Cargando…
Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems
Increasingly countries are seeking to reduce emission of greenhouse gases from the agricultural industries, and livestock production in particular, as part of their climate change management. While many reviews update progress in mitigation research, a quantitative assessment of the efficacy and per...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
KeAi Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.09.005 |
_version_ | 1784592203752931328 |
---|---|
author | Almeida, Amelia K. Hegarty, Roger S. Cowie, Annette |
author_facet | Almeida, Amelia K. Hegarty, Roger S. Cowie, Annette |
author_sort | Almeida, Amelia K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasingly countries are seeking to reduce emission of greenhouse gases from the agricultural industries, and livestock production in particular, as part of their climate change management. While many reviews update progress in mitigation research, a quantitative assessment of the efficacy and performance-consequences of nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions from ruminants has been lacking. A meta-analysis was conducted based on 108 refereed papers from recent animal studies (2000–2020) to report effects on CH(4) production, CH(4) yield and CH(4) emission intensity from 8 dietary interventions. The interventions (oils, microalgae, nitrate, ionophores, protozoal control, phytochemicals, essential oils and 3-nitrooxypropanol). Of these, macroalgae and 3-nitrooxypropanol showed greatest efficacy in reducing CH(4) yield (g CH(4)/kg of dry matter intake) at the doses trialled. The confidence intervals derived for the mitigation efficacies could be applied to estimate the potential to reduce national livestock emissions through the implementation of these dietary interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8556609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | KeAi Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85566092021-11-08 Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems Almeida, Amelia K. Hegarty, Roger S. Cowie, Annette Anim Nutr Original Research Article Increasingly countries are seeking to reduce emission of greenhouse gases from the agricultural industries, and livestock production in particular, as part of their climate change management. While many reviews update progress in mitigation research, a quantitative assessment of the efficacy and performance-consequences of nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions from ruminants has been lacking. A meta-analysis was conducted based on 108 refereed papers from recent animal studies (2000–2020) to report effects on CH(4) production, CH(4) yield and CH(4) emission intensity from 8 dietary interventions. The interventions (oils, microalgae, nitrate, ionophores, protozoal control, phytochemicals, essential oils and 3-nitrooxypropanol). Of these, macroalgae and 3-nitrooxypropanol showed greatest efficacy in reducing CH(4) yield (g CH(4)/kg of dry matter intake) at the doses trialled. The confidence intervals derived for the mitigation efficacies could be applied to estimate the potential to reduce national livestock emissions through the implementation of these dietary interventions. KeAi Publishing 2021-12 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8556609/ /pubmed/34754963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.09.005 Text en © 2021 Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Almeida, Amelia K. Hegarty, Roger S. Cowie, Annette Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems |
title | Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems |
title_full | Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems |
title_fullStr | Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems |
title_short | Meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems |
title_sort | meta-analysis quantifying the potential of dietary additives and rumen modifiers for methane mitigation in ruminant production systems |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.09.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almeidaameliak metaanalysisquantifyingthepotentialofdietaryadditivesandrumenmodifiersformethanemitigationinruminantproductionsystems AT hegartyrogers metaanalysisquantifyingthepotentialofdietaryadditivesandrumenmodifiersformethanemitigationinruminantproductionsystems AT cowieannette metaanalysisquantifyingthepotentialofdietaryadditivesandrumenmodifiersformethanemitigationinruminantproductionsystems |