Cargando…

Monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: A randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND: Ventilation has emerged as an important strategy to reduce indoor aerosol transmission of coronavirus disease 2019. Indoor air carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentrations are a surrogate measure of respiratory pathogen transmission risk. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether CO(2) monitors are nece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laurent, Michaël R., Frans, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151349
_version_ 1784592260057268224
author Laurent, Michaël R.
Frans, Johan
author_facet Laurent, Michaël R.
Frans, Johan
author_sort Laurent, Michaël R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ventilation has emerged as an important strategy to reduce indoor aerosol transmission of coronavirus disease 2019. Indoor air carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentrations are a surrogate measure of respiratory pathogen transmission risk. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether CO(2) monitors are necessary and effective to improve ventilation in hospitals. METHODS: A randomized, placebo (sham)-controlled, crossover, open label trial. Between February and May 2021, we placed CO(2) monitors in twelve double-bed patient rooms across two geriatric wards. Staff were instructed to open windows, increase the air exchange rate and reduce room crowding to maintain indoor air CO(2) concentrations ≤800 parts per million (ppm). RESULTS: CO(2) levels increased during morning care and especially in rooms housing couples (rooming-in). The median (interquartile range, IQR) time/day with CO(2) concentration > 800 ppm (primary outcome) was 110 min (IQR 47–207) at baseline, 82 min (IQR 12–226.5) during sham periods, 78 min (IQR 20–154) during intervention periods and 140 min (IQR 19.5–612.5) post-intervention. The intervention period only differed significantly from the post-intervention period (P = 0.02), mainly due to an imbalance in rooming-in. Significant but small differences were observed in secondary outcomes of time/day with CO(2) concentrations > 1000 ppm and daily peak CO(2) concentrations during the intervention vs. baseline and vs. the post-intervention period, but not vs. sham. Staff reported cold discomfort for patients as the main barrier towards increasing ventilation. DISCUSSION: Indoor air CO(2) concentrations in hospital rooms commonly peaked above recommended levels, especially during morning care and rooming-in. There are many possible barriers towards implementing CO(2) monitors to improve ventilation in a real-world hospital setting. A paradigm shift in hospital infection control towards adequate ventilation is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04770597
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8556868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85568682021-11-01 Monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: A randomized crossover trial Laurent, Michaël R. Frans, Johan Sci Total Environ Article BACKGROUND: Ventilation has emerged as an important strategy to reduce indoor aerosol transmission of coronavirus disease 2019. Indoor air carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentrations are a surrogate measure of respiratory pathogen transmission risk. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether CO(2) monitors are necessary and effective to improve ventilation in hospitals. METHODS: A randomized, placebo (sham)-controlled, crossover, open label trial. Between February and May 2021, we placed CO(2) monitors in twelve double-bed patient rooms across two geriatric wards. Staff were instructed to open windows, increase the air exchange rate and reduce room crowding to maintain indoor air CO(2) concentrations ≤800 parts per million (ppm). RESULTS: CO(2) levels increased during morning care and especially in rooms housing couples (rooming-in). The median (interquartile range, IQR) time/day with CO(2) concentration > 800 ppm (primary outcome) was 110 min (IQR 47–207) at baseline, 82 min (IQR 12–226.5) during sham periods, 78 min (IQR 20–154) during intervention periods and 140 min (IQR 19.5–612.5) post-intervention. The intervention period only differed significantly from the post-intervention period (P = 0.02), mainly due to an imbalance in rooming-in. Significant but small differences were observed in secondary outcomes of time/day with CO(2) concentrations > 1000 ppm and daily peak CO(2) concentrations during the intervention vs. baseline and vs. the post-intervention period, but not vs. sham. Staff reported cold discomfort for patients as the main barrier towards increasing ventilation. DISCUSSION: Indoor air CO(2) concentrations in hospital rooms commonly peaked above recommended levels, especially during morning care and rooming-in. There are many possible barriers towards implementing CO(2) monitors to improve ventilation in a real-world hospital setting. A paradigm shift in hospital infection control towards adequate ventilation is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04770597 Elsevier B.V. 2022-02-01 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8556868/ /pubmed/34728206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151349 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Laurent, Michaël R.
Frans, Johan
Monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: A randomized crossover trial
title Monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: A randomized crossover trial
title_full Monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: A randomized crossover trial
title_fullStr Monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: A randomized crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: A randomized crossover trial
title_short Monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: A randomized crossover trial
title_sort monitors to improve indoor air carbon dioxide concentrations in the hospital: a randomized crossover trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151349
work_keys_str_mv AT laurentmichaelr monitorstoimproveindooraircarbondioxideconcentrationsinthehospitalarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT fransjohan monitorstoimproveindooraircarbondioxideconcentrationsinthehospitalarandomizedcrossovertrial