Cargando…

Temporal stability and detection sensitivity of the dry swab-based diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2

The rapid spread and evolution of various strains of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, continues to challenge the disease controlling measures globally. Alarming concern is, the number of second wave infections surpassed the first wave and the onset of severe symptoms manifesting rapid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gokulan, C G, Kiran, Uday, Kuncha, Santosh Kumar, Mishra, Rakesh K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12038-021-00216-9
_version_ 1784592195019341824
author Gokulan, C G
Kiran, Uday
Kuncha, Santosh Kumar
Mishra, Rakesh K
author_facet Gokulan, C G
Kiran, Uday
Kuncha, Santosh Kumar
Mishra, Rakesh K
author_sort Gokulan, C G
collection PubMed
description The rapid spread and evolution of various strains of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, continues to challenge the disease controlling measures globally. Alarming concern is, the number of second wave infections surpassed the first wave and the onset of severe symptoms manifesting rapidly. In this scenario, testing of maximum population in less time and minimum cost with existing diagnostic amenities is the only possible way to control the spread of the virus. The previously described RNA extraction-free methods using dry swab have been shown to be advantageous in these critical times by different studies. In this work, we show the temporal stability and performance of the dry swab viral detection method at two different temperatures. Contrived dry swabs holding serially diluted SARS-CoV-2 strains A2a and A3i at 25°C (room temperature; RT) and 4°C were subjected to direct RT-PCR and compared with standard VTM-RNA based method. The results clearly indicate that dry swab method of RNA detection is as efficient as VTM-RNA-based method in both strains, when checked for up to 72 h. The lesser C(T) values of dry swab samples in comparison to that of the VTM-RNA samples suggest better sensitivity of the method within 48 h of time. The results collectively suggest that dry swab samples are stable at RT for 24 h and the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR do not show variance from VTM-RNA. This extraction free, direct RT-PCR method holds phenomenal standing in the present life-threatening circumstances due to SARS-CoV-2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12038-021-00216-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8556569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85565692021-11-01 Temporal stability and detection sensitivity of the dry swab-based diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Gokulan, C G Kiran, Uday Kuncha, Santosh Kumar Mishra, Rakesh K J Biosci Article The rapid spread and evolution of various strains of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, continues to challenge the disease controlling measures globally. Alarming concern is, the number of second wave infections surpassed the first wave and the onset of severe symptoms manifesting rapidly. In this scenario, testing of maximum population in less time and minimum cost with existing diagnostic amenities is the only possible way to control the spread of the virus. The previously described RNA extraction-free methods using dry swab have been shown to be advantageous in these critical times by different studies. In this work, we show the temporal stability and performance of the dry swab viral detection method at two different temperatures. Contrived dry swabs holding serially diluted SARS-CoV-2 strains A2a and A3i at 25°C (room temperature; RT) and 4°C were subjected to direct RT-PCR and compared with standard VTM-RNA based method. The results clearly indicate that dry swab method of RNA detection is as efficient as VTM-RNA-based method in both strains, when checked for up to 72 h. The lesser C(T) values of dry swab samples in comparison to that of the VTM-RNA samples suggest better sensitivity of the method within 48 h of time. The results collectively suggest that dry swab samples are stable at RT for 24 h and the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR do not show variance from VTM-RNA. This extraction free, direct RT-PCR method holds phenomenal standing in the present life-threatening circumstances due to SARS-CoV-2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12038-021-00216-9. Springer India 2021-10-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8556569/ /pubmed/34728592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12038-021-00216-9 Text en © Indian Academy of Sciences 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Gokulan, C G
Kiran, Uday
Kuncha, Santosh Kumar
Mishra, Rakesh K
Temporal stability and detection sensitivity of the dry swab-based diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
title Temporal stability and detection sensitivity of the dry swab-based diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
title_full Temporal stability and detection sensitivity of the dry swab-based diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Temporal stability and detection sensitivity of the dry swab-based diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Temporal stability and detection sensitivity of the dry swab-based diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
title_short Temporal stability and detection sensitivity of the dry swab-based diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
title_sort temporal stability and detection sensitivity of the dry swab-based diagnosis of sars-cov-2
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12038-021-00216-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gokulancg temporalstabilityanddetectionsensitivityofthedryswabbaseddiagnosisofsarscov2
AT kiranuday temporalstabilityanddetectionsensitivityofthedryswabbaseddiagnosisofsarscov2
AT kunchasantoshkumar temporalstabilityanddetectionsensitivityofthedryswabbaseddiagnosisofsarscov2
AT mishrarakeshk temporalstabilityanddetectionsensitivityofthedryswabbaseddiagnosisofsarscov2