Cargando…
Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers
BACKGROUND: Trainees learn transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) interpretation through independently completing and reviewing selected portions of the study with experts. The diagnostic accuracy of novice TTE interpretation is known to be low and schema for reading TTEs systematically are lacking. The...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12574-021-00531-y |
_version_ | 1784592128675938304 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, David Roy Blissett, Sarah O’Sullivan, Patricia Qasim, Atif |
author_facet | Anderson, David Roy Blissett, Sarah O’Sullivan, Patricia Qasim, Atif |
author_sort | Anderson, David Roy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trainees learn transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) interpretation through independently completing and reviewing selected portions of the study with experts. The diagnostic accuracy of novice TTE interpretation is known to be low and schema for reading TTEs systematically are lacking. The purpose of our study is to identify techniques experts use while reading TTEs which could be used to more effectively teach novice readers. METHODS: We performed a prospective qualitative case study to observe how experts and trainees interpret TTEs in an academic institution using a concurrent think aloud (CTA) method. Three TTEs of intermediate complexity were given to 3 advanced imaging fellows, 3 first year fellows and 3 expert TTE readers Participants filled out a report while reading and described aloud their thought processes. Sessions were video and audiotaped for analysis. RESULTS: Experts and advanced fellows used specific techniques that novices did not including: previewing studies, reviewing multiple images simultaneously, having flexibility in image review order and disease coding, and saving hardest elements to code for the end. Direct observation of TTE reading informed trainee inefficiencies and was a well-received educational tool. CONCLUSIONS: In this single centered study we identified several unique approaches experts use to interpret TTEs which may be teachable to novices. Although limited in generalizability the findings of this study suggests that a more systematic approach to TTE interpretation, using techniques found in experts, might be of significant value for trainees. Further study is needed to evaluate teaching practices at other institutions and to assess whether implementation of these techniques by novices improves can improve their diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of reading at an earlier stage in their training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8556165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85561652021-11-04 Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers Anderson, David Roy Blissett, Sarah O’Sullivan, Patricia Qasim, Atif J Echocardiogr Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Trainees learn transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) interpretation through independently completing and reviewing selected portions of the study with experts. The diagnostic accuracy of novice TTE interpretation is known to be low and schema for reading TTEs systematically are lacking. The purpose of our study is to identify techniques experts use while reading TTEs which could be used to more effectively teach novice readers. METHODS: We performed a prospective qualitative case study to observe how experts and trainees interpret TTEs in an academic institution using a concurrent think aloud (CTA) method. Three TTEs of intermediate complexity were given to 3 advanced imaging fellows, 3 first year fellows and 3 expert TTE readers Participants filled out a report while reading and described aloud their thought processes. Sessions were video and audiotaped for analysis. RESULTS: Experts and advanced fellows used specific techniques that novices did not including: previewing studies, reviewing multiple images simultaneously, having flexibility in image review order and disease coding, and saving hardest elements to code for the end. Direct observation of TTE reading informed trainee inefficiencies and was a well-received educational tool. CONCLUSIONS: In this single centered study we identified several unique approaches experts use to interpret TTEs which may be teachable to novices. Although limited in generalizability the findings of this study suggests that a more systematic approach to TTE interpretation, using techniques found in experts, might be of significant value for trainees. Further study is needed to evaluate teaching practices at other institutions and to assess whether implementation of these techniques by novices improves can improve their diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of reading at an earlier stage in their training. Springer Singapore 2021-05-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8556165/ /pubmed/34050902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12574-021-00531-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Anderson, David Roy Blissett, Sarah O’Sullivan, Patricia Qasim, Atif Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers |
title | Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers |
title_full | Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers |
title_fullStr | Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers |
title_short | Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers |
title_sort | differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12574-021-00531-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersondavidroy differencesinechocardiographyinterpretationtechniquesamongtraineesandexpertreaders AT blissettsarah differencesinechocardiographyinterpretationtechniquesamongtraineesandexpertreaders AT osullivanpatricia differencesinechocardiographyinterpretationtechniquesamongtraineesandexpertreaders AT qasimatif differencesinechocardiographyinterpretationtechniquesamongtraineesandexpertreaders |