTE reading informed trainee inefficiencies and was a well-received educational tool. CONCLUSIONS: In this single centered study we identified several unique approaches experts use to interpret TTEs which may be teachable to novices. Although limited in generalizability the findings of this study suggests that a more systematic approach to TTE interpretation, using techniques found in experts, might be of significant value for trainees. Further study is needed to evaluate teaching practices at other institutions and to assess whether implementation of these techniques by novices improves can improve their diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of reading at an earlier stage in their training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8556165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85561652021-11-04 Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers Anderson, David Roy Blissett, Sarah O’Sullivan, Patricia Qasim, Atif J Echocardiogr Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Trainees learn transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) interpretation through independently completing and reviewing selected portions of the study with experts. The diagnostic accuracy of novice TTE interpretation is known to be low and schema for reading TTEs systematically are lacking. The purpose of our study is to identify techniques experts use while reading TTEs which could be used to more effectively teach novice readers. METHODS: We performed a prospective qualitative case study to observe how experts and trainees interpret TTEs in an academic institution using a concurrent think aloud (CTA) method. Three TTEs of intermediate complexity were given to 3 advanced imaging fellows, 3 first year fellows and 3 expert TTE readers Participants filled out a report while reading and described aloud their thought processes. Sessions were video and audiotaped for analysis. RESULTS: Experts and advanced fellows used specific techniques that novices did not including: previewing studies, reviewing multiple images simultaneously, having flexibility in image review order and disease coding, and saving hardest elements to code for the end. Direct observation of TTE reading informed trainee inefficiencies and was a well-received educational tool. CONCLUSIONS: In this single centered study we identified several unique approaches experts use to interpret TTEs which may be teachable to novices. Although limited in generalizability the findings of this study suggests that a more systematic approach to TTE interpretation, using techniques found in experts, might be of significant value for trainees. Further study is needed to evaluate teaching practices at other institutions and to assess whether implementation of these techniques by novices improves can improve their diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of reading at an earlier stage in their training. Springer Singapore 2021-05-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8556165/ /pubmed/34050902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12574-021-00531-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Anderson, David Roy
Blissett, Sarah
O’Sullivan, Patricia
Qasim, Atif
Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers
title Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers
title_full Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers
title_fullStr Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers
title_full_unstemmed Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers
title_short Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers
title_sort differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12574-021-00531-y
work_keys_str_mv AT andersondavidroy differencesinechocardiographyinterpretationtechniquesamongtraineesandexpertreaders
AT blissettsarah differencesinechocardiographyinterpretationtechniquesamongtraineesandexpertreaders
AT osullivanpatricia differencesinechocardiographyinterpretationtechniquesamongtraineesandexpertreaders
AT qasimatif differencesinechocardiographyinterpretationtechniquesamongtraineesandexpertreaders